On 2005-08-18, Joerg Sonnenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:33:11AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I can control all options from /etc/mk.conf, not the separation used in
FreeBSD by default.
What's wrong with /etc/make.conf for the system wide default setting?
I
Hi!
I want cvsup a Dragonfly's CVS-repository, what its size now?
Please CC me as I'm not subscribed.
Thank!
--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Gabriel Ambuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johannes Hofmann wrote:
I don't understand what this has to do with Xen or similar approaches.
Every process has it's own address space anyway. And if there
are local root exploits, they need to be fixed, just as security flaws
that might exist in Xen
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:18:06PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Hi!
I want cvsup a Dragonfly's CVS-repository, what its size now?
Please CC me as I'm not subscribed.
Thank!
Right now the entire repo is 682M.
pgpT5EcjvG7YR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 2005-08-19 15:54, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
On Fri, August 19, 2005 8:28 am, Richard Nyberg said:
o What does 2CSNAP mean?
I think that's short for Corecode snapshot?
o Is Release-1.2 release 1.2.0 or the latest release 1.2.x?
It's the latest, as far as I know.
o Which compiler
On Fri, August 19, 2005 10:04 am, Erik Wikström said:
On 2005-08-19 15:54, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
o Which compiler version is used for building Release-1.2?
2.95.
Wouldn't it be 3.4 by now? I thought that 2.95 didn't support TLS
and had been removed from alltogether.
Good point. 2.95
:Don't know whether I should report this here, or in Bugs, but here it goes.
:
:I installed the latest ISO a few days ago. Because I wanted to help
:testing pkgsrc, I cvs-upped the pkg-src tree. I think after about 90%, the
:filesystem ran out of inodes.
:I know there is no 'non destructive'
On 8/19/05, Jeremy C. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Raphael Marmier wrote:
Could you give me an url where you put these exemples and scripts?
I have not had time for a while. But here are some links:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2002/09/20/0013.html
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
o Which compiler version is used for building Release-1.2?
2.95.
Wouldn't it be 3.4 by now? I thought that 2.95 didn't support TLS
and had been removed from alltogether.
Good point. 2.95 is what 1.2 used by default, but I don't know what the
actual releases are
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Eduardo Tongson wrote:
Neat stuff there.
Instead of those .spec files or XML I think using a light database like
sqlite to store metadata is worth it. What do you think?
I'd prefer not to depend on more tools or libraries not provided by
default.
I see yum also uses
On 8/19/05, Jeremy C. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Eduardo Tongson wrote:
Neat stuff there.
Instead of those .spec files or XML I think using a light database like
sqlite to store metadata is worth it. What do you think?
I'd prefer not to depend on more tools or
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:15:30 +0200, Matthew Dillon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Don't know whether I should report this here, or in Bugs, but here it
goes.
:
:I installed the latest ISO a few days ago. Because I wanted to help
:testing pkgsrc, I cvs-upped the pkg-src tree. I think after
Matthew Dillon wrote:
[inode shortage snip]
Well, the defaults are pretty good as they stand but they are not
designed for squeezing large numbers of files onto fairly small
partitions. If you wanted to make newfs smarter you could have it
drop back to 1K/8K for filesystems less
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emiel Kollof wrote:
| Hiten?
| Are you still planning on porting JFS someday? (not that I'm asking you
| to drop anything, but a timeframe like Yeah, somewhere in the somewhat
| near future would be good enough for me :)
He is working on it, and is
14 matches
Mail list logo
