Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

2014-02-26 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Sorry no-one has replied yet! I'm not sure if any of these guides help https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Other_Documentation_and_Resources#Corporate_Users In Windows there is some sort of xcu file or registry entry or something that you might be able to use. Mostly it

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

2014-02-06 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) I used to like the Netscape email client. After it went into Firefox and then shoved into Seamonkey it seemed to lose lots of what i felt made it so powerful. Many times after sending an email Netscape allowed me to delete it from the other person's server. I've heard that a lot of people

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

2014-02-05 Thread Kracked_P_P---webmaster
On 02/05/2014 02:38 AM, Marcello Romani wrote: Il 03/02/2014 17:47, Kracked_P_P---webmaster ha scritto: On 02/03/2014 08:48 AM, Marcello Romani wrote: Il 03/02/2014 13:21, IOmazic ha scritto: Hi, is it possible that you share this tools for windows? I will need to install it to around 450

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

2014-02-05 Thread Marcello Romani
For the record, I've been a happy user of soffice even before the 1.0 release (I started being happy right after they dictched that awful desktop-over-desktop Start Office thing ;-) Even before LO existed I pushed OO over MSO in the company where I work (I'm the IT manager). I even introduced

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

2014-02-05 Thread Jonathon
On February 5, 2014 1:53:59 AM PST, Kracked_P_P wrote: both packages has the same roots OOo to LO and OOo to AOO, but we are now different packages and offer different GUI styles and options, plus our base coding has been changed and may not be reflected in AOO's base coding. Given the

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

2014-02-05 Thread e-letter
On 05/02/2014, Marcello Romani mrom...@ottotecnica.com wrote: For the record, I've been a happy user of soffice even before the 1.0 release (I started being happy right after they dictched that awful desktop-over-desktop Start Office thing ;-) I miss that! :) And starmail too... -- To

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

2014-02-05 Thread Marcello Romani
Il 05/02/2014 21:48, e-letter ha scritto: On 05/02/2014, Marcello Romani mrom...@ottotecnica.com wrote: For the record, I've been a happy user of soffice even before the 1.0 release (I started being happy right after they dictched that awful desktop-over-desktop Start Office thing ;-) I miss

RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

2014-02-03 Thread V Stuart Foote
@Ivan, From: IOmazic ioma...@wmo.int Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 6:21 AM is it possible that you share this tools for windows? I will need to install it to around 450 pc, so it will be cool to have some tool to do all modification needed. Since LibreOffice is packaged for installation using

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

2014-02-03 Thread Kracked_P_P---webmaster
On 02/03/2014 08:48 AM, Marcello Romani wrote: Il 03/02/2014 13:21, IOmazic ha scritto: Hi, is it possible that you share this tools for windows? I will need to install it to around 450 pc, so it will be cool to have some tool to do all modification needed. Kind regards, Ivan Omazic

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

2014-02-03 Thread Kracked_P_P---webmaster
YES, F.O.S.S packages share things with other groups, but I really thing business users needs the documentation on LO pages and not OOo pages. These people do not understand about the sharing of information between friendly competition FOSS packages and the lack of info due to the

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

2014-02-03 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) You are not alone in that opinion but i can see it from other angles too. 1. The way i see it is that LO and AOO are produced by 1 large community. There are quite a few people who work in both or move from 1 to the other and sometimes back again. The mainstream press seems to think we

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

2014-02-03 Thread Kracked_P_P---webmaster
YES this is the type of LO page link we should give users instead of sending them off to OOo or any other non-LO site first. I knew we had documentation somewhere. We just need to get the word out there better. Maybe have more indexed material resources list. The

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

2014-02-03 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Copypaste is good wrt my item 3. Regards from Tom :) On 3 February 2014 17:45, Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: YES, F.O.S.S packages share things with other groups, but I really thing business users needs the documentation on LO pages and not OOo pages. These