t;> Hi Steffen,
>>>>>> I've been experimenting with it since last weekend,
> but I haven't been able to reproduce the same
> situation.
>>>>>> It seems that the cause is that the reproduction
>
; >> 172.31.0.32 kvm03-node02 kvm03-node02.avigol-gcs.dk
>> >> 172.31.0.33kvm03-node03 kvm03-node03.avigol-gcs.dk
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 11:15 AM Klaus Wenninger
>>
>> > wrote:
>> >>> Hi Steffen,
>> >
ed to
> open-source clustering welcomed <mailto:users@clusterlabs.org>>
> > Cc:
> > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 21:42
> > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs
> status
> >
> > On 1/7/21 1:13 PM, Steffen
tering welcomed
> > Cc:
> > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 21:42
> > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status
> >
> > On 1/7/21 1:13 PM, Steffen Vinther Sørensen wrote:
> >> Hi Klaus,
> >>
> >> Yes then the status does s
rom: Klaus Wenninger
> To: Steffen Vinther Sørensen ; Cluster Labs - All topics
> related to open-source clustering welcomed
> Cc:
> Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 21:42
> Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status
>
> On 1/7/21 1:13 PM, Steffen Vinther Søre
mforting "pending fencing actions" status msg.
>>> Okay!
>>>
>>> Repeat the standby and unstandby steps in the same way to check.
>>> We will start checking after tomorrow, so I think it will take some time
>>> until next week.
>>>
&g
gt;
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp"
> >> To: Reid Wahl ; Cluster Labs - All topics related to
> >> open-source clustering welcomed
> >> Cc:
> >> Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 17:5
ot;renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp"
>> To: Reid Wahl ; Cluster Labs - All topics related to
>> open-source clustering welcomed
>> Cc:
>> Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 17:51
>> Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status
>>
>> Hi Steffen,
&g
To: Reid Wahl ; Cluster Labs - All topics related to
> open-source clustering welcomed
> Cc:
> Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 17:51
> Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status
>
> Hi Steffen,
> Hi Reid,
>
> The fencing history is kept inside sto
a19661...@ybb.ne.jp; Cluster Labs - All topics related to
>open-source clustering welcomed
>Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 17:39
>Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status
>
>
>Hi, Steffen. Those attachments don't contain the CIB. They contain the `pcs
>config`
to
> open-source clustering welcomed
> > Cc:
> > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 17:05
> > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status
> >
> > Hi Hideo,
> >
> > Here CIB settings attached (pcs config show) for all 3 of my nodes
>
iginal Message -
>> > From: Reid Wahl
>> > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering
> welcomed
>> > Cc:
>> > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:58
>> > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status
>
; >> > You will need to take advantage of the modified pacemaker to resolve
> > the issue.
> >> >
> >> > Best Regards,
> >> > Hideo Yamauchi.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > - Original Mes
gt;> Best Regards,
>> Hideo Yamauchi.
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -----
>> > From: Reid Wahl
>> > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering
> welcomed
>> > Cc:
>> > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:58
>&
clustering welcomed
> >
> > Cc:
> > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:58
> > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status
> >
> > It's supposedly fixed in that version.
> > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787749
> > - https:
> Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:58
> Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status
>
> It's supposedly fixed in that version.
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787749
> - https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4713471
>
> So you may
deo Yamauchi.
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: Reid Wahl
> > > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
> > >
> > > Cc:
> > > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:07
> > > Subje
t; Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamauchi.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: Reid Wahl
> > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
> >
> > Cc:
> > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:07
> > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing
Hi Reid,
Pacemaker version is the same on all 3 nodes, CentOS7 most recent update :
# pacemakerd --version
Pacemaker 1.1.23-1.el7_9.1
Written by Andrew Beekhof
# rpm -qa | grep pacemaker
pacemaker-cluster-libs-1.1.23-1.el7_9.1.x86_64
pacemaker-cli-1.1.23-1.el7_9.1.x86_64
-
> From: Reid Wahl
> To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
>
> Cc:
> Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:07
> Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status
>
> Hi, Steffen. Are your cluster nodes all running the s
Hi, Steffen. Are your cluster nodes all running the same Pacemaker
versions? This looks like Bug 5401[1], which is fixed by upstream
commit df71a07[2]. I'm a little bit confused about why it only shows
up on one out of three nodes though.
[1] https://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5401
[2]
Hello
node 1 is showing this in 'pcs status'
Pending Fencing Actions:
* reboot of kvm03-node02.avigol-gcs.dk pending: client=crmd.37819,
origin=kvm03-node03.avigol-gcs.dk
node 2 and node 3 outputs no such thing (node 3 is DC)
Google is not much help, how to investigate this further and get rid
22 matches
Mail list logo
