On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 15:55 -0700, David Aronchick wrote:
> Is it possible (or inadvisable) to run apache using
> the /usr/sbin/apache binary directly? Is there any significant
> production issues that might arise?
Your working shell environment gets inherited by the server.
That could be a
FWIW, I went another way here - with apache. Rather than pegging the
container to apache running, I used Kubernetes to health check the app, and
simply catted out the log files to stdio. It's not really the "docker-way"
of one process per container, but it's working pretty well.
The idea was
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 07:33:30 -0700
Kurtis Rader wrote:
> I don't understand what the problem is. If you're starting a single-program
> to do exactly one task (e.g., server individual HTTP requests serially)
That's an unusual use for a general-purpose webserver.
However,
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, David Aronchick
wrote:
> I hadn't thought of the fact that apache would be architected to use its
> multiple threads as an internal housekeeping (instead of just to allow
> parallelization of requests).
>
You misunderstood me. I don't know
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:17 PM, David Aronchick wrote:
> /usr/sbin/apache2 -DFOREGROUND -DNO_DETACH -f /etc/apache2/apache2.conf
There's also -DONE_PROCESS. But like the others, it's meant for
debugging. I wouldn't turn all of these on to pass some
docker/microservices
tober 26, 2015 7:34 AM
> *To:* users@httpd.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for
> Docker Container?
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, David Aronchick <aronch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I hadn't thought of
Please do not email me anymore
From: Kurtis Rader [mailto:kra...@skepticism.us]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 7:34 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Running Apache in Single Process Mode for Docker
Container?
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, David Aronchick
<aro
On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 21:11 -0700, Kurtis Rader wrote:
>
> I'm going to assume that by "single process" you meant "single user".
If you read the docs, you'll find single process mode
described ("httpd -X"). It has nothing to do with single
user. I regularly run it in single-process mode for
I may be wrong, but I believe you are looking for this (to keep apache
attached to the shell):
http://zroger.com/blog/apache-in-the-foreground/
You could also take a look at this, as it may already be taking care
of what you seem to be looking for:
Thank you, this is very helpful! Is there any way to get an output of all
the items on the command line ultimately used by apachectl? For example,
when I do the following, it fails - I assume I'm missing something.
$ source /etc/apache2/envvars
$ /usr/sbin/apache2 -f
You probably have envvars set by your init scripts to define a bunch
of variables used in sections in your conf.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:26 PM, David Aronchick wrote:
> Thank you, this is very helpful! Is there any way to get an output of all
> the items on the command
Is it possible (or inadvisable) to run apache using the /usr/sbin/apache
binary directly? Is there any significant production issues that might
arise?
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:26 PM, David Aronchick
wrote:
> I appreciate your feedback. I apologize for providing additional
I hadn't thought of the fact that apache would be architected to use its
multiple threads as an internal housekeeping (instead of just to allow
parallelization of requests).
My motivation behind moving the processes to be so low is that I'm trying
to explore Apache's suitability for use in a
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:26 PM, David Aronchick
wrote:
> I appreciate your feedback. I apologize for providing additional context
> about my question, I won't do that in the future.
>
No need to apologize. It just sounded like you were asking for advice about
making a
Unfortunately, no joy (this is using apachectl, not /usr/sbin/apache) :(
root 339 0.0 0.0 8868 904 ?S+ 02:38 0:00 \_ grep
--color=auto apache
root 1 0.0 0.0 4448 780 ?Ss Oct25 0:00 /bin/sh
/usr/sbin/apache2ctl -DFOREGROUND -DNO_DETACH
root
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:55 PM, David Aronchick
wrote:
> Is it possible (or inadvisable) to run apache using the /usr/sbin/apache
> binary directly? Is there any significant production issues that might
> arise?
>
Run the binary directly as opposed to what? If you mean via
Thanks for all the help all! I dug into the apachectl and realized I was
using the config file in sites-enabled, instead of the top level
/etc/apache2/apache.conf file. The latter file installs all the modules in
/mods-enabled, which is what was missing. (for the curious, I also had to
copy all
I appreciate your feedback. I apologize for providing additional context
about my question, I won't do that in the future.
All I'm looking to do is run Apache in single threaded non-forking mode,
and output all its output to stdio/stderr. I thought that some folks on
this list might have done
You could try starting the service and run "ps auxf | grep apache".
This doesn't always give you all the information, but it could help.
- Y
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:26 PM, David Aronchick
wrote:
> Thank you, this is very helpful! Is there any way to get an output of all
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 7:26 PM, David Aronchick
wrote:
> Thank you, this is very helpful! Is there any way to get an output of all
> the items on the command line ultimately used by apachectl? For example,
> when I do the following, it fails - I assume I'm missing
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:17 PM, David Aronchick
wrote:
> Thanks for all the help all! I dug into the apachectl and realized I was
> using the config file in sites-enabled, instead of the top level
> /etc/apache2/apache.conf file. The latter file installs all the modules in
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:31 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 21:11 -0700, Kurtis Rader wrote:
> > I'm going to assume that by "single process" you meant "single user".
>
> If you read the docs, you'll find single process mode
> described ("httpd -X"). It has
I understand it's not a best practice to run Apache in single process mode
for most situations, but what about inside a Docker container?
My goal is to have the logs & errors output to stdio/stderr, and to have
the entire container get killed if the process dies.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 3:35 PM, David Aronchick
wrote:
> I understand it's not a best practice to run Apache in single process mode
> for most situations, but what about inside a Docker container?
>
> My goal is to have the logs & errors output to stdio/stderr, and to have
24 matches
Mail list logo