Re: [Fwd: pkgbox64 pkgsrc DragonFly 2.5.1/x86_64 2009-10-16 21:12]
On Wed, October 21, 2009 12:19 pm, Saifi Khan wrote: > Justin, thats awesome piece of work. > > Do you think it is a good idea to "weigh" > build-fail/broken/masked packages against a usage list like > https://www.osscensus.org/packages-rank-public.php?offset=0&limit=778&page=0 That's a good idea for prioritizing needed fixes, but there's something in the existing reports that that I think mostly covers it. Most of the items with a high usage rate in the report you linked tend to have a high downstream dependency, so if they break, lots of other packages break. The email report that comes from a bulk build shows a list of the top packages who break other packages by not building, so we should be able to get a list of what needs to be done directly from there, and it should follow the same general pattern as that usage list.
Re: [Fwd: pkgbox64 pkgsrc DragonFly 2.5.1/x86_64 2009-10-16 21:12]
On Wed, October 21, 2009 12:36 pm, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > Justin C. Sherrill wrote: >> These should work for all amd64 versions, via pkgin or pkg_radd or >> manual >> download. The report didn't upload because of a permissions problem, >> which I've fixed and the next run (already started) should have an >> up-to-date report to accompany it. > > Do you think you can push the report still or is it too late? > > Are you performing incremental builds? Too late - it already has 3,500 packages since my post this morning, so I figured a delay of a day wouldn't hurt. Some of the broken packages match the existing i386 results, so these are not necessarily amd64-specific problems. The builds are incremental. This and the others took so long because it was the first 2009Q3 build.
Re: [Fwd: pkgbox64 pkgsrc DragonFly 2.5.1/x86_64 2009-10-16 21:12]
Justin C. Sherrill wrote: On Wed, October 21, 2009 12:36 pm, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: Justin C. Sherrill wrote: These should work for all amd64 versions, via pkgin or pkg_radd or manual download. The report didn't upload because of a permissions problem, which I've fixed and the next run (already started) should have an up-to-date report to accompany it. Do you think you can push the report still or is it too late? Are you performing incremental builds? Too late - it already has 3,500 packages since my post this morning, so I figured a delay of a day wouldn't hurt. Some of the broken packages match the existing i386 results, so these are not necessarily amd64-specific problems. The builds are incremental. This and the others took so long because it was the first 2009Q3 build. sweeet!
Re: [Fwd: pkgbox64 pkgsrc DragonFly 2.5.1/x86_64 2009-10-16 21:12]
Justin C. Sherrill wrote: These should work for all amd64 versions, via pkgin or pkg_radd or manual download. The report didn't upload because of a permissions problem, which I've fixed and the next run (already started) should have an up-to-date report to accompany it. Do you think you can push the report still or is it too late? Are you performing incremental builds? cheers simon
Re: [Fwd: pkgbox64 pkgsrc DragonFly 2.5.1/x86_64 2009-10-16 21:12]
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > Binary package build for DragonFly 2.5.x on amd64 has completed, with a > greater-than-I-expected number of packages building. > > Total number of packages: 8969 > Successfully built: 7475 > Failed to build: 359 > Depending on failed package: 574 > Explicitly broken or masked: 497 > Depending on masked package:64 > Justin, thats awesome piece of work. Do you think it is a good idea to "weigh" build-fail/broken/masked packages against a usage list like https://www.osscensus.org/packages-rank-public.php?offset=0&limit=778&page=0 Using that approach one can showcase certain apps that work/build exceptionally well on the DragonFlyBSD platform. Perhaps somebody may have already reflected on this and that is something not obvious to a newbie like me. thanks Saifi.
[Fwd: pkgbox64 pkgsrc DragonFly 2.5.1/x86_64 2009-10-16 21:12]
Binary package build for DragonFly 2.5.x on amd64 has completed, with a greater-than-I-expected number of packages building. It's at: http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/packages/amd64/DragonFly-2.5.1/stable/ These should work for all amd64 versions, via pkgin or pkg_radd or manual download. The report didn't upload because of a permissions problem, which I've fixed and the next run (already started) should have an up-to-date report to accompany it. Original Message Subject: pkgbox64 pkgsrc DragonFly 2.5.1/x86_64 2009-10-16 21:12 From:"Charlie Root" Date:Wed, October 21, 2009 7:50 am To: jus...@shiningsilence.com -- pkgsrc bulk build report DragonFly 2.5.1/x86_64 Compiler: gcc Build start: 2009-10-16 21:12 Build end: 2009-10-21 11:37 Full report: http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports//20091016.2112/meta/report.html Machine readable version: http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports//20091016.2112/meta/report.bz2 Total number of packages: 8969 Successfully built: 7475 Failed to build: 359 Depending on failed package: 574 Explicitly broken or masked: 497 Depending on masked package:64 Packages breaking the most other packages Package Breaks Maintainer - lang/ruby18-base 269 t...@netbsd.org print/ghostscript115 pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org lang/ocaml35 a...@netbsd.org lang/mono 29 kef...@netbsd.org graphics/evas 15 ya...@yazzy.org textproc/xerces-c 12 pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org x11/kdebase-workspace411 ma...@netbsd.org audio/mpg123 8 pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org www/w3m7 uebay...@netbsd.org math/gap 7 c...@netbsd.org Build failures Package Breaks Maintainer - archivers/star uebay...@netbsd.org audio/akode-plugins-mpc ha...@netbsd.org audio/bmp-macpkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org audio/buzztard 1 pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org audio/csound4pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org audio/libmusepack 1 pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org audio/maplay pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org audio/mpg123 8 pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org audio/py-id3lib pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org py26-id3lib-0.5.1pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org py25-id3lib-0.5.1pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org audio/tremor-tools ch...@netbsd.org benchmarks/iozonepkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org benchmarks/randread gr...@netbsd.org biology/py-mol pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org py26-mol-0.98nb4 pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org biology/rasmol pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org cad/atlc dmcmah...@netbsd.org chat/finch pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org chat/galepkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org chat/silc-client 1 s...@netbsd.org chat/silc-server s...@netbsd.org chat/tircpkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org chat/zircon pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org comms/asterisk16 jnem...@netbsd.org comms/conserver pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org comms/mgetty+sendfax pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org comms/modemd tsa...@netbsd.org comms/plptools pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org cross/h8300-hms-gcc pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org cross/i386-cygwin32 pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org cross/i386-linux pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org cross/i386-mingw32 pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org cross/i386-msdosdjgpppkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org cross/mipsEEel-netbsdpkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org databases/gnats re...@netbsd.org databases/openldap-smbk5pwd g...@netbsd.org databases/php-mssql1 jdole...@netbsd.org php4-mssql-4.4.9 1 jdole...@netbsd.org devel/binutils pkgsrc-us...@netbsd.org devel/compizconfig-backend-gconf
