I was talking about a way of saying things - with anger or rather attack.
You are & Matthias correct - I shouldn't have answer in this way.
Sorry for that, it was stupid and not mature.
--
Używam klienta poczty Opera Mail: http://www.opera.com/mail/
I was talking about a way of saying things - with anger or rather attack.
You are & Matthias correct - I shouldn't have answer in this way.
Sorry for that, it was stupid and not mature.
Dnia 27-09-2010 o 16:23:21 Przemysław Pawełczyk napisał(a):
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:06:20 +0200
klanger
* klanger wrote:
> After reading all entries written by Przemyslaw, I would rather
> shorten legendary "Shut up and hack!" to "Shut up!".
>
> Where is your "netiquette"?
You (!) should have a look at the netiquette. Even if one likes his
suggestions or not, its not polite to insult someone on a
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:06:20 +0200
klanger wrote:
> After reading all entries written by Przemyslaw, I would rather
> shorten legendary "Shut up and hack!" to "Shut up!".
>
> Where is your "netiquette"?
Clangor,
please do not hide yourself after your nick. Poles like you are known
(within Pole
After reading all entries written by Przemyslaw, I would rather shorten
legendary "Shut up and hack!" to "Shut up!".
Where is your "netiquette"?
---
I also don't like lynx & mc often doesn't even work (OTB) in cli under DF
/where it works fine in X/.
Our base ISO/IMG will always be small and will not have any bells
and whistles.
pkg_radd (via internet connectivity) is *the* official way to get
more packages installed after an installation. Trying to pack packages
onto CDs, DVDs, or large images has historically been a big
2010/9/24 Przemysław Pawełczyk :
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:06:40 +0200
> Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>
> (...)
>> >> Not at all - just because these tools are not in the base
>> >> system does not mean they're not easily available just install them
>> >> with pkg_radd or pkgin or build them yourself
Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:06:40 +0200
> Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>
>> And yes, lynx in OpenBSD base install is fine, but they have much more
>> developers and money from users so if you want it in Dfly then pay
>> someone or do it yourself or more simple - said in OpenBSD
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:38:02 -0400
Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Friday 24 September 2010 10:17:45 Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> > It's simple - you want mc and lynx, someone else wants bash and
> > vim, someone else wants links and emacs, another person wants TeX, and
> > screen ...
>
> I think th
On Friday 24 September 2010 10:17:45 Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> It's simple - you want mc and lynx, someone else wants bash and
> vim, someone else wants links and emacs, another person wants TeX, and
> screen ...
I think that the CD should have pkgin and install it. Any packages like mc an
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:06:40 +0200
Tomas Bodzar wrote:
(...)
> >> Not at all - just because these tools are not in the base
> >> system does not mean they're not easily available just install them
> >> with pkg_radd or pkgin or build them yourself
> >> (cd /usr/pkgsrc/sysutils/mc; bmake ins
2010/9/24 Przemysław Pawełczyk :
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:28:16 +0100
> "Steve O'Hara-Smith" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:07:50 +0200
>> Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:43:26 +0100
>> > Alex Hornung wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 24/09/10 13:37, Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:53:14 +0200
Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:28:16 +0100
> "Steve O'Hara-Smith" wrote:
>
> > The problem here is that it's an endless cycle which
> > culminates in an install that needs a blu-ray disc and comes with
> > everything under the sun pre
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:04:14 -0300
Sdävtaker wrote:
> > What about DF basic system software divided into sets similar to
> > sets found in OpenBSD?
>
> You got metapackages in pkg_src
>
> >> > "Sorry, but I simply did not fail to see that" DFBSD system might
> >> > gain having such tools distib
> What about DF basic system software divided into sets similar to sets
> found in OpenBSD?
You got metapackages in pkg_src
>> > "Sorry, but I simply did not fail to see that" DFBSD system might
>> > gain having such tools distibuted on its ISO and be the leader on
>> > the BSD trek of all BSD fl
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:27:20 -0600
"Samuel J. Greear" wrote:
> 2010/9/24 Przemysław Pawełczyk :
> > On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:43:26 +0100
> > Alex Hornung wrote:
> >
> >> On 24/09/10 13:37, Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote:
> >> > I know, and I would expect such answer. No offense please, but
> >> > for
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:28:16 +0100
"Steve O'Hara-Smith" wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:07:50 +0200
> Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:43:26 +0100
> > Alex Hornung wrote:
> >
> > > On 24/09/10 13:37, Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote:
> > > > I know, and I would expect such a
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:13:57 -0400
"Justin C. Sherrill" wrote:
> The error you saw was probably from a pkg_install version check; you
> can rebuild/upgrade it locally, and then things should work.
> pkg_install recently had a version check introduced where other
> packages won't be installed if t
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:07:50 +0200
Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:43:26 +0100
> Alex Hornung wrote:
>
> > On 24/09/10 13:37, Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote:
> > > I know, and I would expect such answer. No offense please, but for
> > > how long yet such attitude will prevail i
2010/9/24 Przemysław Pawełczyk :
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:43:26 +0100
> Alex Hornung wrote:
>
>> On 24/09/10 13:37, Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote:
>> > I know, and I would expect such answer. No offense please, but for
>> > how long yet such attitude will prevail in Unix community? It
>> > lingers fr
On Fri, September 24, 2010 8:37 am, PrzemysÅaw PaweÅczyk wrote:
> I know, and I would expect such answer. No offense please, but for how
> long yet such attitude will prevail in Unix community? It lingers from
> 80s of the last... Cenury of the last Millennium. ;-)
The LiveDVD image (dfly-gui-*
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:43:26 +0100
Alex Hornung wrote:
> On 24/09/10 13:37, Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote:
> > I know, and I would expect such answer. No offense please, but for
> > how long yet such attitude will prevail in Unix community? It
> > lingers from 80s of the last... Cenury of the last M
On 24/09/10 13:37, Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote:
> I know, and I would expect such answer. No offense please, but for how
> long yet such attitude will prevail in Unix community? It lingers from
> 80s of the last... Cenury of the last Millennium. ;-)
>
Sorry, but I simply fail to see why we need '
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:18:32 -0400
Joe Talbott wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:04:25PM +0200, Przemys??aw Pawe??czyk
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Three questions.
> >
> > 1. I opened DFBSD x64 ISO in latest Red Hat Linux (Scientific Linux
> > 5.5) under the control of Midnight Commander and saw
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:04:25PM +0200, Przemys??aw Pawe??czyk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Three questions.
>
> 1. I opened DFBSD x64 ISO in latest Red Hat Linux (Scientific Linux 5.5)
> under the control of Midnight Commander and saw the following entries
> within file lists (in MC panel):
>
> ...
> [
Hi,
Three questions.
1. I opened DFBSD x64 ISO in latest Red Hat Linux (Scientific Linux 5.5)
under the control of Midnight Commander and saw the following entries
within file lists (in MC panel):
...
[ -200 00 ] cpio
[ -201 00] mailq
etc
...
What does it mean?
2. Why there is no Lynx (te
26 matches
Mail list logo
