On 8/25/2012 13:38, s...@bestmx.ru wrote:
Karthik Subramanian пишет:
Not a hammer expert - but in general directory hardlinks are bad
because they
can cause cycles in the directory tree.
yep. i just discovered that hammer simply prohibits directory hardlinks,
throwing a proper error message.
On 8/18/2012 00:44, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Wednesday 15 August 2012 13:35:23 John Marino wrote:
This was a full run, nothing was masked. We're over 11,700 packages for
now (96.4%). The build logs are available this time, see link below.
Most of the regressions have already been fixed
This was a full run, nothing was masked. We're over 11,700 packages for
now (96.4%). The build logs are available this time, see link below.
Most of the regressions have already been fixed by their maintainers and
Asterisk 10 should build cleanly next time.
John
pkgsrc bulk build report
This is an opinionated list of packages that are broken only on DragonFly
and we should want to see fixed. I'd like to see some people volunteer
to fix them, preferable somebody would wants to use the package
themselves. I'm sure people have a much different opinion of what is
top ten so please
On 8/13/2012 14:08, Jelle Hermsen wrote:
I can take a look at fixing Racket. Should I test on both df64 and df32?
Cheers,
Jelle
Jelle,
Yes, please.
The lang/* packages usually require extra scrutiny with regards to
platform. It's common to see a compiler work on i386 and not x86_64 and
On 8/13/2012 20:52, John Marino wrote:
As an update for everyone else:
net/xymon and net/xymonclient are now fixed.
Thanks to Francois Tigeot fixing poppler016, misc/koffice is also now
fixed along with graphics/kdegraphics3.
So I'd like to add sysutils/k3b (DVD and CD authoring program
On 8/7/2012 23:06, Justin Sherrill wrote:
If you follow the link in the message, it should take you to the HTML
report, which links to the build reports for each failed item. Or at
least it should; I can't check stuff easily from where I am right now.
On Aug 7, 2012 4:04 PM, Francois Tigeot
On 8/7/2012 22:04, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 10:08:37AM -0400, Justin Sherrill wrote:
pkgsrc bulk build report
Build failures
Package Breaks Maintainer
On 8/10/2012 13:11, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:53:17PM +0200, John Marino wrote:
Francois, do you have a patch for misc/libreoffice that I can commit
that disables font handling?
Disabling font handling is unthinkable! That would render the whole program
useless
On 8/7/2012 22:04, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 10:08:37AM -0400, Justin Sherrill wrote:
pkgsrc bulk build report
Build failures
Package Breaks Maintainer
On 8/10/2012 15:02, Francois Tigeot wrote:
Yes, I did disable these few tests permanently upstream. NetBSD is a fragile
platform from LO's point of view.
My philosophy are tests are for the packager.
E.g. I have a few compiler packages that have test capability. I run
the tests. Once I'm
On 8/7/2012 16:08, Justin Sherrill wrote:
I am in a spot with limited bandwidth, so I can't confirm this, but this
should have uploaded as pkgsrc-2012q2 on Avalon. I haven't had a i386
build complete yet. Hasn't crashed yet, though...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Charlie Root
On 7/23/2012 02:39, Pierre Abbat wrote:
1. When I run bc, I frequently edit the previous line and make a change:
15/56
.26785714285714285714
a(15/56)
.26171350240120506395
a(15/56)*45/a(1)
14.99507912917598589467
In Linux, I hit uparrow and edit the line. In DFBSD, I have to type the whole
line
On 7/20/2012 06:23, Edward M wrote:
hello,
trying to build seamonkey 2.10 from pkgsrc2012Q2
however, it fails with the following error:
pkg_create: lstat failed for file
lib/seamonkey/extensions/inpec...@mozilla.org/chrome/
icons/default/winInspectorMain.xpm: no such file or directory
On 7/20/2012 17:12, Stéphane Russell wrote:
Wojciech Puchar a écrit :
despite of an error message at startup is working fine, as long as
I'm not trying to configure it, since GConf is not working.
just use windows manager like cwm or fvwm2+your own configuration.
I for example use my 9 year
On 7/20/2012 20:53, Carsten Mattner wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Stéphane Russell
Complaining is important, but contributing platform support patches
(if you have the skills) would possibly be a better choice, wouldn't it?
Besides that statement also applying to yourself, the
I did a couple of pkgsrc bulk build runs this week. Recently the
PKG_DEVELOPER checks got more stringent and a single package,
help2man, caused 3500 package failures under the check!
After cleaning up the big regressions, here's a report. I used the data
in the report files to generate it, and
On 7/1/2012 15:07, Sascha Wildner wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 12:58:55 +0200, Jasse Jansson ja...@yberwaffe.com
wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to install dfly on two different computers right now and
it's not going well.
Case 1:
A 6-7 years old laptop (ASUS A6Km) just got an Fatal trap 12 after a
On 5/23/2012 19:54, John Marino wrote:
I submitted a number of patches that allow WINE to build on an
i386-DragonFly.
I don't have a desktop set up on this machine yet, so I can't actually
test it. If some user with an i386 setup has been looking forward to
wine on DragonFly, it would be great
I submitted a number of patches that allow WINE to build on an
i386-DragonFly.
I don't have a desktop set up on this machine yet, so I can't actually
test it. If some user with an i386 setup has been looking forward to
wine on DragonFly, it would be great if they could test it out and
Pkgsrc will occasionally maintain packages in the repository that no
longer have retrievable source tarballs and also legally restrict others
from hosting copies of them. The justification is that some older users
may still be in possession of the source tarballs, and the package is
On 5/19/2012 17:13, Justin Sherrill wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:29 AM, John Marinodragonfly...@marino.st wrote:
Personally I disagree with this philosophy. Pkgsrc packages should be
buildable by anyone as a minimum requirement for being a package, and if
this capability is lost, I
On 5/19/2012 15:08, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
Just for reference, can you point of some/all of these packages?
Thanks!
-- vs;
http://ops101.org/4k/
Hi Venkatesh,
The following eight packages were masked:
net/skype1
cad/simian
cad/simian-docs
sysutils/ipw-firmware
sysutils/iwi-firmware
On 5/20/2012 04:19, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Saturday 19 May 2012 12:00:31 John Marino wrote:
On 5/19/2012 15:08, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
Just for reference, can you point of some/all of these packages?
Thanks!
-- vs;
http://ops101.org/4k/
Hi Venkatesh,
The following eight packages were
On 5/14/2012 15:43, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Sepherosa Ziehausepher...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
For master users that use comconsole, please DO NOT upgrade your
system beyond following commit:
52f9ffcfb1a0e8fc03e584cd8ef8f66b7f71f884
Some commits between
On 4/5/2012 10:58, elekktrett...@exemail.com.au wrote:
While inspecting the html code to see whats causing it to load for about 3
minutes i found this -
iframe allowtransparency=true frameborder=0 scrolling=no
On 3/24/2012 02:48, peeter (must) wrote:
Thanks, this is very interesting. Could you describe your boot
setting, i.e. did you use GPT or MBR? Did you put /boot partition in a
separate GPT/MBR partition or was it in a big bsd slice? What
filesystem did DragonFly have?
I started with MBR, and
On 3/22/2012 00:29, peeter (must) wrote:
I wonder if there's a way to make refit recognize how to boot from the
dfly ufs partition? I was browsing around to find if grub2 might work
but haven't found the right .efi image yet.
mjg59.livejournal.com is a good read!
Peeter
--
Hi Peeter,
This
On 3/23/2012 1:46 PM, Justin Sherrill wrote:
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 3.1/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2012-03-20 02:35
Build end: 2012-03-23 10:18
Full report:
On 3/20/2012 03:22, Justin Sherrill wrote:
lang/ruby193-base is I thought fixed in pkgsrc-current, so either I
had an older flavor of pkgsrc-current downloaded when I started this,
or I screwed up.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 3.1/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build
On 3/11/2012 19:14, karim.allah.ah...@gmail.com wrote:
I've an Ubuntu machine ( oneiric ), Is it possible to cross-compile DFBSD ?
Thanks.
--
Karim Allah Ahmed.
LinkedIn http://eg.linkedin.com/pub/karim-allah-ahmed/13/829/550/
What is it exactly that you want to cross-compile?
The userland?
On 3/6/2012 17:35, Andrey N. Oktyabrski wrote:
Good day.
Today I tried to update 2.10 to 3.0 on my VPS. 3.0 do not boot. Have
anybody tested dfly on kvm? Is it possible to update, or I must use 2.10
there?
DFly 3.0.1 (i386) wouldn't boot on virtualbox until VT-x extensions were
enabled
On 3/1/2012 11:38 AM, Siju George wrote:
Hi,
I just complied from DragonFly_RELEASE_3_0 and I am running
3.0-RELEASE DragonFly v3.0.1.2.g19b92-RELEASE #3: Thu Mar 1 13:18:23
IST 2012.
I get these messages
pid 63230 (conftest), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
pid 73438 (conftest),
On 2/17/2012 6:38 AM, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
I don't know if it [KDE] installed completely in 2.10, come to think
of it.
The KDE versions in pkgsrc are grossly out of date. Users should
actually have better luck compiling newer KDE version by hand from the
KDE repo's directly,
On 1/31/2012 4:48 PM, Tim Darby wrote:
The build of handbrake fails as shown below. What do I need to do to get
this working?
A lot. You need to:
bmake clean
bmake patch
then go into the work directory and figure out why HB_NORMAL_PRIORITY
isn't defined. The normal cause of these things
On 1/18/2012 12:06 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
I did make -j 2 buildworld and make -j 2 buildkernel. The kernel and
world
I'm currently running are dated August 19.
Pierre
Are you running with a custom kernel config?
If so, try using the provided generic one.
I completely built world and
On 12/29/2011 4:32 AM, Edward Martinez wrote:
Hello,
When I execute shutdown -p now to turn off DragonFLyBSD, it freezes
right after syncing disks, done, uptime, on Powering system off using
ACPI. I need to hold the power button to
turn the system off. I'm using DragonFly
On 2010-07-30 Markus Pfeiffer wrote:
On 2010-07-06, Matthew Dillon dil...@apollo.backplane.com wrote:
:Dear all,
:
:I started using dragonfly not too long ago. I wanted to build w3m from
:pkgsrc on x86_64. Configure failed in a check for libgc, which is installed.
:I found out that libgc uses
On 12/8/2011 5:37 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Tuesday 06 December 2011 13:48:57 John Marino wrote:
Just apply this patch to print/lilypond/Makefile:
I tried that and got this error:
bmake
bmake: ../../mk/tools/../../mk/tools/replace.mk line 153: Malformed
conditional
The last good bulk build run for x86_64 current was Oct 28. Since then
two more runs have been performed resulting in thousands of failed
packages reported. They were caused by failures at the checksum phase
where *sometimes* the bulk build script could not find the digest. One
checksum
On 12/8/2011 5:37 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Tuesday 06 December 2011 13:48:57 John Marino wrote:
Just apply this patch to print/lilypond/Makefile:
I tried that and got this error:
bmake
bmake: ../../mk/tools/../../mk/tools/replace.mk line 153: Malformed
conditional
On 12/8/2011 8:44 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Thursday 08 December 2011 14:11:25 John Marino wrote:
Pierre, I'm seeing a similar message regarding gsed. Were you still on
the 2011Q3 branch when you got your message?
John
Yes. But I still can't compile it even when I replace replace.mk
On 12/8/2011 11:29 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Thursday 08 December 2011 15:11:45 John Marino wrote:
Are you really going to give up so easily after you got lilypond fixed?
I didn't get lilypond fixed. I have another box with lilypond on it, so it's
not urgent.
Pierre
you got lilypond
On 12/9/2011 12:48 AM, sweepslate wrote:
On 12/5/2011 10:04 PM, John Marino wrote:
If you just want to transfer a few files in and out, the easiest way is
through ftp through ssh (e.g. http://www.bitvise.com/tunnelier).
You didn't specify what you were trying to achieve. For my purposes
On 12/9/2011 2:50 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Thursday 08 December 2011 17:42:36 John Marino wrote:
you got lilypond fixed is another way of saying I gave you the patch
to fix it
You've got the patch. I told you how to work around the replace.mk
problem. I can't help more than that, you
On 12/6/2011 3:27 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Monday 05 December 2011 20:27:44 John Marino wrote:
I committed fixes for both Lilypond and kdesdk3. The pkgsrc-current
should build now.
The last two commits I see are to devel/opal and a very short change to the
list of changes. I'm on 2011Q3
On 12/5/2011 2:46 PM, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Pierre Abbat wrote:
Didn't work. I verified that FlexLexer.h is present:
/usr/include/c++/FlexLexer.h
/usr/pkg/include/FlexLexer.h
/usr/pkg/include/freehdl/FlexLexer.h
/usr/pkgsrc/devel/flex/work/flex-2.5.35/FlexLexer.h
On 12/5/2011 6:34 PM, sweepslate wrote:
I'm giving DragonFly a try, inside VirtualBox. The host OS is Windows XP
32-bit.
I want to share files between host and guest. How do I go about this?
If you just want to transfer a few files in and out, the easiest way is
through ftp through ssh (e.g.
On 12/5/2011 8:45 PM, John Marino wrote:
On 12/5/2011 2:46 PM, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Pierre Abbat wrote:
Didn't work. I verified that FlexLexer.h is present:
/usr/include/c++/FlexLexer.h
/usr/pkg/include/FlexLexer.h
/usr/pkg/include/freehdl/FlexLexer.h
/usr/pkgsrc/devel
On 12/4/2011 5:40 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Saturday 03 December 2011 21:01:28 Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Pierre Abbat wrote:
ERROR: Please install required programs: FlexLexer.h (flex package)
flex-2.5.35nb2 = Fast clone of lex(1), the lexical scanner generator
Maybe
On 11/15/2011 9:05 AM, Siju George wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:03 PM, John Marinodragonfly...@marino.st wrote:
BTW, that's not really a useful message. The useful message is in the
file /var/crash/core.text.X where X is the crash number of the saved
dump. Look in there for the 1-2 line
(forward to list)
On 11/15/2011 7:51 AM, Siju George wrote:
Hi,
I didn't receive any response to the core dump message i sent yesterday.
Should i be sending these messages to bugs instead? please let me know.
I have put the coredump at leaf:/home/sgeorge/crash/Coredump2015.tbz
My kernel
On 11/7/2011 3:05 PM, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
kaffe (from pkgsrc) seems to need gcc 4.1 to build correctly...
-- vs;
I would think that's either a problem with kaffe or a problem with the
gcc44 compiler. If it's the latter, the gcc44 compiler should be fixed
rather than use kaffe as a
On 11/7/2011 8:03 PM, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
pcc is not a candidate.
Sorry, I disagree, although I understand if you aren't going to be the
one to port it.
Sam
I don't understand that sentence. Are you saying you or somebody else
is going to port pcc into base? A compiler that don't do
On 11/8/2011 7:10 AM, joris dedieu wrote:
2011/11/8 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtadoi...@juanfra.info:
On 11/07/2011 10:50 PM, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
Our C++ dependencies would not be that difficult to overcome and I
do not see why the system compiler should necessarily have to
support pkgsrc
On 11/4/2011 5:43 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
200 Switching to Binary mode.
250 Directory successfully changed.
250-If you're looking for one of the FreeBSD releases, please look in the
250-releases/${ARCH}/${RELNAME} directory, where ARCH = alpha, amd64,
250-i386, ia64, pc98, or sparc64 and RELNAME
On 10/31/2011 10:01 AM, Alex Hornung wrote:
It is already telling you how to fix it: update your config.guess.
Cheers,
Alex
On 31/10/11 08:25, Siju George wrote:
Hi,
I got the following error trying to install File::RsyncP on
2.13-DEVELOPMENT DragonFly v2.13.0.76.g0a4d48-DEVELOPMENT
On 9/26/2011 3:33 PM, Justin Sherrill wrote:
I finally got a build of pkgsrc-current done; this was on x86_64. The
number 1 break is databases/postgresql84-client, from a packaging
error. I should have a new report in a few days since this initial
build is complete.
Justin,
I just pulled in
On 9/26/2011 8:49 PM, Justin Sherrill wrote:
This build started on the 17th, so I wouldn't have any additions newer
than that for postgresql84-client. The Build start line tells you
when this kicked off, which will be within a few minutes of when
pkgsrc was downloaded for the build.
I don't
On 9/12/2011 9:22 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 09:21:58PM -0400, Justin Sherrill wrote:
From what I've seen in the Problem Report system, there's a
'dfly-pkg-people' alias that DragonFly issues get placed with; if you
are in that group, you'll probably catch things
Hi @users,
With all my work upgrading gcc, binutils, rtld, and ELF handling, I was
invited to become a DragonFly developer earlier this year, which I was
honored to accept. A couple of months ago, the NetBSD foundation
extended a similar offer to me based on my work with Ada packages and
pkgsrc
On 7/25/2011 9:07 PM, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Ok, I upgraded rsync to the latest version and it appears to work now.
I think it might have been a protocol incompatibility between the
older rsync crater was running (2.something) verses the current version
3.0.8.
I will
I have been using pkgsrc from our git mirror (pkgsrcv2), but I recently
noticed some patches were missing as it caused me to submit a bad patch
to pkgsrc while fixing multimedia/xine-lib port, and since then I've
found many missing files.
I pulled pkgsrc via CVS and created a script to compare
Justin,
I just tried building libcanberra on x86_64 and it built and installed
just fine.
original error logs:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.11/20110603.0214/libcanberra-0.26nb1/
The current version in pkgsrc is libcanberra-0.26nb2 but I don't think
the pkg revision made a
On 7/16/2011 4:17 PM, John Marino wrote:
Justin,
I just tried building libcanberra on x86_64 and it built and installed
just fine.
original error logs:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.11/20110603.0214/libcanberra-0.26nb1/
The current version in pkgsrc is libcanberra-0.26nb2
Today I flipped a switch a switch which allows the gold linker to be
built with world. After the next build, you'll find it located at
/usr/libexec/binutils221/elf/ld.gold .
It is considered experimental at this point. Users of large C++
projects should see a large jump in compiling speed
This post has me so perplexed, I just have to explore further.
On 4/23/2011 2:15 AM, David Crosswell wrote:
Yes, I understand that. I'm looking forward to doing something with
Hammer, but I've spoken to a couple of guys at the local Users group
who swear they'll never use anything else but ZFS
Hi Sdävtaker,
Apparently your experience differs from mine. I've been running
Dragonfly i386 and Dragonfly x86_64 within Virtualbox for a year now,
and it works great. I've had no issues whatsoever, and that's on host
machines of both windows and Solaris. We've even found and fixed a
68 matches
Mail list logo
