do it in
three days.
Wow! you are faster than God himself! I have the idea that some people whom
i will not mention will turn green reading that ...
--
Michel Talon
, no
bsd partitions. In other words, it is of very limited utility, in my
opinion. A good partitioning tool is still lacking for FreeBSD,
able to do at least what Linux cfdisk does so simply. I suppose the geometry
problems which plague FreeBSD sysinstall are also present on sfdisk.
--
Michel Talon
circumventing the patents. To take another exemple it took many years
Solaris to be considered better than the good old slowlaris system.
--
Michel Talon
I think it is not irrelevant to mention here the announcement:
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=715406
Moshe Bar, openMosix founder and project leader, has announced plans to end
the openMosix Project effective March 1, 2008.
The increasing power and availability of low cost
Matthew Dillon wrote:
I personally believe that postfix is superior. I personally do not
mind running GPL'd code. But I also would prefer to have as little
GPL'd code in our managed code base as possible.
What does this mean? I would dearly like to integrate portions
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
One has to be totally unaware of realities to suggest tools from
obscure Linux distributions, wether they are good or bad, when such
distribution may collapse at any moment. Already the move to NetBSD
pkgsrc has cost DFLY division by 3 of the number of available
Rupert Pigott wrote:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:39:30 -0500, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
True, but Matt has explained that ZFS doesn't provide the functionality
that DragonFlyBSD needs for cluster computing.
ZFS solves the problem of building a bigger fileserver, but it
doesn't help you
have the bikeshed in sky blue pink with yellow dots.
--
Michel Talon
to multiuser will work and allow to do it a second time.
--
Michel Talon
Kris Kennaway wrote:
When using the same binary, the CPU scores are statistically
indistinguishable between the different FreeBSD versions. This makes
sense since there's little kernel involvment in running userland
integer/FP computations. When running the gcc 2.95 binary all
versions of
Raphaël Marmier wrote:
This would answer the needs expressed many time in an acceptable
compromise:
- upgrading an app without breaking another in the process
- able to install multiple versions of a package
- allow piecemeal upgrades
- allow updating a single package
- you can have several
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
I have had very good luck with portupgrade, on multiple freebsd
systems on multiple platforms. I do avoid the biggies like KDE
or Gnome, which obviously helps.
Since half the ports i have on my machine, if not 3/4 require one or the
other of Gnome libraries,
12 matches
Mail list logo
