On May 5, 2020 6:39:54 AM GMT+03:00, "Nickle, Richard"
wrote:
I have a two node cluster managing a VIP. The service is an SMTP
service.
This could be active/active, it doesn't matter which node accepts the
SMTP
connection, but I wanted to make sure that a VIP was in place so that
there
was a
So I tried an experiment. I had tried switch over to 'udpu' unicast
transport, but corosync threw an error starting up (which I did not drill
down on yet.)
I went over to my test environment and did the same thing and it worked
fine, the cluster worked and everything.
One thing that is
Yes, I saw that on corosync.conf man page also. I also tried with and
without the bindnetaddr in my totem configuration (I dropped the whole
interface {} section as in the example at the Ubuntu quickstart:
https://clusterlabs.org/quickstart-ubuntu.html)
Thanks!
*RICHARD E. NICKLE*
*Sr.
05.05.2020 19:30, Nickle, Richard пишет:
> So I tried an experiment. I had tried switch over to 'udpu' unicast
> transport, but corosync threw an error starting up (which I did not drill
> down on yet.)
>
> I went over to my test environment and did the same thing and it worked
> fine, the
Thanks Honza and Andrei (and Strahil? I might have missed a message in the
thread...)
I'm running this in a VM cluster, so they are on a VLAN and there is
switched routing.
I tried enabling the 'transport: udpu' unicast option, but I have mixed
results: corosync seems to fault and not come up,
05.05.2020 16:44, Nickle, Richard пишет:
> Thanks Honza and Andrei (and Strahil? I might have missed a message in the
> thread...)
>
Yep, all messages from Strahil end up in spam folder.
___
Manage your subscription:
>>> "Nickle, Richard" schrieb am 05.05.2020 um 18:30
in
Nachricht
<19182_1588696251_5EB194BA_19182_3_1_CAD6eeWcH=QWPsnoOChEbgrrt_m-8W+Je9yLvE=mDmG
_vjc...@mail.gmail.com>:
> So I tried an experiment. I had tried switch over to 'udpu' unicast
> transport, but corosync threw an error starting up
