MR. ZW, let's play nice now, OK? :)
So regarding the thread of substance, what is DIFFERENT about the Ubuntu vs.
Deb, vs official LO application? I didn't think that the Canonical folks
MODIFY anything, correct?
I think that keeping Ubuntu version separate from all others seems to be
On 18/02/11 19:14, emarkay wrote:
MR. ZW, let's play nice now, OK? :)
So regarding the thread of substance, what is DIFFERENT about the Ubuntu vs.
Deb, vs official LO application?
The major major difference is that the ppa version does NOT enable the
user to use any address book source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-02-09 10:13 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 09/02/11 15:44, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions a écrit :
Yes, it will be much easier to keep up-to-date when LibreOffice is in
its repository and then find that there is an update shown
Using the PPA also ensures that any debugging is being done on the
appropriate repo. As I see it .debs are for developers - Toochain to
Alpha...
See here for more info on LO/Ubuntu PPA and bugs: