Hi,
without an hint on your error it's a bit difficult to help.
Stevens
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Pete Haidinyak javam...@cox.net wrote:
I am embedding Felix in an application I am porting and was playing around
with logging with Log4j. I wanted both the application and Felix to use
Hi,
It's seems, looking at the code, that it can be done more efficiently ...
Tokenizing filter and generating event to a handler will have my preference
like a SAX parser.
Stevens
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.orgwrote:
Thanks for creating the issue and
2009/3/6 Stevens Gestin sges...@gmail.com
Hi,
without an hint on your error it's a bit difficult to help.
yes, seeing the actual error or exception trace would be useful
as well as your settings for system packages / bootdelegation
also note that while OSGi attempts to isolate bundles,
Sorry about that, it was more of a question about the classloading than to
fix an issue. Anyway here is the error message...
D:\Annotation\felixjava -cp org.apache.log4j.jar;bin\felix.jar;.\conf
org.apache.felix.main.Main
Welcome to Felix.
=
- install
So you just have to add org.apache.log4j to Felix system packages
property.
Stevens
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Pete Haidinyak javam...@cox.net wrote:
Sorry about that, it was more of a question about the classloading than to
fix an issue. Anyway here is the error message...
No, that was one solution proposed to me was to not have the log4j bundle
and just expose it using the system packages extra.
-Pete
On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:53:40 -0800, Stevens Gestin sges...@gmail.com
wrote:
So you just have to add org.apache.log4j to Felix system packages
property.
2009/3/6 Pierre De Rop pierre.de_...@alcatel-lucent.fr
Hello everyone;
I have read the Richard's osgi presentation from
http://cwiki.apache.org/FELIX/presentations.data/osgi-berlin-20070321.pdf
and there is something in the slide 36 (OSGI R4 modularity details 4/7,
sophisticated class space
This seems very similar for me ... Someone can explain the difference?
Stevens
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Pete Haidinyak javam...@cox.net wrote:
No, that was one solution proposed to me was to not have the log4j bundle
and just expose it using the system packages extra.
-Pete
--
That is fine with me ... tell me what to do? I have no idea to be
linked with the maven repo. Maybe we can arrange this during EclispeCon.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
On 6 mrt 2009, at 08:59, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
2009/3/6 Peter Kriens peter.kri...@aqute.biz
Ouch, this is a
2009/3/6 Peter Kriens peter.kri...@aqute.biz
That is fine with me ... tell me what to do? I have no idea to be linked
with the maven repo. Maybe we can arrange this during EclispeCon.
Hi Peter - yes, it's a straightforward process:
Ok, got it.
Thanks Stuart
/pierre
Stuart McCulloch wrote:
2009/3/6 Pierre De Rop pierre.de_...@alcatel-lucent.fr
Hello everyone;
I have read the Richard's osgi presentation from
http://cwiki.apache.org/FELIX/presentations.data/osgi-berlin-20070321.pdf
and there is something in the slide
So, in the setup where you get the error is the system packages extra
containing the log4j packages exposed from the classloader that embeds
Felix?
If yes, then bundle 4 should not be there. Of course if bundle 4 is log4 itself.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Pete Haidinyak javam...@cox.net
From time to time I get the following exception when using Apache Felix SCR. I
am not yet sure if this is a problem of SCR or a framework bug. For me it
looks like a framework bug caused by the hashCode() function of
org.apache.felix.framework.ServiceReferenceImpl respectively
Yes, this is fixed in trunk.
regards,
Karl
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/6 alexander.ber...@finnova.ch
From time to time I get the following exception when using Apache Felix
SCR. I am not yet sure if this is a problem of SCR or a
alexander.ber...@finnova.ch said the following on 03/06/2009 12:04 PM:
[...] As to my understanding hashCode() should never throw an exception and
always return the same integer value for the same object instance. If this
contract is violated classes like HashMap will not work correctly,
2009/3/6 Reto Bachmann-Gmür reto.bachm...@trialox.org
alexander.ber...@finnova.ch said the following on 03/06/2009 12:04 PM:
[...] As to my understanding hashCode() should never throw an exception
and always return the same integer value for the same object instance. If
this contract is
Thanks for your immediate reply (all of you)
If it is already fixed in Trunk then I am happy. So this is my fault (was
looking at the source of 1.4.1), next time I will first check the Trunk before
taking your time.
P.S. Regarding the side note about the java-spec, Of course you are right. But
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:59 PM, alexander.ber...@finnova.ch wrote:
Thanks for your immediate reply (all of you)
If it is already fixed in Trunk then I am happy. So this is my fault (was
looking at the source of 1.4.1), next time I will first check the Trunk
before taking your time.
you
Perhaps you could create a JIRA issue and I could try to look into it.
I will probably need you to make a reproducible example available to me
somehow.
- richard
On 03/06/2009 03:08 AM, Kristian Köhler wrote:
Hi
I encountered problems while resolving rependencies via the bundle
repository.
Hi
I opened an issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-977
The attached file should reproduce the problem.
Thanks
Kristian
2009/3/6 Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org
Perhaps you could create a JIRA issue and I could try to look into it.
I will probably need you to make a
Well ... I'm using Mina, not Grizzly, for our server which is using NIO
also. It's lite and powerfull... There are so many projects and frameworks
that it's quite difficult to decide which one we can choose.
We are looking for a powerfull OSGI Http Service. I would like to test PAX
Web which
Also the Felix repo ...
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
On 6 mrt 2009, at 15:26, Richard S. Hall wrote:
I thought some people might find this interesting:
http://www.nabble.com/Grizzly-OSGi-Http-Service-Ready-for-testing-td22363119.html
- richard
On 03/06/2009 09:44 AM, Peter Kriens wrote:
Also the Felix repo ...
Well, the Felix repo only contains Felix subprojects...at least I think
that is the plan...
- richard
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
On 6 mrt 2009, at 15:26, Richard S. Hall wrote:
I thought some people might find
2500 Bundles ?
Where ?
2009/3/6 Peter Kriens peter.kri...@aqute.biz:
I think anything I can get :-) I got 2500 bundles now in OBR ...
Unfortunately, 99% is not documented :-(
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
On 6 mrt 2009, at 15:52, Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 03/06/2009 09:44 AM,
2009/3/6 Henri Gomez henri.go...@gmail.com
2500 Bundles ?
Where ?
here, I guess: http://www.osgi.org/Repository/HomePage
2009/3/6 Peter Kriens peter.kri...@aqute.biz:
I think anything I can get :-) I got 2500 bundles now in OBR ...
Unfortunately, 99% is not documented :-(
Kind
No, I haven't put anything in the system packages extra.
Thanks
-Pete
Alin Dreghiciu adreghi...@gmail.com wrote:
=
So, in the setup where you get the error is the system packages extra
containing the log4j packages exposed from the classloader that embeds
Felix?
If yes, then
Peter Kriens wrote:
I think anything I can get :-) I got 2500 bundles now in OBR ...
IC, I misunderstood. I thought you wanted Grizzly in Felix' repo.
- richard
Unfortunately, 99% is not documented :-(
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
On 6 mrt 2009, at 15:52, Richard S. Hall wrote:
On
Yes, we plan to support the new R4.2 HTTP service spec in GlassFish v3.
It will support war files being deployed as OSGi bundles. We already
have an initial implementation of existing OSGI/HTTP service in
GlassFish v3. The basic stuffs are working and I plan to finish it soon.
Sahoo
Richard
I am trying to figure out how to get EJB3 and JPA working within
felix. I have read a number of articles online, but am still a little
stumped. One thing that has come up that I can not seem to find an
answer to is that eclipseLink wants there to be a JPA-
PersistenceUnits: property in the
2009/3/7 Skinner Chad cskin...@topeka.k12.ks.us
I am trying to figure out how to get EJB3 and JPA working within felix. I
have read a number of articles online, but am still a little stumped. One
thing that has come up that I can not seem to find an answer to is that
eclipseLink wants there
I was also planning to create another implementation of Pax Web that
made use of Grizzly to implement the Pax Web extensions to HttpService
and people could decide between an jetty or grizzly based
implementation.
@Sahoo, can you point me to the R4.2 Http Service specs? Are they
based on RFC 66 -
Indeed, it was not in early draft 2. But I have an older copy of the
RFC. But I'm looking further to the early draft 3.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 3/6/09 3:02 PM, Alin Dreghiciu wrote:
I was also planning to create another implementation of
32 matches
Mail list logo
