ebmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] why does Windows version take so long to
remove?
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Friday, 10 August, 2012, 14:07
On 08/10/2012 05:53 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-08-08 4:19 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P w
hy does Windows version take so long to
remove?
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Friday, 10 August, 2012, 14:07
On 08/10/2012 05:53 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2012-08-08 4:19 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
> wrote:
>>> I will say though... I consider 1GB to be the *bare minumum* on a
ming-on-linux1131-19-awesome-opensource-games-for-linux/
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Fri, 10/8/12, Andrew Brager wrote:
From: Andrew Brager
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] why does Windows version take so long to
remove?
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Friday, 10 August, 2012, 21:00
Yo
nstaafl
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] why does Windows version take so long to
remove?
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Cc: "Jay Lozier"
Date: Friday, 10 August, 2012, 23:08
On 2012-08-10 2:54 PM, Jay Lozier wrote:
> There is a point of diminishing returns where more memory wi
On 2012-08-10 2:54 PM, Jay Lozier wrote:
There is a point of diminishing returns where more memory will not
noticeably improve performance depending on usage with increasing
memory. But the demands on the computer tend to increase with time as
people use more graphically intensive applications/w
You clearly don't play video games :^)
On 8/10/2012 6:02 AM, Lynne Stevens wrote:
*Might also upgrade to Linux a windows is not one of the better
systems to use for anything .
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org
On 08/10/2012 02:14 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-08-10 8:52 AM, Jay Lozier wrote:
Actually, maximizing the RAM on any computer will improve its
performance and it is relatively cheap and easy to do. It does not
matter which OS or CPU.
My point though is that there is generally a sweet spot, d
On 2012-08-10 8:52 AM, Jay Lozier wrote:
Actually, maximizing the RAM on any computer will improve its
performance and it is relatively cheap and easy to do. It does not
matter which OS or CPU.
My point though is that there is generally a sweet spot, determined by
OS/version and what kind of
On 08/10/2012 05:53 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-08-08 4:19 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
wrote:
I will say though... I consider 1GB to be the *bare minumum* on an XP
box but it will still be sluggish. I couldn't use it with 512MB, it
would drive me to drink.
For XP, I always recommend 2GB, and fo
omega
The
Omega sector
America's Last
Line of
Defense
*You have a SLOW or not much memory VIDEO CARD ! !. . . Since a 500 meg
or more video card is below $25.00 get one and your computer will work
better take the 32 to 124 meg video card out and burn it so no one else
uses it and wo
On 08/10/2012 05:53 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-08-08 4:19 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
wrote:
I will say though... I consider 1GB to be the *bare minumum* on an XP
box but it will still be sluggish. I couldn't use it with 512MB, it
would drive me to drink.
For XP, I always recommend 2GB, and fo
On 2012-08-08 4:19 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
wrote:
I will say though... I consider 1GB to be the *bare minumum* on an XP
box but it will still be sluggish. I couldn't use it with 512MB, it
would drive me to drink.
For XP, I always recommend 2GB, and for 7 (won't touch Vista), minimum
is 4GB.
On 08/08/2012 03:49 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-08-08 11:04 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
wrote:
I am using Control Panel to remove it before I install 3.5.5.
Well it has taken over 1/2 hour to remove it, and still has time to go.
This is on a Sempron 3500+ CPU, 512 MB ram, running XP.
This ver
On 2012-08-08 11:04 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
wrote:
I am using Control Panel to remove it before I install 3.5.5.
Well it has taken over 1/2 hour to remove it, and still has time to go.
This is on a Sempron 3500+ CPU, 512 MB ram, running XP.
This very slow removal is also happing on a much f
I am working on a Windows desktop that has 3.4.x [.5 or .6] on it.
I am using Control Panel to remove it before I install 3.5.5.
Well it has taken over 1/2 hour to remove it, and still has time to go.
This is on a Sempron 3500+ CPU, 512 MB ram, running XP.
This very slow removal is also happi
15 matches
Mail list logo
