So of course, right after sending this, I found a workaround for my
particular use case - switching from DELEGATE_ONLY to DELEGATE_FIRST got my
tests passing. But I'm still curious to know if there's a way to do this in
general. =)
A.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Andrew Bayer
So I've got a DSL that has a section that looks like
https://gist.github.com/abayer/a0bfbb531457e79aabc8d6c25d992e62, which ends
up translating (via
Assuming the AST can’t already form the right signature in the JAR for IDE to
see, I can think of one solution:
public class MacroMethods {
@Macro public static T safe(T param) {
def ctx = Macros.macroContext
def exp = Macros.getExpression(param)
//original code from example…
}
Hey Jason,
Left a comment on #3.
Yes, the method signature of Macro methods is not the same as the call
site. But, for the given call site, IDE can easily determine the signature,
and I'm pretty sure it has all the information already. Plus, this is a new
language feature anyway, so IDE will
Hey, everyone.
It's been awhile since last time I participated in Groovy.
I was mostly in read-only mode for the last two years.
With this move, I hope to change it.
I created a proposal for macro methods (no ETA, initially aimed to 3.0)
because I think they are great for the future of Groovy
Great, yeah that would be a big help, since efficiency over the wire
for JSON services is a big deal and the unicode escaping doesn't help
there.
Also, can we consider https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/429 as an
improvement? Again it makes using StreamingJsonBuilder more efficient
and
