showed something like blank;blank;100 .
Best regards,
David Gast
From: Kracked_P_P---webmaster [webmas...@krackedpress.com]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 15:05
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request - Categories
blank;blank;100 .
Best regards,
David Gast
From: Kracked_P_P---webmaster [webmas...@krackedpress.com]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 15:05
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request - Categories for special
At 21:48 23/11/2013 +, David Gast wrote:
On a recent test, I noticed that the HTML blank; entities did not
get changed when inserting, ...
Could that be because blank; is not an HTML entity?!
That is, the Writer document showed something like blank;blank;100 .
An HTML principle is
At 01:37 22/11/2013 -0500, Doug McGarrett wrote:
When I was in grade school, over 60 years ago, lb. meant pound(s).
That's only for pounds Avoirdupois (and it's
lb, not lb.), of course. Pounds Sterling is £.
Brian Barker
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
On 11/21/2013 01:59 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
David Gast wrote:
I have two ideas.
Interestingly, Windows Vista's Character Map utility (and probably
also Windows 7's?) has similar ideas...
1. Highlight the categories, so it is easy to tell where the category
starts and ends.
Vista's
Doug wrote:
On 11/21/2013 02:00 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Then there are the younger users that know # only as hash-tag and
not pound-sign. Yes many of the standard characters have different
names depending on the languages used.
In the UK, # is more commonly
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
On 11/21/2013 01:59 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
David Gast wrote:
I have two ideas.
Interestingly, Windows Vista's Character Map utility (and probably
also Windows 7's?) has similar ideas...
1. Highlight the categories, so it is easy to tell where the category
Mark Bourne wrote:
I always think of # as being a sharp sign.
The musical sharp symbol is slightly different: ♯
Yeah, it is a bit flat to be a sharp sign. ;-)
I've always known it as a number sign.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
Ruth Ann wrote:
OT maybe, but does anyone know the name for @ ?
Something I have been trying to discover for years :-)
Ruth Ann,
Cincinnati, OH USA
It depends who you ask, and in what language ;o) Unicode calls it
commercial at. The article about it on Wikipedia is titled At sign,
and
The recorded voicemail messages (at least here in the U.S.), always instruct
us to press the pound key.
Virgil
-Original Message-
From: James Knott
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 1:23 PM
To: LibreOffice
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request - Categories for special
: Friday, November 22, 2013 1:23 PM
To: LibreOffice
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request - Categories for
special characters
Mark Bourne wrote:
I always think of # as being a sharp sign.
The musical sharp symbol is slightly different: ♯
Yeah, it is a bit flat to be a sharp sign
On 11/22/2013 01:20 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
On 11/21/2013 01:59 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
David Gast wrote:
I have two ideas.
Interestingly, Windows Vista's Character Map utility (and probably
also Windows 7's?) has similar ideas...
1. Highlight the categories,
On 11/21/2013 11:37 PM, Doug wrote:
I always think of # as being a sharp sign
I always think of a tic-tac-toe game.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
On 11/22/2013 1:34 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
Ruth Ann wrote:
OT maybe, but does anyone know the name for @ ?
Something I have been trying to discover for years :-)
Ruth Ann,
Cincinnati, OH USA
It depends who you ask, and in what language ;o) Unicode calls it
commercial at. The article about it
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Then there are the younger users that know # only as hash-tag and
not pound-sign. Yes many of the standard characters have different
names depending on the languages used.
In the UK, # is more commonly known as hash or number sign.
For us, pound sign usually
David Gast wrote:
I have two ideas.
Interestingly, Windows Vista's Character Map utility (and probably
also Windows 7's?) has similar ideas...
1. Highlight the categories, so it is easy to tell where the category starts
and ends.
Vista's character map has an option to group by Unicode
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Then there are the younger users that know # only as hash-tag and
not pound-sign. Yes many of the standard characters have different
names depending on the languages used.
In the UK, # is more commonly known as hash or number sign.
For us, pound sign usually
On 11/21/2013 02:00 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Then there are the younger users that know # only as hash-tag and
not pound-sign. Yes many of the standard characters have different
names depending on the languages used.
In the UK, # is more commonly known as hash
, Nov 16, 2013 at 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request - Categories for special
characters
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
At 17:35 16/11/2013 +, Toki Jonathon Kantoor wrote:
Under what circumstances would one be using glyphs they know not the name
of?
Many people do
] Feature Request - Categories for special
characters
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
At 17:35 16/11/2013 +, Toki Jonathon Kantoor wrote:
Under what circumstances would one be using glyphs they know not the name
of?
Many people do not know the name ampersand. No-one knows what @ is
called
the more things change, the more they stay the same ;-)
This is quite an interesting list; thanks for sharing.
From: Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com
Date: Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request - Categories for special
On 11/15/2013 05:17 PM, Paul wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:34:33 -0500
Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
On 11/15/2013 01:19 PM, Paul wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:06:05 +
jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds simple enough (and useful) to me, and I'm
On 11/15/2013 10:17 PM, Paul wrote:
That still doesn't make any sense. What is this theoretical 2000 page maximum?
Unicode allows for 1,114,112 different glyphs, excluding variants.
with variants, you are looking at roughly 1,750,000 glyphs.
And why would the glyph's position be known?
On 11/16/2013 08:17 PM, Paul wrote:
Unicode allows for 1,114,112 different glyphs, excluding variants.
with variants, you are looking at roughly 1,750,000 glyphs.
And so... how does this relate to 2000 pages?
The largest currently available Pan-Unicode font contains roughly
100,000 glyphs.
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 21:59:04 +
jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/16/2013 08:17 PM, Paul wrote:
Taking, thorn, for example, with the current setup, one knows to
look in the Runic range.
You might, but that doesn't mean everybody does.
Only if one has paid absolutely no
Sounds simple enough (and useful) to me, and I'm not sure I agree with
e-letter's objection above,
Instead of the current theoretical maximum of 2000 page to search for a
rarely used glyph, whose position is known, you'd have to search through
25000 pages for a glyph whose position is both
On 11/15/2013 01:19 PM, Paul wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:06:05 +
jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds simple enough (and useful) to me, and I'm not sure I agree
with e-letter's objection above,
Instead of the current theoretical maximum of 2000 page to search for
a rarely
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:34:33 -0500
Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
On 11/15/2013 01:19 PM, Paul wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:06:05 +
jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds simple enough (and useful) to me, and I'm not sure I agree
with e-letter's
From: Regina Henschel [rb.hensc...@t-online.de]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 07:55
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request - Categories for special
characters
Hi Steve,
Steve Gruspier schrieb:
Hello:
I was wondering if this was the place
On 13/11/2013, Steve Gruspier s...@alfred.edu wrote:
Hello:
I was wondering if this was the place to request a feature. I was
Perhaps as discussion, then submit via bugzilla.
thinking the Special Character section is very cluttered. My feature
request is a setting that would narrow
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:12:46 +
e-letter inp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/11/2013, Steve Gruspier s...@alfred.edu wrote:
thinking the Special Character section is very cluttered. My
feature request is a setting that would narrow down special
characters to ones that are used in specific
On 11/13/2013 04:28 PM, Steve Gruspier wrote:
Hello:
I was wondering if this was the place to request a feature. I was
thinking the Special Character section is very cluttered. My feature
request is a setting that would narrow down special characters to ones
that are used in specific fields
Hi Steve,
Steve Gruspier schrieb:
Hello:
I was wondering if this was the place to request a feature. I was
thinking the Special Character section is very cluttered. My feature
request is a setting that would narrow down special characters to ones
that are used in specific fields such as
On 11/14/2013 10:55 AM, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi Steve,
Steve Gruspier schrieb:
Hello:
I was wondering if this was the place to request a feature. I was
thinking the Special Character section is very cluttered. My feature
request is a setting that would narrow down special characters to ones
34 matches
Mail list logo
