P
> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings on this list have changed
> To: users@global.libreoffice.org
> Date: Tuesday, 14 August, 2012, 15:24
>
> On 08/14/2012 08:00 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> On 2012-08-13 4:01 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
>>> Yesterday, your c
I strongly support the change. It is the fail-safe option. Users of this
list know how to use their email to send back to the list
regards
Mike
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsub
Tanstaafl wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:24 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
With this mix of system being used for various tasks, I would have a
mess if I tried to read emails on more than one system, even if I
could get a sync system to work properly between the various Windows
and Ubuntu sy
achines but often install a
crippled/trial version of MSO. This may change if MS continues to move
into device manufacturing, hardware vendors may promote/install other
products to avoid supporting MS.
--- On Tue, 14/8/12, Steve Edmonds wrote:
From: Steve Edmonds
Subject: Re: [libreoff
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:24 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
With this mix of system being used for various tasks, I would have a
mess if I tried to read emails on more than one system, even if I
could get a sync system to work properly between the various Windows
and Ubuntu systems.
This is w
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Tue, 14/8/12, Steve Edmonds wrote:
From: Steve Edmonds
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings on this list have changed
To: "anne-ology"
Cc: "Mark LaPierre" , users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Tuesday, 14 August, 2012, 1:03
I primar
have moved to.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Tue, 14/8/12, Florian Effenberger wrote:
From: Florian Effenberger
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings on this list have changed
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Tuesday, 14 August, 2012, 1:12
Hello everyone,
I just wanted to
smart phones sometimes use something
else.
What people usually mean is they have never used it as a desktop OS.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Tue, 14/8/12, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings on this list have chang
, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings on this list have changed
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Tuesday, 14 August, 2012, 15:24
On 08/14/2012 08:00 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2012-08-13 4:01 PM, Girvin R. Herr wr
ers 2 including reply. Does MS ever
comply with RFCs? Does it even try to or claim it tries to?
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Tue, 14/8/12, Steven Shelton wrote:
From: Steven Shelton
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings on this list have changed
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
it a total pita for me as i have hundreds of emails to get
through and 2 clicks instead of 1 is a pita that i wouldn't normally notice so
much.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Thu, 16/8/12, anne-ology wrote:
From: anne-ology
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settin
exactly;
and well expressed.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Bjørn K Nilssen wrote:
På Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:31:07 +0200, skrev Florian Effenberger <
> flo...@documentfoundation.org**>:
>
>
> Hello,
>>
>> this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have changed
På Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:31:07 +0200, skrev Florian Effenberger
:
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have changed
(so-called "Reply to mangling" has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In other
words, with any e-mail
On 14-08-12 19:03, anne-ology wrote:
wow, you should be a great attorney;
you're very expressive.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Steven Shelton wrote:
On 8/13/2012 7:36 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Not trying to be rude. All of you should be smart enough to run an email
wow, you should be a great attorney;
you're very expressive.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Steven Shelton wrote:
>
> On 8/13/2012 7:36 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> > Not trying to be rude. All of you should be smart enough to run an email
> tool. After all you're all
> Linux
exactly; and well said.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Steven Shelton wrote:
> On 8/14/2012 5:50 AM, Bjørn K Nilssen wrote:
> > My feedback is that I don't like the change at all.
>
> I agree. The purpose of a list like this is to share information.
> Typically, when a person on a lis
On 08/14/2012 10:54 AM, Steven Shelton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/13/2012 7:36 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Not trying to be rude. All of you should be smart enough to run an email tool.
After all you're all
Linux users who administer at least one Linux installati
So you're saying because everyone else you interact with does it wrong,
it should also be done wrong here. Allow me to remind you that two (or
50) wrongs don't make a right.
Why is it wrong? Refer to Brian Barker's post wherein he references an
RFC. I'd repost what he wrote but I've already
3 desktops, 2 laptops, 1 tablet - currently out of storage cabinets and
setup to run whenever I need it to. More in storage.
1 Blu-ray Player with Internet content apps.
3 network printers [b&w duplexing, color laser, USB
printer/copier/scanner/fax], 1 USB printer [printer/scanner/copier],
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/13/2012 7:36 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Not trying to be rude. All of you should be smart enough to run an email
> tool. After all you're all
Linux users who administer at least one Linux installation.
And, crap, this stupid change . . . this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/14/2012 5:50 AM, Bjørn K Nilssen wrote:
> My feedback is that I don't like the change at all.
I agree. The purpose of a list like this is to share information.
Typically, when a person on a list such as this one hits "REPLY", that
person is par
and you have how many computers ???
Just wondering, when do you have time for other things? - as eating,
sleeping, or conversing with others - as friends & family;
and when do you tend to various jobs; both work & hobbies ???
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:24 AM, webmaster-K
On 08/14/2012 08:00 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-08-13 4:01 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
Yesterday, your changes broke my email filter which puts libreoffice
user group messages in a specific folder. But then I changed the filter
from looking at "Reply-To:" to "To:" and thought that would suffice.
yes, I agree.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-08-13 4:01 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
>
>> I hope this gets to the right place. I used "Reply All" in
>> Thunderbird. The header looks correct, but people are going to get
>> duplicate messages.
>>
>
> Why not 'Rep
exactly.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Bjørn K Nilssen wrote:
My feedback is that I don't like the change at all.
> Most of the mailing lists I subscribe to nowadays (~50 lists) are on Yahoo
> or Google, and none of them behaves like this, with no Reply-To field. They
> all have the
On 2012-08-13 4:01 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
Yesterday, your changes broke my email filter which puts libreoffice
user group messages in a specific folder. But then I changed the filter
from looking at "Reply-To:" to "To:" and thought that would suffice.
Now, this morning I got 7 libreoffice mes
On 2012-08-13 4:01 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
I hope this gets to the right place. I used "Reply All" in
Thunderbird. The header looks correct, but people are going to get
duplicate messages.
Why not 'Reply to List' (I use the keyboard shortcut, CTRL-SHIFT-L)?
Thunderbird added this a long t
På Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:12:33 +0200, skrev Florian Effenberger
:
Hello everyone,
I just wanted to thank everyone for your feedback, and assure you that I
read every bit, even if I don't manage to reply to every message in
detail.
My offer stands valid, let's wait for some more feedback a
The questions on your poll are rather "leading". The items you have
selected as questions are really not the issue at all.
This list is still a list, what else could it be? You're using it right
now as you're complaining about it. So clearly, it's not private
communication at all. You simp
I would bet that you have used a Linux based machine. and you just
never knew it. Seems like Linux is everywhere. Seems that I own a DVR, a
fancy Panasonic DVD player, and a phone that all seem to be based on
Linux. It is everywhere, we just don't know it! :-)
On 08/13/2012 07:55 PM, ann
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
I think I discovered the secret. In this group now, it appears when
someone "Reply-All"s to a posting, The "To:" comes from the "From:"
posting header entry, which is the poster's address and not
practical to filter on in this case. However, the gro
It is fine the way it is as of now, in fact I quite like the change as
it means I no longer get broken threads in my inbox which leads to it
being cluttered. so my vote lies with the change, I use to use a Linux
machine but found it beyond my comprehension so migrated back to
windows. Florian you m
webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
On 08/13/2012 07:36 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 08/12/2012 12:31 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have changed
(so-called "Reply to mangling" has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to t
Another method is to have multiple e-addresses -
in this way, the e-address will remain valid even if the ISP
changes ;-)
each e-address is known to certain ones; I log-in to the
e-address I wish to peruse then go on to the next one, etc.
[and I'll filter
On 08/13/2012 07:36 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 08/12/2012 12:31 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have changed
(so-called "Reply to mangling" has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In othe
Steve, you're so right; thank you for some statistics.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Steve Edmonds
wrote:
I primarily use SUSE but also osx and win. I support Anne.
> If (as an example only) 80% of LO potential is win based and this is the
> target for growth then to be non-exclusive a
Hello everyone,
I just wanted to thank everyone for your feedback, and assure you that I
read every bit, even if I don't manage to reply to every message in detail.
My offer stands valid, let's wait for some more feedback and some more
days, and then make a final decision.
Florian
--
Flori
I primarily use SUSE but also osx and win. I support Anne.
If (as an example only) 80% of LO potential is win based and this is the
target for growth then to be non-exclusive and encourage advancement in
the win platform the support list should cater for the most common win.
mail applications.
On 8/13/2012 7:25 PM, Jay Lozier wrote:
I see the Reply List next to Reply in Thunderbird.
--
Jay Lozier
jsloz...@gmail.com
That button is apparently a function of this list. It isn't
on any other list that I subscribe to.
Many thanks to the list managers who took care of this problem.
you're mis-informed; I, for one, have never used a Linus-based
machine; and I bet I'm not the only one.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 08/12/2012 12:31 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list h
On 08/12/2012 12:31 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have changed
(so-called "Reply to mangling" has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In other
words, with any e-mail client, replies to e-
On 08/13/2012 06:53 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
On 08/13/2012 03:37 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
I'm subscribed to quite a few lists by now, and some of them has had
this ”new” behaviour for quite some time. I was kind of hoping THEY
would change…
Kind regards
Johnny Rosenberg
ジョニー・ローゼンバー
On 08/13/2012 03:37 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
I'm subscribed to quite a few lists by now, and some of them has had
this ”new” behaviour for quite some time. I was kind of hoping THEY
would change…
Kind regards
Johnny Rosenberg
ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ
It will just take some time to get use to NOT usi
I prefer the list, or even better a forum. I won't be bothered editing
the to/cc fields on a reply so it will be reply-all and every poster I
reply to will get a private copy. I suspect in time this will become the
norm.
Steve
On 2012-08-14 08:01, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
Greetings,
I hope this
Greetings,
I hope this gets to the right place. I used "Reply All" in
Thunderbird. The header looks correct, but people are going to get
duplicate messages.
Here is another side-effect of this change:
Florian,
Right! Yesterday, your changes broke my email filter which puts
libreoffice user
It has changed to become "@myopera.com" now. and as it is still in beta
phase you only have 1gb of space which is still heaps for emails! They
plan to increase it in the near future. (best thing with this is there
is no adverts to annoy me or nor is there googles stupid tracking
policy!)
On Mon, 1
2012/8/13 Anthony Easthope :
> Opera Webmail. I move around to much on computers to use a dedicated
> mail client. http://mail.opera.com
I actually have an Opera Mail address, but I didn't use it for years
now; maybe it's erased by now. So it could be a good idea to use Opera
Mail for email lists,
Opera Webmail. I move around to much on computers to use a dedicated
mail client. http://mail.opera.com
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, at 09:39 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
> 2012/8/13 Anthony Easthope :
> > To me it seems fairly straightforward. I use Opera mail and it is great
> > for mailing lists as it g
2012/8/13 Anthony Easthope :
> To me it seems fairly straightforward. I use Opera mail and it is great
> for mailing lists as it groups all replies to one thread in a
> conversation view. it also has a *Reply to list and a *Reply all
> functionality. It only seems logical to me to hit "reply to lis
Exactly - and this is why I totally am not in favour of replying to the
person rather than the list
Our British Car list used to reply to the list and if someone asked a
question everyone saw the answers and ensuing dialogue. Someone
complained about reply to list and the reply to was changed
I'm subscribed to quite a few lists by now, and some of them has had
this ”new” behaviour for quite some time. I was kind of hoping THEY
would change…
Kind regards
Johnny Rosenberg
ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.li
To me it seems fairly straightforward. I use Opera mail and it is great
for mailing lists as it groups all replies to one thread in a
conversation view. it also has a *Reply to list and a *Reply all
functionality. It only seems logical to me to hit "reply to list" as
that is what it is. anyway as t
exactly.
Let's take a poll - (1) to return this list to being an actual list
or
(2) to change this from a list to private
communications between only select ones, depriving the group of learning
the ins & outs of L
I just posted a reply to a thread to the last poster instead of the
thread by mistake. I am so use to pressing "Reply" and the next button
being "Reply All", that I now have to remember to skip the "Reply"
button and remember that the "Reply All" button has been replaced with
"Reply List".
exactly, therefore to change the default, you're changing this list
to where folks will now be corresponding privately rather than allowing the
list to hear what's new and learn from others.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Felmon Davis wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
I did not know that you could "make" the email client state "Reply List"
instead of the text on the "Reply All" button. I run Thunderbird 14.0.
I have to get use to using the "Reply List" instead of "Reply" to post a
message to the thread.
I did not know that you could "make" the email client state "Reply List"
instead of the text on the "Reply All" button. I run Thunderbird 14.0.
I have to get use to using the "Reply List" instead of "Reply" to post a
message to the thread. It could be confusing to people, but does make
it
I quite like this idea of change as it now seems that less mistakes
should be made!
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, at 01:33 AM, Brian Barker wrote:
> At 18:31 12/08/2012 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> >this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have
> >changed (so-called "Reply to mang
At 18:31 12/08/2012 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have
changed (so-called "Reply to mangling" has been disabled).
Well done!
This new way fails safe. A message intended to be public may get
sent privately by mistake - a minor inc
Just testing;
and find this may be the silliest way of setting a list I've seen.
If someone cannot take the minute time to check the 'to' 'cc' 'bcc'
then the 'subject' line, then are they smart enough to operate a machine
;-)
or to handle any secure documents ;-)
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have changed
(so-called "Reply to mangling" has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In other
words, with any e-mail client, replies to e-mails on the list were
automatically sent direct
61 matches
Mail list logo
