Jost Tobias Springenberg wrote:
I do not want to sound offensive here but I don't get the point of this
discussion at all.
What exactly is wrong with null mounts and / or the way PFS work ?
If you want to have seperate partitions instead of PFS, thats perfectly fine, nobody
forces you to use
Hi all,
I've been using tree.h (
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/cvsweb/src/sys/sys/tree.h ) in C projects
for a long time, and it has bothered me to have suggest braces around
empty body in if-statement warnings from GCC. Old GCCs didn't even
have a -Wno-empty-body flag, and I think the GCC in
Matthew Dillon wrote:
There are several reasons for using PFSs.
EUREKA!
Matt - you've re-invented Ramphotyphlops braminus:
Weigh this:
PFS = Parthenogenetic File System
hammer pfs-master = select a host.
hammer pfs-slave = induce ovulation.
hammer mirror-copy = self-inseminate
-- Forwarded message --
From: Colin Adams colinpaulad...@googlemail.com
Date: 2009/2/18
Subject: Re: EUREKA - was the 'why' of pseudofs
To: Bill Hacker w...@conducive.org
2009/2/18 Bill Hacker w...@conducive.org:
Proven pattern among Odontata, too:
Colin Adams wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Colin Adams colinpaulad...@googlemail.com
Date: 2009/2/18
Subject: Re: EUREKA - was the 'why' of pseudofs
2009/2/18 Bill Hacker w...@conducive.org:
Proven pattern among Odontata, too:
http://ecoevo.uvigo.es/Olalla/index_en.htm
: I really don't like this idea. Adding braces and dummy do/while,
: but I don't like casting the passed expression to void simply as
: a means of avoiding a compiler warning.
:
:The cast is needed as the value of the element should explicitly be
:ignored for the default macro.
:
:
