[libreoffice-users] Re: Ubuntu - don't install LibreOffice manually from the .deb files

2011-02-18 Thread emarkay
MR. ZW, let's play nice now, OK? :) So regarding the thread of substance, what is DIFFERENT about the Ubuntu vs. Deb, vs official LO application? I didn't think that the Canonical folks MODIFY anything, correct? I think that keeping Ubuntu version separate from all others seems to be

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Ubuntu - don't install LibreOffice manually from the .deb files

2011-02-18 Thread Gordon Burgess-Parker
On 18/02/11 19:14, emarkay wrote: MR. ZW, let's play nice now, OK? :) So regarding the thread of substance, what is DIFFERENT about the Ubuntu vs. Deb, vs official LO application? The major major difference is that the ppa version does NOT enable the user to use any address book source

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Ubuntu - don't install LibreOffice manually from the .deb files

2011-02-09 Thread Fabian Rodriguez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11-02-09 10:13 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: Le 09/02/11 15:44, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions a écrit : Yes, it will be much easier to keep up-to-date when LibreOffice is in its repository and then find that there is an update shown

[libreoffice-users] Re: Ubuntu - don't install LibreOffice manually from the .deb files

2011-02-09 Thread emarkay
Using the PPA also ensures that any debugging is being done on the appropriate repo. As I see it .debs are for developers - Toochain to Alpha... See here for more info on LO/Ubuntu PPA and bugs: