At 02:08 PM 9/26/2011, you wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Jeremy J. Shapiro wrote (26-09-11 06:05)
1) What path do the dictionaries need to be locate such that LibreOffice
will consult them and enable one to add words to them?
Apart from what others told, you can have personal word lists.
See Tools > OPti
On 09/27/2011 06:11 PM, NoOp wrote:
> On 09/27/2011 05:45 PM, NoOp wrote:
>> On 09/27/2011 04:23 PM, NoOp wrote:
>>> On 09/27/2011 12:05 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>> ,,,
I am writing an AsciiDoc backend to produce ODF files directly from
AsciiDoc. I was also looking for a flat file im
On 09/27/2011 05:58 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, NoOp wrote:
>
>> On 09/27/2011 12:05 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>> ,,,
>>>
>>> I am writing an AsciiDoc backend to produce ODF files directly from
>>> AsciiDoc. I was also looking for a flat file importer. Currently
>>> LibreOffice and Op
On 09/27/2011 05:45 PM, NoOp wrote:
> On 09/27/2011 04:23 PM, NoOp wrote:
>> On 09/27/2011 12:05 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>> ,,,
>>>
>>> I am writing an AsciiDoc backend to produce ODF files directly from
>>> AsciiDoc. I was also looking for a flat file importer. Currently
>>> LibreOffice and OpenO
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, NoOp wrote:
On 09/27/2011 12:05 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
,,,
I am writing an AsciiDoc backend to produce ODF files directly from
AsciiDoc. I was also looking for a flat file importer. Currently
LibreOffice and OpenOffice want to open such a .fodt (or .xml) file as
text rather
On 09/27/2011 04:23 PM, NoOp wrote:
> On 09/27/2011 12:05 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> ,,,
>>
>> I am writing an AsciiDoc backend to produce ODF files directly from
>> AsciiDoc. I was also looking for a flat file importer. Currently
>> LibreOffice and OpenOffice want to open such a .fodt (or .xml) fi
On 09/26/2011 11:21 AM, Rev. Nick Sharp wrote:
> Thanks - that did the trick.
>
> N
You are most welcome Rev.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
On 09/27/2011 12:05 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
,,,
>
> I am writing an AsciiDoc backend to produce ODF files directly from
> AsciiDoc. I was also looking for a flat file importer. Currently
> LibreOffice and OpenOffice want to open such a .fodt (or .xml) file as
> text rather than an pure ODF file.
Your use case is very practical and very desirable.
And yes, producing a single-file ODF document (XML format) would work
great for similar applications, including creation of feature-test
documents, etc.
There are major practical reasons why the single-file XML format
is not the default format.
Le 27/09/2011 16:57, Mihamina Rakotomandimby a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I inserted a lot of "new page" (with Ctrl+Enter) in a Writer document.
> I would like to clear them all: replace them with a simple "newline".
>
> How to "find & replace" them all?
>
You can use regular expressions (look at thi
"dave boland" wrote in message
news:1317127470.13576.140258148244...@webmail.messagingengine.com...
Using Usenet newsgroups (regular newsgroups as opposed to web based
newsgroups) are easier to use. The others are a pain in the ass and I
don't use them. Yes, I know Ubuntu has both, but I don'
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, planas wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 14:41 +0100, e-letter wrote:
Is there a logical reason why xslt filters need to be selected
manually for installation? Flat xml file formats are a very good
feature, especially for document version control. Why is flat xml not
the defaul
Guillaume wrote (27-09-11 18:01)
Any idea ?
- Put cursor in it
- Shift-Arrow down (or up)
- Shift-Arrow up (or down)
.. ?
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-hel
Any idea ?
Now you can find the example file here :
http://ca47.fr/LibreOfficeSampleCheckTableCell.odt
http://ca47.fr/LibreOfficeSampleCheckTableCell.odt
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/writer-How-to-check-a-whole-table-cell-tp3313397p3373065.html
Sent fro
Regina
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 17:22 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi planas,
>
> planas schrieb:
> > On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 14:41 +0100, e-letter wrote:
> >
> >> Readers,
> >>
> >> Is there a logical reason why xslt filters need to be selected
> >> manually for installation? Flat xml file forma
Hi planas,
planas schrieb:
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 14:41 +0100, e-letter wrote:
Readers,
Is there a logical reason why xslt filters need to be selected
manually for installation? Flat xml file formats are a very good
feature, especially for document version control. Why is flat xml not
the defa
Hello,
I inserted a lot of "new page" (with Ctrl+Enter) in a Writer document.
I would like to clear them all: replace them with a simple "newline".
How to "find & replace" them all?
--
RMA.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreo
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 14:41 +0100, e-letter wrote:
> Readers,
>
> Is there a logical reason why xslt filters need to be selected
> manually for installation? Flat xml file formats are a very good
> feature, especially for document version control. Why is flat xml not
> the default file format fo
Hi "e-letter",
e-letter schrieb:
Readers,
Is there a logical reason why xslt filters need to be selected
manually for installation? Flat xml file formats are a very good
feature, especially for document version control. Why is flat xml not
the default file format for LO?
I think, that flat x
On 09/27/2011 03:44 PM, dave boland wrote:
that is the job of LO support.
Uh! I see...
With that, my participation in this thread is over.
You just throw your shit and go away? Nice.
--
RMA.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.
Readers,
Is there a logical reason why xslt filters need to be selected
manually for installation? Flat xml file formats are a very good
feature, especially for document version control. Why is flat xml not
the default file format for LO?
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@glo
The only big thing for me for downloading the next version is the fact
that the newer versions tend to do the .docx and the .xltx reading
better than the older ones. I think 3.4.x line may do it better than
the 3.3.x line, of so I have heard.
So I kept 3.4.1 on my Ubuntu 10.04 desktop, and
Using Usenet newsgroups (regular newsgroups as opposed to web based
newsgroups) are easier to use. The others are a pain in the ass and I
don't use them. Yes, I know Ubuntu has both, but I don't use the web
based stuff. An no, I'm not going to start one -- that is the job of LO
support.
With tha
Thanks all who replied.
On 26 September 2011 18:05, Manfred J. Krause
wrote:
>
> please have a look at the bug report (only 91 comments) ... ;)
>
Yes, you're quite correct it's
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37195.
I should have looked further.
In my case copying:
%PROGRAMFILES%\
"dave boland" wrote in message
news:1317088585.19753.140258148080...@webmail.messagingengine.com...
I can get gmane to list all of the subscribed LO newsgroups and it
contains all of the messages in this thread. Not sure how that
happened, but... I'm not able to post to the group though, so
Hi Ken :)
Ken Springer-3 wrote:
>
> I was going to ask you a question, but ...
>
A question about wiki editing is a little off-topic for this thread but
perhaps start a new topic / ask a new question? The Documentation List is
probably a more appropriate place to ask but there are more people
Hi :)
I think people get confused about the difference between updates and
upgrades. I think of updates as being things that get added to an existing
install. Whereas an upgrade is a new version that tends to be better as a
fresh install and tends to take over from the old version. It's a very
b
27 matches
Mail list logo
