@global.libreoffice.org users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Saturday, 27 July 2013, 11:46
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
If we have to beat Microsoft then we need to focus only on what Microsoft
provides and not on .odt format, etc. We cannot beat Microsoft by
introducing a new format and expecting customers
Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: la10...@iperbole.bologna.it la10...@iperbole.bologna.it;
users@global.libreoffice.org users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Saturday, 27 July 2013, 11:46
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
If we have to beat Microsoft then we need to focus only on what
:)
*From:* Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za
*To:* Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
*Cc:* users@global.libreoffice.org
*Sent:* Wednesday, 31 July 2013, 23:01
*Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Hi Tom
Ah
:* users@global.libreoffice.org
*Sent:* Wednesday, 31 July 2013, 23:01
*Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Hi Tom
Ah Ok, I see, this is the same methodology I'm using. I generally
turn off the swap file for a badly defragged drive, including any
hibernation files etc
Please don't send to me directly, I'm on the list.
Thanks
On 2013-08-01 7:44 AM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
Hi Tanstaafl
Yes, a good choice, I forgot about UltraDefrag.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 01/08/2013 01:26 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Someone had asked about a free/FOSS
Apologies Tanstaafl, I replied to all. I must have replied directly to
you as well as the list
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 01/08/2013 01:51 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Please don't send to me directly, I'm on the list.
Thanks
On 2013-08-01 7:44 AM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
Hi
And you did it again.
Best is to use an email client that actually supports Reply-To-List
(like Thunderbird).
On 2013-08-01 8:11 AM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
Apologies Tanstaafl, I replied to all. I must have replied directly to
you as well as the list
Regards
Andrew Brown
: Thursday, 1 August 2013, 13:36
Subject: Re: OT: Defraggers...Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
And you did it again.
Best is to use an email client that actually supports Reply-To-List
(like Thunderbird).
On 2013-08-01 8:11 AM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
Apologies Tanstaafl, I replied
Heh! Heh! yes force of habit clicking Reply All when I see multiple
names, instead of Reply to list as I have done now, and I do use
Thunderbird :-P
Andrew Brown
On 01/08/2013 02:36 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
And you did it again.
Best is to use an email client that actually supports
:)
From: Virgil Arrington cuyfa...@hotmail.com
To: Amit Choudhary contact.amit.choudhary.in...@gmail.com;
users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 29 July 2013, 20:30
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
I certainly hope the primary motive for FOSS
2013, 11:36
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Amit
Your knowledge of the document standards is limited by your reply here.
This issue of the document standards and naming convention was covered
by a world body of multinationals and the preservation of all things in
human digital text etc
Sent: Wednesday, 31 July 2013, 8:48
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Hi Tom
Interesting post. Agree, sometimes these software wars becomes irksome,
as my late mother and father used to say and raised us with this motto
how do you know you don't like it if you have not tried
...@hotmail.com;
users@global.libreoffice.org
*Sent:* Wednesday, 31 July 2013, 8:48
*Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Hi Tom
Interesting post. Agree, sometimes these software wars becomes
irksome,
as my late mother and father used to say and raised us
:)
From: Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za
To: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, 31 July 2013, 23:01
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Hi Tom
Ah Ok, I see, this is the same methodology I'm using. I generally
:)
*From:* Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za
*To:* Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
*Cc:* users@global.libreoffice.org
*Sent:* Wednesday, 31 July 2013, 23:01
*Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Hi Tom
Ah Ok, I see, this is the same methodology I'm using. I generally
Agreed Paul
Amit, sn increasing or high revenue stream can indicate that the prices
of the saleable goods have increased (and in my country a fact, up 30%
on software and hardware in the last three months), currency
fluctuations and exchange rates between source manufacturing country and
...@hotmail.com
To: Amit Choudhary contact.amit.choudhary.in...@gmail.com;
users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 29 July 2013, 20:30
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
I certainly hope the primary motive for FOSS such as LO is not a disdain for
MS. I personally don't care how much money
contact.amit.choudhary.in...@gmail.com
To: Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za
Cc: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk; la10...@iperbole.bologna.it;
users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 29 July 2013, 9:33
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
Amit
Your knowledge of the document standards is limited by your reply here.
This issue of the document standards and naming convention was covered by a
world body of multinationals and the preservation of all things in
I too am an end user and not a developer. From my perspective it is not at
all difficult to generally keep up to date with the latest software
(although the 4.1. desktop-integration thing threw me for a while). All new
releases are clearly badged: don't use on production machines. So don't
Hi Amit
I understand where you are coming from, and the good news is, in your
favour, that MS in both it's O/S and office suite are losing market
share in a big way. Here's an article from Ubuntu founder and my
countryman Mark Shuttelworth on his take on MS and Ubuntu. I like his
statement
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
Hi Amit
I understand where you are coming from, and the good news is, in your
favour, that MS in both it's O/S and office suite are losing market share
in a big way. Here's an article from Ubuntu founder and my
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Amit Choudhary
contact.amit.choudhary.in...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
Hi Amit
I understand where you are coming from, and the good news is, in your
favour, that MS in both it's O/S and office
Hi Amit,
Revenues and profits (and shares for that matter), are not the same as
market share. Just because revenue is increasing, doesn't mean they
aren't losing market share. If they are losing market share, it
just means their revenue isn't increasing as much as it could be.
So I'm not sure
for
productive action.
Virgil
-Original Message-
From: Amit Choudhary
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 10:47 AM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Amit Choudhary
contact.amit.choudhary.in...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul
On 29/07/13 20:30, Virgil Arrington wrote:
I certainly hope the primary motive for FOSS such as LO is not a
disdain for MS. I personally don't care how much money MS makes. I
hope the LO developers are motivated by a desire to produce a great
product that can be used worldwide. Hatred usually
On 27/07/13 17:28, Ernie Kurtz wrote:
Hi Amit and Paul and . . .
I am just an ordinary user -- historian by training, academic researcher in medicine by
profession. I, and most with whom I work and come into contact, wish for, hope for, and
strongly prefer stable releases in a work
:)
From: la10...@iperbole.bologna.it la10...@iperbole.bologna.it
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 10:31
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Unfortunately, the 3rd digit rule doesn't work as goog as expected...
I use report builder
: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Unfortunately, the 3rd digit rule doesn't work as goog as expected...
I use report builder in base, 4.0.3.3 version. Download 4.0.4 and
report builder no more works (crash in opening).
thanks anyway for developers work, I remember this is a free sw, at
the
end
@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 10:31
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Unfortunately, the 3rd digit rule doesn't work as goog as
expected...
I use report builder in base, 4.0.3.3 version. Download 4.0.4
and
report builder no more works (crash in opening
:)
From: la10...@iperbole.bologna.it la10...@iperbole.bologna.it
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 10:31
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Unfortunately, the 3rd digit rule doesn't work as goog as expected...
I use report
la10...@iperbole.bologna.it
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 10:31
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Unfortunately, the 3rd digit rule doesn't work as goog as expected...
I use report builder in base, 4.0.3.3 version. Download 4.0.4 and
report builder
, 26 July 2013, 10:31
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Unfortunately, the 3rd digit rule doesn't work as goog as expected...
I use report builder in base, 4.0.3.3 version. Download 4.0.4 and
report builder no more works (crash in opening).
thanks anyway for developers work, I
Hi Paul,
Please find my answers below.
Regards,
Amit
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Paul paulste...@afrihost.co.za wrote:
Hi Amit,
While your CV is impressive, this is still just your opinion. For open
source software, it seems that this isn't true. Release early and
release often is a
July 2013, 10:31
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Unfortunately, the 3rd digit rule doesn't work as goog as expected...
I use report builder in base, 4.0.3.3 version. Download 4.0.4 and
report builder no more works (crash in opening).
thanks anyway for developers work, I
@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 10:31
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Unfortunately, the 3rd digit rule doesn't work as goog as expected...
I use report builder in base, 4.0.3.3 version. Download 4.0.4 and
report builder no more works (crash in opening).
thanks
:)
From: la10...@iperbole.bologna.it la10...@iperbole.bologna.it
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 10:31
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Unfortunately, the 3rd digit rule doesn't work as goog as
expected
Amit wrote:
The main problem here is that the user does not know wheher the next
release is more stable than previous one or not. And the user will get
caught in the conflict in the sense that he will think that may be if he
does not upgrade then he might be losing out on some features. This
Hi Virgil,
Just to comment on one aspect:
It appears to me as if, with LO, we users are doing the testing that
commercial companies do in-house.
Well, yes, kind of. You see, the open source world doesn't have lots of
paid developers to do this sort of testing, so it does in part rely on
the
:)
From: la10...@iperbole.bologna.it la10...@iperbole.bologna.it
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 10:31
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Unfortunately, the 3rd digit rule doesn't work as goog as expected...
I use report builder
A customer can compromise on fetaures but not on stability
Actually, from what I've gathered from this list, it seems the problems
half the time are new features that users want, and half the time bugs.
Well, maybe not exactly a 50-50 split, but still. Yes, there are a few
complaints about
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Amit Choudhary
contact.amit.choudhary.in...@gmail.com wrote:
A customer can compromise on fetaures but not on stability
Actually, from what I've gathered from this list, it seems the problems
half the time are new features that users want, and half the time
@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 3:35
Subject: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Hi,
I was using 4.0.2 and then I downloaded 4.0.3 but 4.0.3 is not as stable as
4.0.2. So, now I am downloading 4.0.4.
I am more interested in stable and feature rich (optional) software rather
than frequently released
contact.amit.choudhary.in...@gmail.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org Users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 3:35
Subject: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Hi,
I was using 4.0.2 and then I downloaded 4.0.3 but 4.0.3 is not
as stable as
4.0.2. So, now I am downloading 4.0.4.
I am
:)
From: Amit Choudhary contact.amit.choudhary.in...@gmail.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org Users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 3:35
Subject: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Hi,
I was using 4.0.2 and then I downloaded
: la10...@iperbole.bologna.it la10...@iperbole.bologna.it
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 10:31
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
Unfortunately, the 3rd digit rule doesn't work as goog as expected...
I use report builder in base, 4.0.3.3 version. Download 4.0.4
Hi,
I was using 4.0.2 and then I downloaded 4.0.3 but 4.0.3 is not as stable as
4.0.2. So, now I am downloading 4.0.4.
I am more interested in stable and feature rich (optional) software rather
than frequently released software.
Stablility is very important because a non-stable software /
2013, 2:15
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3 64-bit DEB removed my extensions, but
Windows version did notI
Here is the error I got when I tried to install 4.0.3 on an Ubuntu 13.04
with MATE de.
I installed the files without errors till I got to the
desktop-integration part.
Here
YES, it works for you but I am not using Unity.
How many users with MATE are having the same issues?
Do anyone using KDE or the other desktop have any issues.
I know that there has been work done to make the DEB install work
properly with Unity.
Has there been any work to make sure it works as
On 05/10/2013 07:05 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
YES, it works for you but I am not using Unity.
How many users with MATE are having the same issues?
Do anyone using KDE or the other desktop have any issues.
Honestly in this case it's unlikely that the DE is the issue as this is
really
Hopefully there are some folks out there who are using the other
desktops who can help you and give you some feedback. I don't know
anybody who is using them to check with. Sorry.
On 05/10/2013 10:05 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
YES, it works for you but I am not using Unity.
How many
Here is the error I got when I tried to install 4.0.3 on an Ubuntu 13.04
with MATE de.
I installed the files without errors till I got to the
desktop-integration part.
Here is the listing from the terminal.
I just installed 4.0.3 on two systems
The 64-bit DEB install removed my extensions and the persona I has setup.
The Windows install did not do this.
Any idea way the 64-bit DEB install in Ubuntu 12.04 would remove my
added items, but Windows did not?
I do not know if it is a bug, or not.
On 05/09/2013 03:40 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
I just installed 4.0.3 on two systems
The 64-bit DEB install removed my extensions and the persona I has setup.
The Windows install did not do this.
Any idea way the 64-bit DEB install in Ubuntu 12.04 would remove my
added items, but
Fedora 18. Previous version 4.0.2.2.
tar.gz downloaded via bit torrent from website. All good
On 05/10/2013 07:16 AM, Dan Lewis wrote:
On 05/09/2013 03:40 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
I just installed 4.0.3 on two systems
The 64-bit DEB install removed my extensions and the persona I
On 05/09/2013 05:16 PM, Dan Lewis wrote:
On 05/09/2013 03:40 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
I just installed 4.0.3 on two systems
The 64-bit DEB install removed my extensions and the persona I has
setup.
The Windows install did not do this.
Any idea way the 64-bit DEB install in Ubuntu
Hi,
I installed LO 4.0.3.3 on two machines running Ubuntu 13.04 with Unity
today. I always download LO from the LO site, extract it to the desktop,
and then run the following commands in the terminal:
1. sudo apt-get remove libreoffice*.*
2. sudo dpkg -i
I extract them to the /home folder
then rename it to Lib
then I
cd Lib
cd DEBS
then
sudo dpkg -i *.deb
I tend to not run an command on a folder that I am not in.
I learned that in my mainframe days as a safety feature.
So far, I have installed it on Ubuntu 12.04 and 13.04 with MATE
I installed LO 4.0.3.3 tonight on a third computer, also with Ubuntu
13.04 and with Unity. No problems there either.
On 05/09/2013 08:19 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
I extract them to the /home folder
then rename it to Lib
then I
cd Lib
cd DEBS
then
sudo dpkg -i *.deb
I
Tom :)
From: Don Myers donmy...@myersfarm.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013, 3:25
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3 64-bit DEB removed my extensions, but
Windows version did notI
I installed LO 4.0.3.3 tonight on a third
60 matches
Mail list logo
