TomD wrote
Presumably it can be done straight from a command-line without even
needing a script as such.
This is an ideal task for a script. Invoking LO to determine ODF version
info is inefficient, especially for multiple files. Here is a basic bash
script to do the task under GNU/Linux:
On 14/03/2014, Hamida Begum hamida_beg...@hotmail.com wrote:
is the program compatible with microsoft office?
Please go to m$ and ask if m$office is compatible with the ODF standard of LO
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
Hello,
I just downloaded the Linux-deb-Version-32-Bit of LO. It installed fine, however
I have a problem with frames. If I want to print a frame without a border,
LO ignores the definition (i.e. - thickness and colour of the line). Even
if I define no border at all plus pinting in white colour
nabbler wrote
Please go to m$ and ask if m$office is compatible with the ODF standard of
LO
THAT is exactly the problem! There should never be an ODF standard of LO.
If OASIS (the organization that defines the ODF standard) is not able to
keep pace and improve on the document's definition to
On 15/03/14 11:25, Pedro wrote:
If OASIS (the organization that defines the ODF standard) is not able to
keep pace and improve on the document's definition to make it a valid open
document standard, then the de facto standard will ALWAYS be the MS file
formats...
ODF has a clear path
Am 15.03.2014 10:25, schrieb Heinrich Stoellinger:
I have a problem with frames. If I want to print a frame without a border,
LO ignores the definition (i.e. - thickness and colour of the line). Even
if I define no border at all plus pinting in white colour around the
frame
this gets
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 03:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
nabbler wrote
Please go to m$ and ask if m$office is compatible with the ODF standard of
LO
THAT is exactly the problem! There should never be an ODF standard of LO.
If OASIS (the organization that defines the ODF
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 03:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
nabbler wrote
Please go to m$ and ask if m$office is compatible with the ODF
standard of LO
THAT is exactly the problem! There should never be an ODF standard
of LO.
[snip]
I read that as compatible with the ODF
Hi Jim, all
Jim Seymour wrote
I read that as compatible with the ODF standard, as implemented in
LO. I.e.: LO uses the ODF standard. Does MS Office?
Did I read that wrong? Or does LO not properly implement the ODF
standard?
As Italo mentioned LO is backwards compatible with all ODF
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 08:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jim, all
Jim Seymour wrote
I read that as compatible with the ODF standard, as implemented
in LO. I.e.: LO uses the ODF standard. Does MS Office?
Did I read that wrong? Or does LO not properly implement
On 3/14/2014 11:20 AM, Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:
I found some excellent advice from one of the moderators there.
Someone with a very familiar name!
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=39t=366405sid=f6c8f025bc5fff3f5f634d2a9e4b076f
[tips hat to tanstaafi].
Just to be clear,
Hi Jim,
On 3/15/2014 4:58 PM, Jim Seymour wrote:
...
As Italo mentioned LO is backwards compatible with all ODF
specifications. But since LO is pushing the ODF file format, the
current LO implementation is more advanced than the current
approved OASIS standard (e.g. LO supports font embedding)
Jim Seymour wrote
No offense intended, but that's weasel-word way of saying LO is
non-standard.
I can't figure out how calling someone a weasel can be *not* offensive...
I'm not affiliated to TDF/LO so this is just my opinion and I don't have any
advantage in convincing anyone to use LO/ODF and
Dear all,
a spreadsheet has thousands of lines and hundreds of columns. Most users (like
me) don’t need that many cells. Is there any way to limit the amount of lines
and rows in a specific file?
Thanks a lot!
Lorenzo
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Hi :)
E-letter's post was somewhat confusing. ODF 1.2 is used by many
programs and suites and is implemented almost identically in all of
them.
You can even post bug-reports in the various programs and suites if
you do find any difference between implementation and written
specification. Errr,
Hi :)
Ok, so the helpful guide isn't yours but you are still active over
there. So you still deserve the kudos.
Regards from
Tom :)
On 15 March 2014 16:05, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/14/2014 11:20 AM, Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:
I found some excellent advice from
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:12:51 +0100
Werner werner...@gmx.ch wrote:
Hi Jim,
[snip]
My understanding as a normal/basic user of LO is that it supports
the different ODF standards which exist, some of them approved by
OASIS and others not yet approved.
E.g. in writer you can select the ODF
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Jim Seymour wrote
No offense intended, but that's weasel-word way of saying LO is
non-standard.
I can't figure out how calling someone a weasel can be *not*
offensive...
[snip]
My apologies. Bad choice of terms on
On 15/03/14 16:58, Jim Seymour wrote:
To be clear: I have no problem with LO implementing non-standard
behaviour, but that behaviour *must* be optional, with the switches
that enable it clearly noted as such.
You can select the default ODF document format from the Options menu.
You can choose
Le 15/03/2014 17:25, Lore a écrit :
Dear all, a spreadsheet has thousands of lines and hundreds of
columns. Most users (like me) don’t need that many cells. Is there
any way to limit the amount of lines and rows in a specific file?
what for?
AFAIK the software uses only memory necessary for
yes, I so agree.
And for that reason, I ceased using PPs for videos and found an
absolutely delightful gem of a program -
VideoPad Video Editor - through Gizmo's [
http://www.techsupportalert.com/ ]
From: Dave Liesse dslie...@liessefamily.net
Date: Fri, Mar 14, 2014
In data sabato 15 marzo 2014 13:34:01, pete nikolic ha scritto:
Has Urmas changed his username ? makes one wonder
I think so. In fact, its address is inpost(or)@gmail.com
The debunker is back.
--
Valter
Open Source is better!
LibreOffice: www.libreoffice.org
KDE: www.kde.org
Thanks for your reply Jean-Francois.
It is actually an usability improvement I’m after. If you are using a mouse
with an inertial scrolling (such as an Apple mouse or trackpad) and you want to
get to the end of your sheet, you can do a strong stroke with your finger.
Problem is, you don’t get
Le 15/03/2014 20:29, Lore a écrit :
It is actually an usability improvement I’m after. If you are using a
mouse with an inertial scrolling (such as an Apple mouse or trackpad)
and you want to get to the end of your sheet, you can do a strong
stroke with your finger. Problem is, you don’t get
Yes, I guess it would be easier… if no limit can be set…
Il giorno 15/mar/2014, alle ore 20:38, Jean-Francois Nifenecker
jean-francois.nifenec...@laposte.net ha scritto:
Le 15/03/2014 20:29, Lore a écrit :
It is actually an usability improvement I’m after. If you are using a
mouse with an
At 17:25 15/03/2014 +0100, Lorenzo Noname wrote:
a spreadsheet has thousands of lines and
hundreds of columns. Most users (like me) don't
need that many cells. Is there any way to limit
the amount of lines and rows in a specific file?
As has been suggested, there is usually no
overhead in
Hello,
Can anyone tell me how I can get the following date pattern in my
(writer) document?
15th day of March, 2014
1st day of April, 2014
2nd day of June 2014
etc.
Thank you
- Andrew
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
Jim Seymour wrote
Pedro wrote:
So it's not a case that LO is not implementing the existing ODF
standards but that it is already improving on them (in an open
manner, unlike MS XML). So OASIS has to catch up :)
OASIS establishes the standards, no? If such is the case: What
you've written,
A wrote
Can anyone tell me how I can get the following date pattern in my (writer)
document?
15th day of March, 2014
As this https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7t=65620
Apache OO forum thread indicates, ordinal suffixes are not supported in date
fields. A format code of:
29 matches
Mail list logo
