tps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8407
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8173
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> Hi,
> Did anyone look into this - is it already fixed? If not we should have
> a JIRA at least to investigate.
> Colm.
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 1:08
container). Please let me know what do you
think.
Thank you!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
TA> Yes. Thank you! I’m sure the answer is obvious. As we make more cxf
TA> functionality available, we'd prefer to use the native cxf configuration
TA> over our own programmatic configuration.
TA&g
-32fed2ec8d113792f680c2242ac6cb0cb67cfdd142660d993dbe92aaede00f6fR265
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
SB> Hey Andriy
SB> Great stuff, glad to hear, it is a collection of JAX-RS endpoints backed up
SB> by CXF, so the team needs some help to setup HTTPS, Basic (and possibly
SB> bearer JWT token verification g
Hi Tim & Sergey,
Yeah, sure, happy to help here. I think I understood the problem, will try to
look shortly on how to address that in context of Tika Server (I have never
used the server-based deployment of Tika yet).
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
SB> Hi Tim
SB> Apologies I'm totall
Also +1, I would like to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8022 in,
we are close to finish
it up (hope to merge tonight, worst case over weekend). I think planning for
release early next
week would be great.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
COh> Can this JIRA be resolved? ht
Congrats guys!!! This is a major milestone in the project's lifecycle, 10 years
(!!!), and there are
no signs it is going to stop any time soon!!! Kudos to every contributor and
every community member!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
DK> Hi,
DK> it's time to celebrate: 10 years ago, on
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7668 to track that.
If someone wants to pick it up right away, please feel free to do so.
Thanks, guys!
>> On Mar 5, 2018, at 2:07 PM, Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think this is very legitimate query. At some po
-bb05b5ab9309760c3271445278116a2f).
We could try to make 3.0 the base line (right now it is 3.1) and see if it
breaks something else besides NIO part. What do you think?
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
COh> Hi Andriy,
COh> What do you think of this query?
COh> Thanks,
COh> Colm.
COh> On We
Hey Sergey,
That would be ideal I think (move RxJava into separate module). RxJava2 and
RxJava are quite different frameworks, some people just stuck with RxJava so
we could support them there. Thanks.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
JDA> What about just leaving the old RxJava code in a mod
Sorry for delayed response, somehow missed this thread. Yes, we should be able
to discover features automatically when using CDI. The @Provider may not be
required, we rely on javax.ws.rs.core.Feature implementors instead. But John is
right, in the sample the SseFeature is manually registered
10 matches
Mail list logo
