(2012/11/24 16:20), Jay Lozier wrote:
Your message this time made it through to the list.
5.7.1 is the error code for spam.
Good morning
Now that the technical problems of sending messages containing the "ex"
word to the list have been mostly clarified,
is there maybe also any idea, why my
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Sunday, 25 November 2012, 6:09
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] messages returned
>
>On 11/24/2012 10:10 PM, Brian Barker wrote:
>> At 21:27 24/11/2012 +0900, Thomas Blasejewicz wrote:
>>> This message COULD be sent in response to my o
On 11/24/2012 10:10 PM, Brian Barker wrote:
At 21:27 24/11/2012 +0900, Thomas Blasejewicz wrote:
This message COULD be sent in response to my own post, but NOT in
response to Mr. Davies' post. Now that the message has been posted,
it does not matter any more, but
somehow I would like to know w
At 21:27 24/11/2012 +0900, Thomas Blasejewicz wrote:
This message COULD be sent in response to my own post, but NOT in
response to Mr. Davies' post. Now that the message has been posted,
it does not matter any more, but
somehow I would like to know why ...
(2012/11/21 17:53), Tom Davies wrote:
On 11/24/2012 07:27 AM, Thomas Blasejewicz wrote:
This message COULD be sent in response to my own post,
but NOT in response to Mr. Davies post.
Now that the message has been posted, it does not matter any more, but
somehow I would like to know why ...
(2012/11/24 21:25), Thomas Blasejewicz wr
s at this end. Sorry chap! Regards
> from
> Tom :)
>
> >
> >
> > From: Thomas Blasejewicz
> >
> >To: users@global.libreoffice.org
> >Sent: Saturday, 24 November 2012, 12:27
> >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] messages returned
>
wicz
>To: users@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Saturday, 24 November 2012, 12:27
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] messages returned
>
>This message COULD be sent in response to my own post,
>but NOT in response to Mr. Davies post.
>Now that the message has been posted, it does not matter an
This message COULD be sent in response to my own post,
but NOT in response to Mr. Davies post.
Now that the message has been posted, it does not matter any more, but
somehow I would like to know why ...
(2012/11/24 21:25), Thomas Blasejewicz wrote:
(Sent for the fourth time today ...
AND it bo
(Sent for the fourth time today ...
AND it bounced immediately!)
(2012/11/21 17:53), Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi
> Have you tried renaming your user profile? Is it possible the problem
is being caused by an Extension?
>
> I'm not sure if it would be better to post a new bug-report and link
to the o
Good evening
This first message of mine and your response went through.
Yet, I tried (again, for the third time) to respond to a message from
Tom Davies.
Every time it bounces back.
When I get home, I try again from there.
Thomas
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.l
On 11/24/2012 01:19 AM, Thomas Blasejewicz wrote:
Good afternoon
I am trying to post a message, or rather repons to another one, but my
messages are rejected.
Although I DID sent a message from this computer / mail address a few
days ago.
(I did not change anything here on my computer ...)
What
Good afternoon
I am trying to post a message, or rather repons to another one, but my
messages are rejected.
Although I DID sent a message from this computer / mail address a few
days ago.
(I did not change anything here on my computer ...)
What is it, that I am making wrong this time?
Below the
12 matches
Mail list logo
