Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2011-01-01 Thread Italo Vignoli
On 12/31/2010 11:38 PM, Richard L. Hess wrote: I think it would be clearer if the above wonderful statement read: TDF is FOR and NOT AGAINST: FOR free software, FOR the user, FOR document freedom, FOR open standards, and NOT AGAINST proprietary software, NOT AGAINST corporations, NOT AGAINST

Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-31 Thread Richard L. Hess
On 2010-12-31 8:18 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote: TDF is FOR and not AGAINST: FOR free software, FOR the user, FOR document freedom, FOR open standards, and not AGAINST proprietary software, AGAINST corporations, AGAINST document lock in, AGAINST closed document formats and standards. Hi, Italo, I

Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-31 Thread Italo Vignoli
On 12/31/2010 08:29 AM, Mark wrote: If you're here to help, help. If not, go away. No one is forcing you to be here. A little etiquette would not hurt you one bit, either. Thanks, Marc. You are a wise guy. Thanks for stepping in with your gentle reminder of a netiquette that should be implic

Re: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-31 Thread Sigrid Carrera
Hi Kate, 2010/12/31 Katheryne Draven : > Fuck off all of you. How's that? That's not the kind of language, that we all want to see here. I am not a moderator of this list and I don't have any other authority here, but I don't like this attitude you're showing here. I fully agree with the stateme

Re: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-30 Thread Mark
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Katheryne Draven wrote: > Fuck off all of you. How's that? > What is your purpose in being here at all? You have posted a few good ideas, but when you spout off with absurd criticisms of OSs that have little or nothing to do with LibreOffice as a product, suddenl

Re: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-30 Thread Katheryne Draven
I was told this was just a bunch of losers living in their mother's basements, still I thought I'd give a chance. They were right. On 12/31/10, Robert Holtzman wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 04:36:58AM +, Katheryne Draven wrote: >> Fuck off all of you. How's that? > > Yup. Troll. NoOp was r

Re: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-30 Thread Robert Holtzman
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 04:36:58AM +, Katheryne Draven wrote: > Fuck off all of you. How's that? Yup. Troll. NoOp was right. -- Bob Holtzman Key ID: 8D549279 "If you think you're getting free lunch, check the price of the beer" -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice

Re: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-30 Thread Robert Holtzman
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 05:48:20PM -0800, Mark wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 06:46:58AM +, Katheryne Draven wrote: > >> I"m not spreading FUD, I'm speaking from my experience. When I tried > >> to introduce linux via ubuntu, it was

Re: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-30 Thread Katheryne Draven
Fuck off all of you. How's that? On 12/31/10, Mark wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 06:46:58AM +, Katheryne Draven wrote: >>> I"m not spreading FUD, I'm speaking from my experience. When I tried >>> to introduce linux via ubuntu, it

Re: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-30 Thread Mark
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 06:46:58AM +, Katheryne Draven wrote: >> I"m not spreading FUD, I'm speaking from my experience. When I tried >> to introduce linux via ubuntu, it was a disaster. >> >> However, given the amount of harsh/childish

Re: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-30 Thread Robert Holtzman
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 06:46:58AM +, Katheryne Draven wrote: > I"m not spreading FUD, I'm speaking from my experience. When I tried > to introduce linux via ubuntu, it was a disaster. > > However, given the amount of harsh/childish comments (not you Tom) > I'll keep my experiences to myself.

Re: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-29 Thread Katheryne Draven
e not had > problems with stability in Ubuntu. > > Regards from > Tom :) > > > > > > From: Robert Holtzman > To: users@libreoffice.org > Sent: Wed, 29 December, 2010 23:29:11 > Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-29 Thread Tom Davies
users@libreoffice.org Sent: Wed, 29 December, 2010 23:29:11 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 03:47:52PM -0500, Katheryne Draven wrote: > People, the ubuntus are inherently inferior versions of linux and have > a tendency to crash often, especially if the g

Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-29 Thread Robert Holtzman
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 03:47:52PM -0500, Katheryne Draven wrote: > People, the ubuntus are inherently inferior versions of linux and have > a tendency to crash often, especially if the gui is gnome. Please take > this into consideration, first look at the environment before the > application. Hey

Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-29 Thread Mark
In an effort to avoid a genuinely stupid religious war, I'm going to pass on your unnecessary personal opinion of Linux and GDM distributions. It is irrelevant. The particular PowerPoint show, which LO should run without crashing anything, regardless of what the underlying OS, distribution or GDM

Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-29 Thread Katheryne Draven
People, the ubuntus are inherently inferior versions of linux and have a tendency to crash often, especially if the gui is gnome. Please take this into consideration, first look at the environment before the application. Kate Draven CyberPunk X Computers On 12/28/10, Michel-André wrote: > If wor

Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-28 Thread Michel-André
If worse comes to worse, boot with a live CD and copy your VM directory for the critical machine to another machine. Michel-André ** Le 2010-12-28 20:29, Greg Madden a écrit : On Tuesday 28 December 2010 02:18:37 pm MR ZenWiz wrote: I just began the process of recovering fro

Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-28 Thread Greg Madden
On Tuesday 28 December 2010 02:18:37 pm MR ZenWiz wrote: > I just began the process of recovering from attempting to run a .ppt > slideshow that crashed my machine. > > I attempted to run it once and it crashed Impress. I tried to run it > again and it crashed my machine - hard. I now have a pa

Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-28 Thread Mark
Corrections: 1) I was running LO on the host, not in the VM. 2) It didn't actually crash the host, it crashed GNOME. 3) I wound up having to reboot the machine because VMWS is extremely stubborn about letting go of what it thinks it owns. I still contend that LO should not be crashing the windo

Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-28 Thread Scott Jones
Shouldn't be using a beta version for critical stuff! On Dec 28, 2010, at 6:19 PM, MR ZenWiz wrote: > I just began the process of recovering from attempting to run a .ppt > slideshow that crashed my machine. > > I attempted to run it once and it crashed Impress. I tried to run it > again and it

[libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper

2010-12-28 Thread MR ZenWiz
I just began the process of recovering from attempting to run a .ppt slideshow that crashed my machine. I attempted to run it once and it crashed Impress. I tried to run it again and it crashed my machine - hard. I now have a partially unrecoverable VMWare Workstation VM that I critically need t