[libreoffice-users] LO 4.2.1.1 .docx file: partial text and images.

2014-03-05 Thread warp9pnt9
From time to time I receive .docx email attachments from local groups, such as colleges or community organizations, which may display with varying amounts of success. Recently, I received such a .docx as a mail attachment which only displays partial text. My goal is to gather sufficient

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: The Document Foundation's response to Her Majesty's Government...

2014-03-05 Thread Paul
Do you think [OOXML] stands a chance with its incompatible changes between [each version], or [standardisation / xsd:boolean] fiasco? Or the lack of documentation and a heap of undocumented extensions [MSO] uses? There, fixed that for you. On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:31:06 +0700 Urmas

Re: [libreoffice-users] Compress images

2014-03-05 Thread Cley Faye
2014-03-05 6:57 GMT+01:00 Thomas ny...@hb.tp1.jp: (2014/03/05 12:23), Cley Faye wrote: 2014-02-28 2:16 GMT+01:00 Cley Faye cleyf...@gmail.com: If anyone want to give it a try here's the jar. It's highly unlikely to corrupt your source file (the source file is never ever written), but

[libreoffice-users] Re: [OT] LO 4.2.1.1 .docx file: partial text and images.

2014-03-05 Thread warp9pnt9
Off-topic digression follows. On 2014-03-05 05:04, Tom Davies wrote: Imagine a schoolkid getting beaten up every day by a bully How do you convince people of the truth? What happens if all the kids gang up together? In this analogy, who is the bully and who is the kid out of luck? I

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: The Document Foundation's response to Her Majesty's Government...

2014-03-05 Thread Jim Seymour
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:31:06 +0700 Urmas davian...@gmail.com wrote: Tom Davies: Do you think ODF stands a chance with its incompatible changes between 1.0 and 1.1, or formulas fiasco? Or the lack of documentation and a heap of undocumented extensions AOO/LO uses? Do you think .doc[x]

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: The Document Foundation's response to Her Majesty's Government...

2014-03-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Quite. It was only older versions of MS Office that had problems reading formulae. Everyone else was easily able to correctly implement the 800 page specification as set as an ISO standard. The 11,000 page OOXML ISO standard doesn't appear to have been correctly implemented by anyone,

Re: [libreoffice-users] find and replace problem

2014-03-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Why bother to replace all the double-spaces? Many people prefer it so you are pleasing one bunch of people but annoying another whole bunch. Imo it's more important for the document to be internally consistent. I often get handed documents which sometimes use double and sometimes single.

[libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-accessibility] How to return accessible LibreOffice ? (Beginner)

2014-03-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Christophe suggested using tagged Pdf which seems obvious with hindsight (as so many really good answers often do) Regard from Tom :) On 5 March 2014 10:16, Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi :) Can anyone here help this university with advice on how to set-up their system? Would

Re: [libreoffice-users] --convert-to issue

2014-03-05 Thread e-letter
On 04/03/2014, Ed_0 x9...@mail.ru wrote: Hi, I would like to know, why does libreoffice open up after running in a terminal libreoffice --convert-to odt *.doc? It should not do this. Check your installation again. (E.g: http://www.mail-archive.com/users%40global.libreoffice.org/msg12280.html

Re: [libreoffice-users] pls. add a link to your PGP keys (the code signing keys) to the download page/s, and other places

2014-03-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Err, is this soemthing for the websites team? I'm trying to send the message to them but i often don't get through Regards from Tom :) On 4 March 2014 22:11, Thomas Gries m...@tgries.de wrote: pls. add a link to your PGP key/s with which the detached signatures (*.asc) files are made

Re: [libreoffice-users] Compress images

2014-03-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) You generally put the source file straight after a command and then the target file (hopefully avoiding over-writing an existing file!) after that. So it's typically command parameter (tags and such) existing-file resulting-file usually written in instructions as command source

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply-To?

2014-03-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) [sighs deeply] So some people on this mailing-list demand that we all change which email-client we use to the one that they use and then set it to a non-default way. Many of us disagree with that sort of philosophy, especially for a User Support mailing-list. In my opinion we should be

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply-To?

2014-03-05 Thread Jim Seymour
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:46:00 + Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi :) [sighs deeply] So some people on this mailing-list demand that we all change which email-client we use to the one that they use and then set it to a non-default way. [snip] I only recall seeing one suggestion that

Re: [libreoffice-users] find and replace problem

2014-03-05 Thread Kracked_P_P---webmaster
On 03/05/2014 02:31 AM, Brian Barker wrote: At 01:30 05/03/2014 -0500, Doug McGarrett wrote: Running LO version 4..1. Editing a three-page document which was written with double-spacing after a period. Tried with search and replace to fix that--tried twice--and both times it came up with the

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [OT] LO 4.2.1.1 .docx file: partial text and images.

2014-03-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Actually the kid WAS all the end-users. This mailing-list is almost entirely end-users. We are here to help each other and learn new tricks. So are almost all of the devs (also end users) and everyone else in the project. The whole reason for this entire project is that we DO want

[libreoffice-users] Re: --convert-to issue

2014-03-05 Thread Ed_0
On 04/03/14 19:56, null wrote: Hello, I think the reason why LibreOffice is popping up after you run a --convert-to command is that you are not using --headless. The flag --headless hides the LibreOffice GUI, and only performs the operation specified. Also, it doesn't look like wildcards

[libreoffice-users] Password management in libre office

2014-03-05 Thread Rajiv Yadav
Sir, I m doing project on libre office in retrieval or reset of password set as security password for document can be done if it matches with the hint image set along with password // kindly guide which module or file deals with the password management system in libre office /// regards

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: The Document Foundation's response to Her Majesty's Government...

2014-03-05 Thread Virgil Arrington
Jim, I just have to ask. Are you the same Jim Seymour who used to do battle with John Dvorak in the PC magazines? Virgil On 3/5/2014 7:50 AM, Jim Seymour wrote: On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:31:06 +0700 Urmas davian...@gmail.com wrote: Tom Davies: Do you think ODF stands a chance with its

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply-To?

2014-03-05 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/4/2014 3:01 PM, Carl Paulsen carlpaul...@comcast.net wrote: OK, thanks, this helps. I hadn't understood that the only way to ADD the button was to right-click. Sometimes it's helpful to be explicit. Not everyone knows all the details of every software. From my original email: On

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply-To?

2014-03-05 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/4/2014 3:01 PM, Carl Paulsen carlpaul...@comcast.net wrote: So I had the Reply Lists (or Smart Reply?) button on individual email windows all along (whether showing all headers or not). NO. There is a separate 'Reply List' button. There is a 'Smart Reply' button. Two different buttons.

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply-To?

2014-03-05 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/4/2014 7:37 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote: I'm using Thunderbird latest rev (24.3.0) in PCLOS, and customize only shows the usual reply stuff --reply, reply all, reply list. Are you customizing the MAIN Menu Toolbar (at the very top), or the MAIL HEADER Toolbar (that contains

This isn't the droid you're looking for (was: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: The Document Foundation's response to Her Majesty's Government...)

2014-03-05 Thread Jim Seymour
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:42:20 -0500 Virgil Arrington cuyfa...@hotmail.com wrote: Jim, I just have to ask. Are you the same Jim Seymour who used to do battle with John Dvorak in the PC magazines? [snip] Been quite a few years since I got this question. That could be only if I was emailing

[libreoffice-users] Re: --convert-to issue

2014-03-05 Thread Ed_0
On 05/03/14 10:08, e-letter wrote: On 04/03/2014, Ed_0 x9...@mail.ru wrote: Hi, I would like to know, why does libreoffice open up after running in a terminal libreoffice --convert-to odt *.doc? It should not do this. Check your installation again. (E.g:

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply-To?

2014-03-05 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/5/2014 11:02 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: Again, the 'Smart Reply' button is ONLY available in the HEADER toolbar. And more importantly, can only be ADDED TO the EMail Header Toolbar, NOT the main Menu toolbar up top. If you are trying to drag it to the top one, it

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: --convert-to issue

2014-03-05 Thread Steve Edmonds
On 2014-03-06 05:51, Ed_0 wrote: On 05/03/14 10:08, e-letter wrote: On 04/03/2014, Ed_0 x9...@mail.ru wrote: Hi, I would like to know, why does libreoffice open up after running in a terminal libreoffice --convert-to odt *.doc? It should not do this. Check your installation again. (E.g:

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: --convert-to issue

2014-03-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Not sure about most of that but point 2 ls is the same as ls . and ls ./ it's just a bit of cleverness to try to get around weird limitations. There shouldn't be any difference but what should be and what is are sometimes different. From the summary, i agree that it would be nice to

[libreoffice-users] iMac can't open LibreOffice 4.1.5 updater -- wrong file format?

2014-03-05 Thread Mary-Sue
RE: your updater from MacOSX currently-installed Version: 4.1.4.2 Build ID: 0a0440ccc0227ad9829de5f46be37cfb6edcf72 was supposed to download 4.1.5 ... but this version downloaded instead and in a format I can't open. Should I try to run an updater for this? An automatic notice asking me to

Re: [libreoffice-users] find and replace problem

2014-03-05 Thread Brian Barker
At 08:49 05/03/2014 -0500, Tim Lungstrom wrote: On 03/05/2014 02:31 AM, Brian Barker wrote: At 01:30 05/03/2014 -0500, Doug McGarrett wrote: Running LO version 4..1. Editing a three-page document which was written with double-spacing after a period. Tried with search and replace to fix

Re: [libreoffice-users] --convert-to issue

2014-03-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Oooo, i wish someone had posted either of those conversion methods (scripting and command-line using ./ as a trick to say in the current folder seemingly unnecessarily) in the recent Uk Gov proposal to move to ODF. Of the tiny percentage of objections the point about converting existing

[libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: The Document Foundation's response to Her Majesty's Government...

2014-03-05 Thread Urmas
Jim Seymour: proprietary software Irrelevant. having the propensity to re-write existing documents into formats incompatible with older versions [1]; Impossible. gratuitously wildly divergent user interfaces Document formats cannot have UI. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to:

[libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-accessibility] How to return accessible LibreOffice ? (Beginner)

2014-03-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Can anyone here help this university with advice on how to set-up their system? Would screen readers be better than braille? There are a lot of programs that can read aloud the words and things that appear on the screen. Braille devices are probably a lot rarer. Regards from Tom :) On

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.2.1.1 .docx file: partial text and images.

2014-03-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Please file a bug-report with MS Office for failing to implement their own format as per their ISO specifications. The file(s) that you have trouble opening are likely to also be difficult or even impossible to open in many versions of MS Office. You really need to be using the same

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: --convert-to issue

2014-03-05 Thread gibi
On 05/03/2014 20:16, Steve Edmonds wrote: On 2014-03-06 05:51, Ed_0 wrote: On 05/03/14 10:08, e-letter wrote: On 04/03/2014, Ed_0 x9...@mail.ru wrote: Hi, I would like to know, why does libreoffice open up after running in a terminal libreoffice --convert-to odt *.doc? It should not do

[libreoffice-users] Re: This isn't the droid you're looking for

2014-03-05 Thread Virgil Arrington
Thanks for the clarification. I wasn't aware that *the* Jim Seymour had passed. (Shows how long it's been since I looked at a PC magazine.) But, you write so knowledgeably about computers that I naturally assumed that you were he. Virgil On 3/5/2014 11:26 AM, Jim Seymour wrote: On Wed, 5

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: --convert-to issue

2014-03-05 Thread e-letter
On 05/03/2014, Ed_0 x9...@mail.ru wrote: 1) Hmm, I didn't understand those links, the errors displayed are these: javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! Warning: failed to read path from javaldx You have another problem; activation of hyperlinks doesn't require java... 2)

[libreoffice-users] LO GB help section

2014-03-05 Thread Daniel
Why is it that the Help section of the American version of LO works perfectly well and the GB does not? When I install the help section it puts me online instead of residing in the program as the US version does! Daniel -- -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO GB help section

2014-03-05 Thread Graham Luffrum
Daniel You need to go to Options - Language settings - Languages and make sure that both User interface and Locale setting are set to English(UK). You should then get the inbuilt help. Graham On 6 March 2014 05:39, Daniel dan...@onvol.net wrote: Why is it that the Help section of the