Re: [Users] meeting minutes for 2016-05-09

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:01:02AM +0200, Ian Hinder wrote: > I could add such an exclusion, but since it seems to work now and it > is better to test the main ubuntu optionlist, I think I will just > leave it as-is. Do you agree? Yes. Frank signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [Users] meeting minutes for 2016-05-09

Hello all, > We are now down to zero build slaves. I will investigate. I restarted the AEI one. The workstation the hosts the VM does not auto-start the VM when it is rebooted (due to a kernel update recently) and I had forgotten about it. It is not up and running again. Yours, Roland -- My

Re: [Users] meeting minutes for 2016-05-09

On 12/05/16 21:37, Frank Loeffler wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:00:40PM +0200, Eloisa Bentivegna wrote: >> this is really due to the fact that this specific variable >> (ct_multilevel-err) should not be tested for relative changes, as it's >> difficult to define a natural tolerance, and

Re: [Users] meeting minutes for 2016-05-09

On 12 May 2016, at 21:37, Frank Loeffler wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:00:40PM +0200, Eloisa Bentivegna wrote: >> this is really due to the fact that this specific variable >> (ct_multilevel-err) should not be tested for relative changes, as it's >> difficult to define