On 9/10/2011 12:53 AM, planas wrote:
David
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 23:32 -0400, David B Teague sr wrote:
I run W7 64 bit, 4 gig RAM.
jre-6u19-windows-i586-s.exe
I have three questions: Do I want to install LO 3.4.3 or LO 3.3.4?
SNIP
Many thanks for your useful and informative response.
Then
On 09/10/2011 11:30 AM, David B Teague sr wrote:
On 9/10/2011 12:53 AM, planas wrote:
David
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 23:32 -0400, David B Teague sr wrote:
I run W7 64 bit, 4 gig RAM.
jre-6u19-windows-i586-s.exe
I have three questions: Do I want to install LO 3.4.3 or LO 3.3.4?
SNIP
Many
On 9/10/2011 11:52 AM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote:
I keep hearing that the newer version may be slower to do the work.
As for version 7, I have not used it. Linux version appear to use
OpenJDK instead of the normal Oracle JRE. They have it part of their
repositories, but
I run W7 64 bit, 4 gig RAM.
jre-6u19-windows-i586-s.exe
I have three questions: Do I want to install LO 3.4.3 or LO 3.3.4? Why?
and
OO.o was available with or without Java in the installer. The Java
Runtime with OO.o was always old, so I always fetched the OO.o
installation without Java
David
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 23:32 -0400, David B Teague sr wrote:
I run W7 64 bit, 4 gig RAM.
jre-6u19-windows-i586-s.exe
I have three questions: Do I want to install LO 3.4.3 or LO 3.3.4?
The two series are very similar and stable. 3.3.4 tends to favor a
slightly more conservative
