On Sunday 01 April 2012 01:58, Andreas Säger wrote:
[snip]
> > The more that state odf is the choice if we want proper open
> > standards the better so please publicise on relevant lists.
>
> Who cares? OOXML is a standard and I've heard of some compatible
> freeware. I think it was named Liber Off
Am 31.03.2012 20:19, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi Andreas :)
This seems to be a somewhat inconsistent message from you. I thought you
wanted people to be allowed to use ODF formats?
Regards from
Tom :)
Meanwhile I find amusing how you do not read other people's statements.
However, it is a major a
On 31/03/2012, Andreas Säger wrote:
> Am 30.03.2012 12:28, Tom Davies wrote:
>>
>>
>> --- On Fri, 30/3/12, Ian Lynch wrote:
>>
>> It seems Microsoft is lobbying the UK Cabinet office for OOXML in place of
>> odf
>> http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/public-sector/2012/03/microsoft-redeploys-ooxm
standards and
UK gov use of odf
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Saturday, 31 March, 2012, 14:58
Am 30.03.2012 12:28, Tom Davies wrote:
>
>
> --- On Fri, 30/3/12, Ian Lynch wrote:
>
> It seems Microsoft is lobbying the UK Cabinet office for OOXML in place of
> odf
> http://w
Am 30.03.2012 12:28, Tom Davies wrote:
--- On Fri, 30/3/12, Ian Lynch wrote:
It seems Microsoft is lobbying the UK Cabinet office for OOXML in place of
odf
http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/public-sector/2012/03/microsoft-redeploys-ooxml-in-o.html
Anyone that has a point of view can respon
