Hi, Jeroen.
Looking into this thread again, I've discovered also this link [1], telling how
to integrate Fortress on a Wicket app.
I'm sure Martin will have interest on it :)
I agree that it would be quite heavy to use a full RBAC authorization system
based on LDAP.
I'm going to have the
Hi Oscar,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:58 AM, GESCONSULTOR - Óscar Bou
o@gesconsultor.com wrote:
Hi, Jeroen.
Looking into this thread again, I've discovered also this link [1],
telling how to integrate Fortress on a Wicket app.
I'm sure Martin will have interest on it :)
I am aware
On 22 November 2014 at 11:28, Dan Haywood d...@haywood-associates.co.uk
wrote:
I'll add a wiki page soon, but it'll only have the same info as is in this
thread.
just wrapping up this thread: see
OK, folks, I've just committed and pushed [1] to isis-module-security, to
support both factories and contributions (by emitting events for all
actions).
I'll add a wiki page soon, but it'll only have the same info as is in this
thread.
Cheers
Dan
[1]
Greetings
Thanks Dan, a great suggestion and not as crazy complicated as I was
expecting.
One question though: how extensible would the Organization be in this case?
I imagine every use case would require this class to represent something
different.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Dan Haywood
Hi Martin,
The point of this second design is that Organisation is your domain class,
not part of the security module, so it can have whatever you want in it.
Cheers,
Dan
On 21 Nov 2014 09:46, Martin Balmaceda martin.balmac...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings
Thanks Dan, a great suggestion and not
Hi,
I am not familiar with isis security module but isn't it possible to use a
(Shiro) Role as an Organization ?
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:31 AM, johandoornen...@filternet.nl wrote:
- Hi Martin, maybe you can
Im not sure how using a Shiro role would work since they are predefined yet
organizations can be added/removed dynamically
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
I am not familiar with isis security module but isn't it possible to use a
(Shiro) Role
Thank you, I've been wondering what Tenancy was for.
In my particular case though I think it would be passing on the problem,
since I would then need to extend Tenancies somehow.
I think the ideal solution would be to enable the security module to
somehow specify which ApplicationUser domain
Hi all!
I'm following the thread with a lot of interest.
Problem is that this week I'm on holidays without access to the laptop (first
time ever and it's being great :)
I find some points here, nearly all them mentioned before:
- The need for a Tenant / Tenancy entity.
- The need for an
Hi folks,
Great to see this thread with lots of useful contributions from everyone.
~~~
As Jeroen has said, we definitely intend to enhance the security module,
though only as the exact requirements become clear.
For Martin's requirement, to allow an Organization to be associated with
the
Hi Martin,
I would advice against option 2 because you lose an easy update path to
newer versions of the security module.
Tell us more about your use-case so we can see what the options are.
Cheers,
Jeroen
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Martin Balmaceda
martin.balmac...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks I agree, option 1 is much better.
As for my user case: I have a system that hosts a number or organizations
orthogonally. What I need to do is associate each user to exactly 1 org so
that he/she can only see and modify information belonging to that org.
After looking at the problem, I
13 matches
Mail list logo
