Re: Wikidata vs DBpedia

2017-03-19 Thread A. Soroka
This would be a much better question for either the Wikidata mailing list [1] or the DBpedia support system [2]. --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library [1] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata [2] http://wiki.dbpedia.org/support > On Mar 19, 2017, at 11:36 AM, kumar

Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: about TDB JENA

2017-03-19 Thread A. Soroka
Just a side note; Jena offers SPARQL 1.1, which includes property paths [1]. In some situations, they can be used to do some forms of inference (e.g. some kinds of problems involving subsumption) right in your SPARQL queries. --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library [1]

Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: about TDB JENA

2017-03-19 Thread Manuel Enrique Puebla Martinez
I consider that I did not know how to explain correctly in my previous email, I repeat the two questions: 1) I read the page https://jena.apache.org/documentation/tdb/assembler.html, I do not think it is what I need. I work with large OWL2 ontologies from the OWLAPI framework, generated

Wikidata vs DBpedia

2017-03-19 Thread kumar rohit
I am sorry if it is slightly off topic. How Wikidata differs from DBpedia, in terms of building semantic web applications. Wikidata, as I studied as, is a knowledge base which every one can edit? How it differs then from Wikipedia? DBpedia extracts structured data from wikipedia infoboxes and

Re: about TDB JENA

2017-03-19 Thread Lorenz B.
> Is it possible to use some reasoner with RDF data, managed from TDB? Yes, see [1] > > Is it possible to manage an ontology in OWL2 from TDB? What means "manage"? In general you can load and query any RDF data into TDB. The serialization of an OWL ontology can be any RDF format. Obviously,