Hi Jim, all
Jim Seymour wrote > I read that as "compatible with the ODF standard, as implemented in > LO." I.e.: LO uses the ODF standard. Does MS Office? > > Did I read that wrong? Or does LO not properly implement the ODF > standard? As Italo mentioned LO is backwards compatible with all ODF specifications. But since LO is pushing the ODF file format, the current LO implementation is more advanced than the current approved OASIS standard (e.g. LO supports font embedding) So it's not a case that LO is not implementing the existing ODF standards but that it is already improving on them (in an open manner, unlike MS XML). So OASIS has to catch up :) Hope this makes it clear ;) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-LO-compatibility-tp4101492p4101566.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
