On 11/23/2012 01:18 AM, yinzh...@wistronits.com wrote:
Hi:
I am using jodconverter to call libreoffice, to convert xlsx files to PDF
file, if the xlsx file is empty documents, will the conversion failed. If the
xlsx file contains the content, will be successful conversion.
How can I conver
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Brian Barker wrote:
At 08:23 22/11/2012 -0500, Virgil Aonly wrote:
The fact that the original questioner on this thread had to ask how to
disable so many autocorrect features, I think, proves my point.
No - it just shows that he now knows about automatic correction *and*
Hi:
I am using jodconverter to call libreoffice, to convert
xlsx files to PDF file, if the xlsx file is empty documents, will the
conversion failed. If the xlsx file contains the content, will be successful
conversion.
How can I convert empty excel document? Thanks you very
much.
--
For un
At 08:23 22/11/2012 -0500, Virgil Aonly wrote:
The fact that the original questioner on this thread had to ask how
to disable so many autocorrect features, I think, proves my point.
No - it just shows that he now knows about automatic correction *and*
how to control it.
A user simply trying
Hi:
I am using jodconverter to call libreoffice, to convert xlsx files to PDF
file, if the xlsx file is empty documents, will the conversion failed. If the
xlsx file contains the content, will be successful conversion.
How can I convert empty excel document? Thanks you very much.
Best Re
I never really thought about creating a spell checker for LO, but when I
looked into the .oxt file I saw how easy it could be, if you did not use
all of the "control codes" that I could not find reference to. Once I
figured out some of the internals, it became "relatively easy" to create
a b
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 23:09:44 +0100, Tom Davies
wrote:
Hi :)
Nicely done :) Congrats :D Also thanks for giving the list the answer
that worked best for you so that people in the future might benefit from
finding the option fairly easily
I would rather call it a workaround than a soluti
Hi :)
Nicely done :) Congrats :D Also thanks for giving the list the answer that
worked best for you so that people in the future might benefit from finding the
option fairly easily
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Bjørn K Nilssen
>To: users@global.libreof
Hi :)
+1
I was kinda agreeing with my last post too. Just taking the opportunity to
"raise the profile" of the templates site for anyone that does have a template
or such that they don't mind sharing. It doesn't matter if it's really bad
because it might just be an inspiration for someone else
Yes I know of the Template site.
BUT, there are a lot of people out there that has some good ideas on how
to do things that seem never to be a part of an "official" template list.
The idea of making a master document that automatically combines
sub-documents to make sure the starting page o
2012/11/21 Jay Lozier
> On 11/21/2012 09:04 AM, Pertti Rönnberg wrote:
>
>> On 21.11.2012 12:11, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/11/2012 at 03:13, rost52 wrote:
>>>
>>> Both aspects together is a chance for LibO and AOO. I am looking
forward to
the announcement that both teams t
I am on the road for the next few days, but I will figure out how to file a bug
report when I get back.
"Tom [via Document Foundation Mail Archive]"
wrote:
>
>
>Hi :)
>Have you been able to post a bug-report about this already? Sounds
>like people might have narrowed it down quite a bit (to
Hi :)
Some people do work in both projects. Even if that is becoming increasingly
difficult for devs to do there are a lot of other teams and a lot of other work
which can be shared with only minor modifications.
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Mirosław Zal
Hi :)
There is a Templates site with almost exactly the same name as the Extensions
site. Whichever you are on you might notice the tabs at the top to let you
switch from Extensions to Templates or vice-versa.
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: webmaster-Kracked
Hi :)
Have you been able to post a bug-report about this already? Sounds like people
might have narrowed it down quite a bit (to specific LO version and specific
OS?) Also tried the standard rename User Profile and a couple other things?
So, time for a bug-report?
http://wiki.documentfounda
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:38:08 +0100, Tom Davies
wrote:
Hi :)
Hmmm, if that happened you could just reinstall the older version over
the newer one again. Ahhh, the advantages of Freee Software being free!
:) This approach ensures whichever version you reinstall picks-up all
your setting
Hi :)
I'm not sure which chapter might be best but documentation here
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications
might help. Perhaps Chapter 14 of the Getting Started or the "Styles" Chapters
of the Writer's Guide?
Regards from
Tom :)
>___
Hi :)
Hmmm, if that happened you could just reinstall the older version over the
newer one again. Ahhh, the advantages of Freee Software being free! :) This
approach ensures whichever version you reinstall picks-up all your settings
without forcing you "back to factory defaults".
Another ap
I'm sorry, I just now saw what you meant in your question. I call that
"legal style" numbering.
That's possible, too.
In the Tools/Outline Numbering, click on the "Show Sublevels" to the number
of levels you want to include in your numbering scheme. The default is "1",
so if you want to show,
Sure, it's all about setting the hierarchy of your outline in the
Tools/Outline Numbering dialog. There are 10 levels of outline. Just set the
top level to your section numbering, select the numbering format you want
and, if you want to associate it with a Paragraph Style (which I do), do
that
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:12:16 +0100, thomasjk
wrote:
Use Google search
https://www.google.com/search?q=win+8+error+2502+and+2503&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
It obviously is a problem with Windows Installer.
I have tried installing other msi package
On 19/11/2012, VA wrote:
> In response to Tanstaafl and Regina,
>
>>
>> What I have done is create a bunch of paragraph styles called
>> "Outline-1," "Outline-2," "Outline-3," etc. In terms of Style-controlled
>> formatting, each of these styles is identical -- single spaced with 12
>> point verti
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:12:15 +0100, Tom Davies
wrote:
Hi :)Ok, it might be best to uninstall the older version and then reboot
before trying to install LO again. Normally you shouldn't need to but
something has obviously gone a bit wonky this time.
Well, the older version is still worki
I'm sure I could never think of all the consequences. I'll be the first to
admit that what I prefer others will not.
However, in my experience in a law office using primarily MS-Word, I have
seen many lawyers try to create numbered list using (a), (b), and (c). When
I received their document,
Hi :)
Ok, it might be best to uninstall the older version and then reboot before
trying to install LO again. Normally you shouldn't need to but something has
obviously gone a bit wonky this time.
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Bjørn K Nilssen
>To: users
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 02:01:02 +0100, Tom Davies
wrote:
Hi :)
Open your old version and go to
Tools - Options - Memory
and untick "Quickstarter"
Regards from
Tom :)
It has been unticked all the time.
Looks like this is a msi problem, rather than LO.
From:
Thanks to all, I am listening but also racing a deadline. Brian Barker
has hit the nail on the head. More later
Barry
On 11/22/2012 07:32 AM, Dan Lewis wrote:
On 11/21/2012 06:07 AM, Barry Say wrote:
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? h
27 matches
Mail list logo
