CRC error prevents hammer reblock. What to do?

2010-04-15 Thread Jan Lentfer
I am experiencing problems when running hammer reblock on /var. I get: # hammer reblock /var reblock start 8000: free level 0 Reblock /var failed: Input/output error Reblocked: 0/0 btree nodes 0/0 data elements 0/0 data bytes I tried all the reblock- typed like inodes

Re: CRC error prevents hammer reblock. What to do?

2010-04-15 Thread Jan Lentfer
Antonio made the proposal on irc to hammer mirror-copy the /var PFS. This worked without any error. Jan -- professional: http://www.oscar-consult.de private: http://neslonek.homeunix.org/drupal/

Re: CRC error prevents hammer reblock. What to do?

2010-04-15 Thread Jan Lentfer
I also got a kernel dump this night. I couldn't restore the dump until now because of some issues with dumpdev not being swap. But this might be related Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: panic: assertion: bcmp(elm-leaf, leaf, sizeof(leaf)) == 0 in hammer_reblock_helper Trace beginning

Re: CRC error prevents hammer reblock. What to do?

2010-04-15 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Antonio made the proposal on irc to hammer mirror-copy the /var PFS. This :worked without any error. : :Jan :-- :professional: http://www.oscar-consult.de :private: http://neslonek.homeunix.org/drupal/ That's an excellent solution. The mirroring code will ignore CRC errors (not copy

Re: CRC error prevents hammer reblock. What to do?

2010-04-15 Thread Matthew Dillon
:I also got a kernel dump this night. I couldn't restore the dump until now :because of some issues with dumpdev not being swap. But this might be :related : :Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: :panic: assertion: bcmp(elm-leaf, leaf, sizeof(leaf)) == 0 in :hammer_reblock_helper :Trace

Re: CRC error prevents hammer reblock. What to do?

2010-04-15 Thread Jan Lentfer
Matthew Dillon schrieb: I'm trying to find a common thread between your reported issue and Francois's reported issue. Were you switching between 32 bit and 64 bit kernels with this HAMMER filesystem too? No. Pure 32bit. Jan

Re: Does the Slave pfs take up more space that the Master?

2010-04-15 Thread Sdävtaker
What i remember happened to me was that master pfs are pruned/reblocked by the periodic but the slave pfs are not, so time to time i used to get a lot of used space in my backups, just go and prune/reblock by hand and check if thats what happening to you, check the config before, so you sure not