:It does boot with DMA turned on, unless I am missing something? The
:WDMA2 drive is the old CD drive, the UDMA33 drive is the hard disk. :-)
Yes, that is so... but I'm not entirely sure that it actually uses
those settings when you have a configured slave without a master.
The dd c
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:As for disk, a very simple `dd if=/dev/ of=/dev/null` gets me ~25%,
:and as far as I can see DMA is enabled.
:
:---
:([EMAIL PROTECTED])/usr/pkg/etc atacontrol mode 0
:Master = ???
:Slave = WDMA2
:([EMAIL PROTECTED])/usr/pkg/etc atacontrol mode 1
:Master = ???
:Slave = U
:As for disk, a very simple `dd if=/dev/ of=/dev/null` gets me ~25%,
:and as far as I can see DMA is enabled.
:
:---
:([EMAIL PROTECTED])/usr/pkg/etc atacontrol mode 0
:Master = ???
:Slave = WDMA2
:([EMAIL PROTECTED])/usr/pkg/etc atacontrol mode 1
:Master = ???
:Slave = UDMA33
:---
:
:As you ca
Mark Cullen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:18:33PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
(cmd-sink) pop: conftest.c
(cmd-sink) pop: -lmysqlclient
(cmd-sink) pop: -lz
(cmd-sink) pop: -lm
(cmd-sink) pop: -lcrypt
(cmd-sink) pop:
-I/usr/obj/pkgsrc/net/pure-ftpd/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:18:33PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
(cmd-sink) pop: conftest.c
(cmd-sink) pop: -lmysqlclient
(cmd-sink) pop: -lz
(cmd-sink) pop: -lm
(cmd-sink) pop: -lcrypt
(cmd-sink) pop: -I/usr/obj/pkgsrc/net/pure-ftpd/work/.buildlink/includ
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])/usr/pkgsrc/net/pure-ftpd/work ls
> .buildlink .patch_done .work.log
> .compiler .patch_makevars.mk .wrapper
> .configure_makevars.mk .pkgdb .wrapper_done
> .extract_done .tools .wrapper_ma
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:18:33PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
> (cmd-sink) pop: conftest.c
> (cmd-sink) pop: -lmysqlclient
> (cmd-sink) pop: -lz
> (cmd-sink) pop: -lm
> (cmd-sink) pop: -lcrypt
> (cmd-sink) pop: -I/usr/obj/pkgsrc/net/pure-ftpd/work/.buildlink/include
> (cm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:53:57PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:41:28PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
I don't know if it is anything to be concerned about, but I seem to be
seeing high interrupt CPU usage in top (at leas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:59:32PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:08:01PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
Compiling pure-ftpd, from pkgsrc as of earlier today, with the mysql
option doesn't appear to work.
Seems to work f
Mark Cullen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:59:32PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:08:01PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
Compiling pure-ftpd, from pkgsrc as of earlier today, with the
mysql option doesn't appear to wor
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:53:57PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:41:28PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
> >
> >>I don't know if it is anything to be concerned about, but I seem to be
> >>seeing high interrupt CPU usage in top (at least) when compilin
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:59:32PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:08:01PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
> >
> >>Compiling pure-ftpd, from pkgsrc as of earlier today, with the mysql
> >>option doesn't appear to work.
> >
> >
> >Seems to work fine here
I remember some chatter about cpustat but i don't
see it in 1.5.3-PREVIEW, and I don't see that top
shows the cpu breakdown. What's the status of
this, or what's the utility of choice for
monitoring the allocation of cpu resources?
DT
__
Do You Yaho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:08:01PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
Compiling pure-ftpd, from pkgsrc as of earlier today, with the mysql
option doesn't appear to work.
Seems to work fine here with MySQL 5. Can I have the config.log?
Joerg
I should probably mention I am u
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:41:28PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
I don't know if it is anything to be concerned about, but I seem to be
seeing high interrupt CPU usage in top (at least) when compiling things...
This is a problem of system accounting. The pkgsrc build is
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:08:01PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
> Compiling pure-ftpd, from pkgsrc as of earlier today, with the mysql
> option doesn't appear to work.
Seems to work fine here with MySQL 5. Can I have the config.log?
Joerg
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Well, world and kernel just finished compiling, without INVARIANTS, and
:there's no difference. Infact, it seems worse... but it's probably the
:same. I guess I should keep INVARIANTS in for debugging in case of panics?
:
:http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/1571/interrupt
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:41:28PM +0100, Mark Cullen wrote:
> I don't know if it is anything to be concerned about, but I seem to be
> seeing high interrupt CPU usage in top (at least) when compiling things...
This is a problem of system accounting. The pkgsrc build is heavy on
fork and exec, wh
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Folks,
:
:Perhaps it is just my client (Mozilla on OS X), but on most postings
:over a day or two old, I am seeing the header only, and the below
:message (originally in html) as body:
:
:==
:
:Error!
:newsgroup
ME again!
Compiling pure-ftpd, from pkgsrc as of earlier today, with the mysql
option doesn't appear to work.
---
[..snip..]
checking default TCP send buffer size... 32768
checking default TCP receive buffer size... 57344
checking for floor in -lm... yes
checking for gzclose in -lz... yes
chec
Gergo Szakal wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 22:54:32 +0100
Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Recently installed MySQL from pkgsrc (same way as you described) and cannot
confirm, works flawlessly.
Hi there,
I just now installed MySQL 4.1.19 from pkgsrc, trying to set up a DF box
and see if
:Well, world and kernel just finished compiling, without INVARIANTS, and
:there's no difference. Infact, it seems worse... but it's probably the
:same. I guess I should keep INVARIANTS in for debugging in case of panics?
:
:http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/1571/interrupt3eg.jpg
:
:40% and very
Mark Cullen wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taken when the interrupt in top was at 22%, building world:
> > 320 total
> 279 clk
> 37 fxp0
> 4 ata1
> > Taken when the interrupt in top was at 5%, still building world:
> > 288 total
> 281 clk
> 7
--- Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Taken when the interrupt in top was at
> 22%, building world:
> > >
> > > 320 total
> > > 279 clk
> > > 37 fxp0
> > > 4 ata1
> > >
> > > Taken when the interrupt in top
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taken when the interrupt in top was at 22%, building world:
>
> 320 total
> 279 clk
> 37 fxp0
> 4 ata1
>
> Taken when the interrupt in top was at 5%, still building world:
>
> 288 total
> 281 clk
> 7 fxp0
> a
Danial Thom wrote:
--- Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if it is anything to be
concerned about, but I seem to be
> seeing high interrupt CPU usage in top (at
least) when compiling things...
>
> ---
>
Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taken when the interrupt in top was at 22%, building world:
>
> 320 total
> 279 clk
> 37 fxp0
> 4 ata1
>
> Taken when the interrupt in top was at 5%, still building world:
>
> 288 total
> 281 clk
> 7 fxp0
> ata1
>
> Watching it in
Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Have you tried "vmstat -i"? It might give an indication
> > if any of the device interrupts is causing the problem.
>
> Yep, doesn't look particularly unusual to me (taken while compiling
> multiple things)?
>
[omitted som
--- Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't know if it is anything to be
> concerned about, but I seem to be
> > > seeing high interrupt CPU usage in top (at
> least) when compiling things...
> > >
> > > ---
> >
:Folks,
:
:Perhaps it is just my client (Mozilla on OS X), but on most postings
:over a day or two old, I am seeing the header only, and the below
:message (originally in html) as body:
:
:==
:
:Error!
:newsgroup server responded:No suc
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:15:42AM -0700, walt wrote:
> No, Johnny made a typo in pkgsrc/mk/flavor/pkg/install.mk:
>
> --- install.mk.bad 2006-06-07 08:21:45.0 -0700
> +++ install.mk 2006-06-07 09:10:05.0 -0700
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
> ${_PKG_SILENT}${_PKG_DEBUG}
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if it is anything to be concerned about, but I seem to be
> seeing high interrupt CPU usage in top (at least) when compiling things...
>
> ---
> load averages: 0.81, 0.57, 0.36 up 0+00:37:49
Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if it is anything to be concerned about, but I seem to be
> seeing high interrupt CPU usage in top (at least) when compiling things...
>
> ---
> load averages: 0.81, 0.57, 0.36 up 0+00:37:49
> 15:41:44
> 43 proc
Bill Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps it is just my client (Mozilla on OS X), but on most postings
> over a day or two old, I am seeing the header only, and the below
> message (originally in html) as body:
Same here. I get "article unavailable" when trying to read
a bunch of post
--- Simon 'corecode' Schubert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07.06.2006, at 16:41, Mark Cullen wrote:
> > I don't know if it is anything to be
> concerned about, but I seem to be
> > seeing high interrupt CPU usage in top (at
> least) when compiling
> > things...
>
> ha! i reported the same
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:24 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 07:45:45AM -0700, walt wrote:
> > Petr Janda wrote:
> > > elevator# bmake install
> > > ===> Installing for fixesproto-3.0.2
> > > ERROR: fixesproto-3.0.2 conflicts with installed package(s):
> > > ERROR: ine
> >
Folks,
Perhaps it is just my client (Mozilla on OS X), but on most postings
over a day or two old, I am seeing the header only, and the below
message (originally in html) as body:
==
Error!
newsgroup server responded:No such article
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
On 07.06.2006, at 16:41, Mark Cullen wrote:
I don't know if it is anything to be concerned about, but I seem to be
seeing high interrupt CPU usage in top (at least) when compiling
things...
ha! i reported the same, but never found out the reason. which
ha
On 07.06.2006, at 16:41, Mark Cullen wrote:
I don't know if it is anything to be concerned about, but I seem to be
seeing high interrupt CPU usage in top (at least) when compiling
things...
ha! i reported the same, but never found out the reason. which
hardware (exactly) do you use?
cheer
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 07:45:45AM -0700, walt wrote:
> Petr Janda wrote:
> > elevator# bmake install
> > ===> Installing for fixesproto-3.0.2
> > ERROR: fixesproto-3.0.2 conflicts with installed package(s):
> > ERROR: ine
>
> I'm seeing the same error for openldap, so there seems
> to be some br
Petr Janda wrote:
> elevator# bmake install
> ===> Installing for fixesproto-3.0.2
> ERROR: fixesproto-3.0.2 conflicts with installed package(s):
> ERROR: ine
I'm seeing the same error for openldap, so there seems
to be some breakage in the pkgsrc infrastructure on DF.
Dunno how to fix it, but y
I don't know if it is anything to be concerned about, but I seem to be
seeing high interrupt CPU usage in top (at least) when compiling things...
---
load averages: 0.81, 0.57, 0.36 up 0+00:37:49
15:41:44
43 processes: 2 running, 41 sleeping
CPU states: 37.1% user, 0.
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 15:18:52 +0200
Gergo Szakal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 22:08:07 +1000
> "Dmitri Nikulin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Linux will work okay, and so will
> >FreeBSD. I don't know which is more stable right now, or more
> >performant for whatever work load.
Gergo Szakal wrote:
In /boot/loader.conf:
I have no such file. May I create one or is there smth wrong? (I am running
1.5.3_DEVELOPMENT, maybe I ought to go back to some sort of stable branch?)
Yea, just create it.
Sascha
--
http://yoyodyne.ath.cx
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:26:05 -0400 (EDT)
"Justin C. Sherrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, June 7, 2006 3:36 am, Gergo Szakal wrote:
>> Hey, I am here again, with my n00b questions. :-)
>> I would like to load smbfs support at boot time. How do I achieve it? i
>> cannot even load it after bo
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 22:08:07 +1000
"Dmitri Nikulin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Linux will work okay, and so will
>FreeBSD. I don't know which is more stable right now, or more
>performant for whatever work load... and your Linux experience will
>depend highly on your distribution. And let me tell
On 6/7/06, Simon 'corecode' Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 07.06.2006, at 14:05, Gergo Szakal wrote:
>> If you add them to your kernel config (or to GENERIC, for that
>> reason),
>> they will get compiled in. So the exact point is *not* to have it in
>> the kernel config, but instead to
On Wed, June 7, 2006 3:36 am, Gergo Szakal wrote:
> Hey, I am here again, with my n00b questions. :-)
> I would like to load smbfs support at boot time. How do I achieve it? i
> cannot even load it after boot, I get this:
In /boot/loader.conf:
libiconv_load="YES"
libmchain_load="YES"
smbfs_load="
On Wed, June 7, 2006 8:08 am, Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
> Difficult question. DragonFly's kernel has direct rendering for a few
> cards (including some of the older Radeon chips which are still good
> for many things). However, if you want "good" 3D acceleration, you
The older chips in question is an
On 07.06.2006, at 14:05, Gergo Szakal wrote:
If you add them to your kernel config (or to GENERIC, for that
reason),
they will get compiled in. So the exact point is *not* to have it in
the kernel config, but instead to load it via kldload.
I am afraid we are talking about the same thing withou
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:15:45 +0200
"Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 07.06.2006, at 12:37, Gergo Szakal wrote:
>> Let me clarify... it is not obvious (at least for me) what the
>> actually loadable kernel modules are at the moment. I rebuilt my
>> entire world and kernel
On 6/7/06, Petr Janda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When, NVIDIA out of question, what vga card/menufacturer has good 3d
acceleration and will work in DragonFly? ATI, Matrox etc?
Difficult question. DragonFly's kernel has direct rendering for a few
cards (including some of the older Radeon chips w
When, NVIDIA out of question, what vga card/menufacturer has good 3d
acceleration and will work in DragonFly? ATI, Matrox etc?
On 07.06.2006, at 12:37, Gergo Szakal wrote:
Let me clarify... it is not obvious (at least for me) what the
actually loadable kernel modules are at the moment. I rebuilt my
entire world and kernel just to compile bridging, pf and ALTQ into it
but I heard that it was a waste of time, since it is
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 17:56:42 +1000
"Dmitri Nikulin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 6/7/06, Gergo Szakal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey, I am here again, with my n00b questions. :-)
>> I would like to load smbfs support at boot time. How do I achieve it? i
>> cannot even load it after boot, I ge
On 6/7/06, Gergo Szakal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey, I am here again, with my n00b questions. :-)
I would like to load smbfs support at boot time. How do I achieve it? i cannot
even load it after boot, I get this:
# kldload smbfs
kldload: can't load smbfs: Exec format error
Any suggestions?
Hey, I am here again, with my n00b questions. :-)
I would like to load smbfs support at boot time. How do I achieve it? i cannot
even load it after boot, I get this:
# kldload smbfs
kldload: can't load smbfs: Exec format error
Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.
57 matches
Mail list logo
