MR. ZW, let's play nice now, OK? :) So regarding the thread of substance, what is DIFFERENT about the Ubuntu vs. Deb, vs "official" LO application? I didn't think that the Canonical folks MODIFY anything, correct?
I think that "keeping Ubuntu version separate from all others" seems to be strangely counterproductive; being that the latest Ubuntu is both featuring and promoting LO... Not that separate is bad, but having independent bug resources and not always keeping "in sync" seems so carbon-paper and manual typewriter... ;) ----- Ubuntu 10.04 LTS & Windows XP-SP3 - (1) 2.8 G/2G RAM/ATI HD2600,512VRAM/SIS AC97 OB Audio (2) 2.9 G/3G RAM/NVIDIA 9500GT,1024VRAM/SB AudigySE Audio (3) 2.3 G/2G RAM/NVIDIA FX1500M,256VRAM/Sigmatel HD Aud -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Ubuntu-don-t-install-LibreOffice-manually-from-the-deb-files-tp2458845p2528986.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
