It was thus said that the Great Daniel Reinhardt once stated:
>
> ISPs will soon
> >start to provide their customers with routers that support IPv6, so
> >this is in my opinion a wise decision. It's a bit like TV
> >manucfaturers including a DVB-T tuner in their offerings, even though
> >most peop
What a nasty member of the user list!
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Daniel Reinhardt wrote:
>
> ISPs will soon
>
>> start to provide their customers with routers that support IPv6, so
>> this is in my opinion a wise decision. It's a bit like TV
>> manucfaturers including a DVB-T tuner in their
ISPs will soon
start to provide their customers with routers that support IPv6, so
this is in my opinion a wise decision. It's a bit like TV
manucfaturers including a DVB-T tuner in their offerings, even though
most people don't have a need for it, yet.
Krist
And until that day happens, then
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Daniel Reinhardt
wrote:
> Actually it has everything to do with it. IPv6 is useless to me on a small
> HOME LAN of 5 computers. It should be disabled by default, and an allowable
> option by those who wish to use IPv6. It shouldn't be forced down peoples
> throa
* Daniel Reinhardt [2009-12-04 09:31]:
> Its like how Linux/Unix Distribution Creaters forcing IPv6 in a
> kernel when someone may not have a need for it or find it useless.
> They should instead build their distributions with IPv4 enabled by
> default, and include a IPv6 enabled Kernel for those
From: "William A. Rowe Jr."
Sent: 04 December, 2009 8:51
To:
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Building Apache 2.2 without IPv6
But if APR *detected* IPv6 functions, that functionality is enabled. If
your packager dropped you an IPv6 enabled package and an IPv4 kernel, that
is their mista
Daniel Reinhardt wrote:
> From: "William A. Rowe Jr."
> Sent: 04 December, 2009 7:03
> To:
> Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Building Apache 2.2 without IPv6
>
>> Zachary Uram wrote:
>>> Krist I prefer IPv4 addressing. I can remember 128.2.10.12 but I can
From: "William A. Rowe Jr."
Sent: 04 December, 2009 7:03
To:
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Building Apache 2.2 without IPv6
Zachary Uram wrote:
Krist I prefer IPv4 addressing. I can remember 128.2.10.12 but I can't
remember some insane IPv6 hexadecimal address! lol. And I love m
Zachary Uram wrote:
> Krist I prefer IPv4 addressing. I can remember 128.2.10.12 but I can't
> remember some insane IPv6 hexadecimal address! lol. And I love my
> commands such as ping, traceroute, dig, host, nslookup etc.
This has nothing to do with why to enable IPv6 in APR.
Look, the IPv6 API
Krist I prefer IPv4 addressing. I can remember 128.2.10.12 but I can't
remember some insane IPv6 hexadecimal address! lol. And I love my
commands such as ping, traceroute, dig, host, nslookup etc.
Zach
-
The official User-To-User
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Daniel Reinhardt
wrote:
> Krist,
>
> First of all I came here for help with disabling IPv6 not a testimony from
> other users on how useful it is for a small LAN.
>
> Give me one good reason why IPv6 is useful for a small home LAN where I can
> use 192.168.0.0/16 an
From: "Jeff Trawick"
Sent: 03 December, 2009 17:36
To:
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Building Apache 2.2 without IPv6
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Daniel Reinhardt
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Daniel Reinhardt
wrote:
Jeff,
I have done the below with --disable-
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Daniel Reinhardt
wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Daniel Reinhardt
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jeff,
>>>
>>> I have done the below with --disable-ipv6 in my configure options, but it
>>> still builds it with IPv6 Enabled.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:43 AM, D
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Daniel Reinhardt
wrote:
Jeff,
I have done the below with --disable-ipv6 in my configure options, but it
still builds it with IPv6 Enabled.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Daniel Reinhardt
wrote:
How would I tell apr to leave out IPv6 when compiling?
Add -
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Daniel Reinhardt
wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> I have done the below with --disable-ipv6 in my configure options, but it
> still builds it with IPv6 Enabled.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Daniel Reinhardt
> wrote:
>>
>> How would I tell apr to leave out IPv6 when comp
b/apr/configure --help if using bundled
APR)
--
From: "Jeff Trawick"
Sent: 03 December, 2009 11:36
To:
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Building Apache 2.2 without IPv6
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Daniel Reinhardt
wrote:
How would I tell a
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Daniel Reinhardt
wrote:
>
> How would I tell apr to leave out IPv6 when compiling?
Add --disable-ipv6 to your configure options.
Hint: ./configure --help (and srclib/apr/configure --help if using bundled APR)
-
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Daniel Reinhardt
wrote:
> All,
>
> I want to build Apache 2.2.14 without any referrence to IPv6. I have removed
> IPv6 support from the Kernel, because I find it useless on a small home LAN.
>
> How would I tell apr to leave out IPv6 when compiling?
The first quest
All,
I want to build Apache 2.2.14 without any referrence to IPv6. I have removed
IPv6 support from the Kernel, because I find it useless on a small home LAN.
How would I tell apr to leave out IPv6 when compiling?
Thanks,
Daniel Reinhardt
19 matches
Mail list logo
