do it in
three days.
Wow! you are faster than God himself! I have the idea that some people whom
i will not mention will turn green reading that ...
--
Michel Talon
, no
bsd partitions. In other words, it is of very limited utility, in my
opinion. A good partitioning tool is still lacking for FreeBSD,
able to do at least what Linux cfdisk does so simply. I suppose the geometry
problems which plague FreeBSD sysinstall are also present on sfdisk.
--
Michel Talon
circumventing the patents. To take another exemple it took many years
Solaris to be considered better than the good old slowlaris system.
--
Michel Talon
I think it is not irrelevant to mention here the announcement:
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=715406
Moshe Bar, openMosix founder and project leader, has announced plans to end
the openMosix Project effective March 1, 2008.
The increasing power and availability of low cost
Matthew Dillon wrote:
I personally believe that postfix is superior. I personally do not
mind running GPL'd code. But I also would prefer to have as little
GPL'd code in our managed code base as possible.
What does this mean? I would dearly like to integrate portions
smoothly. To my knowledge OpenBSD is the only
BSD which has a working update mechanism, fully integrated. I have written
something experimental for FreeBSD:
http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/pkgupgrade
because i think there is no future for an OS without a binary packages
management system
Rupert Pigott wrote:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:39:30 -0500, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
True, but Matt has explained that ZFS doesn't provide the functionality
that DragonFlyBSD needs for cluster computing.
ZFS solves the problem of building a bigger fileserver, but it
doesn't help you
a lot about the
usefulness or the necessity of these concepts.
--
Michel Talon
concrete reports that one can install FreeBSD
completely on logical partitions (that is even /boot/loader supports that),
and i am quite sure that DragonFly supports it as well. So there is no
problem with lack of free primary partitions to install these systems.
--
Michel Talon
the
cursor becomes very jerky)
There's nothing very complex happening here; I suspect there's something
odd with your video, perhaps? Can someone else with KDE installed confirm
this?
I have KDE installed here, i see nothing particular with Konqueror.
--
Michel Talon
for me this was the cause for
SSL not working in KDE under FreeBSD. Remove this ssl-devel, this makes no
difference for OpenOffice, and KDE suddenly works OK.
--
Michel Talon
(required by OpenOffice) the ssl support in KDE breaks
applications coredump, etc. Remove ssl-beta and everything works well again.
--
Michel Talon
the same time as FreeBSD to boot, faster than the Linux distro i had
previously (Debian Sarge).
Rahul
--
Michel Talon
have the bikeshed in sky blue pink with yellow dots.
--
Michel Talon
of security flaws. As you sure know, NetBSD
has decided to remove sendmail from the base system and replace it by
postfix.
--
Michel Talon
hub
and went into our sysadm mail box. The solution is here in the postfix faq
http://www.postfix.org/faq.html#some_local
I am sure there are a number of similar small differences which preclude
simply turning a knob in rc.conf.
--
Michel Talon
Talon
the Ubuntu installer and the BSDinstaller, and come back after. From
my own judgement it is slightly better than freebsd sysinstall on some
points and worse on others, and light years behind most decent
Linux installers (Mandrake, Fedora, etc.).
--
Michel Talon
cores or more, than commodity machines used to do the job of
dedicated hardware.
And yes, as Kris said, jemalloc works well at present on FreeBSD.
--
Michel Talon
. Schilling!
Not to comment about the capacities of FreeBSD developers as seen from
his majesty perspective.
--
Michel Talon
, and then KDE, Gnome etc. Presumably the developers are
busy solving important and hard problems at the moment, so being user
friendly is not a big priority.
--
Michel Talon
.
Finally let me congratulate Matt for his work and hope best
chance of success.
--
Michel Talon
to multiuser will work and allow to do it a second time.
--
Michel Talon
Kris Kennaway wrote:
When using the same binary, the CPU scores are statistically
indistinguishable between the different FreeBSD versions. This makes
sense since there's little kernel involvment in running userland
integer/FP computations. When running the gcc 2.95 binary all
versions of
Raphaël Marmier wrote:
This would answer the needs expressed many time in an acceptable
compromise:
- upgrading an app without breaking another in the process
- able to install multiple versions of a package
- allow piecemeal upgrades
- allow updating a single package
- you can have several
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
I have had very good luck with portupgrade, on multiple freebsd
systems on multiple platforms. I do avoid the biggies like KDE
or Gnome, which obviously helps.
Since half the ports i have on my machine, if not 3/4 require one or the
other of Gnome libraries,
26 matches
Mail list logo
