around. Something like ignore JMSReplyTo would work as well.
Thanks,
Jens
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/JMS-Transport-Overriding-ReplyDestination-tp5731199.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
the JMSConfiguration but I need it the other
way around. Something like ignore JMSReplyTo would work as well.
Thanks,
Jens
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/JMS-Transport-Overriding-ReplyDestination-tp5731199.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive
this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/JMS-Transport-Overriding-ReplyDestination-tp5731199p5731212.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/JMS-Transport-Overriding-ReplyDestination-tp5731199p5731253.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Jul 22, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Jens smix...@dzbank.de wrote:
Daniel Kulp wrote
In this case I receive the request via a JMS proxy, and the original
ReplyTo queue is inaccessible to my service. Instead I need to send the
reply back to the proxy which will then forward it to the client (this
in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/JMS-Transport-Overriding-ReplyDestination-tp5731199p5731255.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Jul 22, 2013, at 7:09 AM, Jens smix...@dzbank.de wrote:
cschneider wrote
I don´t think this is possible at the moment. Can you explain your use
case in detail?
In this case I receive the request via a JMS proxy, and the original
ReplyTo queue is inaccessible to my service. Instead I
