Rahul Siddharthan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm still keeping an eye on DragonFly, and hope to run it again one of
these days. I think the biggest problem in FreeBSD that DragonFly
fixes is attitude.
It's not a completely accurate answer, but attitude is certainly
sufficient in my book. I
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Justin C. Sherrill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, February 27, 2008 11:29 pm, Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
The benchmark at http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/os-mysql.png
(for the full presentation, see
http://www.freedomtc.com/pdf/7.0_Preview.pdf, that
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:53:36 +1100
Dmitri Nikulin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Justin C. Sherrill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, February 27, 2008 11:29 pm, Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
The benchmark at http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/os-mysql.png
Petr Janda wrote:
The DragonFly live cd doesn't have a GUI. If you want to test DragonFly you
should install it and then use pkgsrc to install GUI.
Petr
OK. Thanks!
Best regards
Sten Solberg
On Thu, February 28, 2008 5:53 am, Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
before internet clustering becomes useful at all. That's my biggest
fear regarding this project - that by the time its highest goals are
achievable, the full potential of those goals will still be out of
reach, perhaps forever.
Only if
Sure, but SMP scalability is one of the key goals of DragonFly, and
for it to be beaten by NetBSD (for which this is not a major goal, and
for which SMP scalability only started being worked on a year ago) is
very confusing. I haven't seen it compared with 1.12, but since no
huge scalability
Hi,
I installed 1.12.0 on my laptop along with 1.10.1 packages (should the
packages really be recompiled or can I use 1.10.1 binary packages?). I
use an external lcd panel since laptop screen is too small. Now when
booting, I switch the screen output to go to the external lcd panel
only (ie
Well, I'll give you my 5-second opinion.
What I am not worried about:
* Developer interest has always increased slowly and continues to
do so. I'd be interested in commit statistics but my gut feeling,
from NOT having to push into subsystems that I used to
On Thu, February 28, 2008 12:23 pm, mustkaru wrote:
Hi,
I installed 1.12.0 on my laptop along with 1.10.1 packages (should the
packages really be recompiled or can I use 1.10.1 binary packages?). I
I don't have a good answer on the xorg difference between releases, but:
most/all of the
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Justin C. Sherrill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, February 28, 2008 12:23 pm, mustkaru wrote:
Hi,
I installed 1.12.0 on my laptop along with 1.10.1 packages (should the
packages really be recompiled or can I use 1.10.1 binary packages?). I
I don't
On Thu, February 28, 2008 1:50 pm, mustkaru wrote:
Thanks, am looking forward to 1.12 bin packages! Could you possibly
send an announcement to the list too?
I will - it took I think 8 days to get through the first build for 1.10,
so it'll be a little while.
Matthew Dillon wrote:
* Similarly with AMD64. We need it. I've developed the
infrastructure separation required and we even have a fully
virtualized kernel (vkernel) which demonstratres the infrastructure
separation. Most of the generic kernel code can
I don't have a good answer on the xorg difference between releases, but:
most/all of the 1.10.1 packages should work, as I understand it. We'll
have 1.12 binary packages soon; I have to get through a build on pkgbox.
That reminds me.
Maybe the pbulk or whatever you are using allows you to
Matthew Dillon wrote:
Well, I'll give you my 5-second opinion.
*snip*
* Our interrupt routing subsystem really needs a major upgrade.
(i.e. a major port from FreeBSD).
Given that theirs has choked several times on some fairly common
hardware that DID work thru 6.2
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:13:25PM +, Bill Hacker wrote:
Matthew Dillon wrote:
I spent more time then I should have perfecting the low level
infrastructure, trying to build a base upon which all the other
work could occur.
: I installed 1.12.0 on my laptop along with 1.10.1 packages (should the
: packages really be recompiled or can I use 1.10.1 binary packages?). I
:
:I don't have a good answer on the xorg difference between releases, but:
:most/all of the 1.10.1 packages should work, as I understand it. We'll
Stability is important to me but I also recognize that even the best
project can become stale if one does not choose to develop the right
aspects of it. A weakness in DragonFly is that it took a while to get
to the more interesting things, like HAMMER, and will take yet longer
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:05 AM, Matthew Dillon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'll give you my 5-second opinion.
What I am not worried about:
...
* Ports and packages. This was a huge worry of mine at the beginning
of the project. I no longer worry about it.
18 matches
Mail list logo
