[dpdk-users] Link Status App

2016-04-27 Thread Gadre Nayan
Dear All, I have started with DPDK library. I have some terminology related questions. 1. What are "lcores": My system has 2 sockets and 6 cores per socket. Are these internal cores --> lcores? So then my system will have 12 lcores? 2. I am trying to work on the Link status change

[dpdk-users] Link Status App

2016-04-27 Thread De Lara Guarch, Pablo
Hi GNA, > -Original Message- > From: users [mailto:users-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Gadre Nayan > Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 3:08 PM > To: users at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-users] Link Status App > > Dear All, > > I have started with DPDK library. I have some terminology

[dpdk-users] Link Status and Interrupts in 2.2.0

2016-04-27 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-25 11:49, martin_curran-gray at keysight.com: > But if the link was "active" when dpdk and my app starts up, > then no interrupt is generated, which then means that global > structure is not filled in You are describing the case of interrupts enabled but never called. It has been fixed in

[dpdk-users] DPDK QOS scheduler priority starvation issue

2016-04-27 Thread Dumitrescu, Cristian
Hi Ashok, I am not sure I understand what the issue is, as you do not provide the output rates. You mention pipe is configured with 400m (assuming 400 million credits), with pipe TC1 configured with 40m and TC3 with 400m, while input traffic is 100m for pipe TC1 and 500m for pipe TC3; to me,

[dpdk-users] DPDK QOS scheduler priority starvation issue

2016-04-27 Thread Ashok Padhy
Hi Cristian, Thanks for the response. The o/p rates are that TC1 carries only about 1bytes per sec, while TC3 carries ~400m. As I said the high priority traffic in TC1 is starved out by the low priority traffic in TC3. I want to re-emphasize the fact that, this issue shows up only when the