Data and query samples would help. (I could not see the image.)
But from your problem description, you might try GROUP BY and the
GROUP_CONCAT aggregate function. This would put (for example) all the
properties of a subject in one result field, separated by the delimiter
of your choice.
See the
Dear Apache Enthusiast,
(You’re receiving this message because you’re subscribed to a user@ or
dev@ list of one or more Apache Software Foundation projects.)
We’re pleased to announce the upcoming ApacheCon [1] in Montréal,
September 24-27. This event is all about you — the Apache project
Hi Andreas,
I had a similar scenario, but as Dave said there is no choose-a-enum-value
reasoner for that. What I did was picking the RDFS and owl:sameAs rules
from the rule files in Jena source and instantiate a GenericRuleReasoner
with my custom rule file. Docs for how to do this are here:
Hi dear jena users,
Here is a question regarding how to output a SPARQL result set into a
Google SpreadSheet with a concatenation mode.
We have been using a SPARQL RESULT set in order to feed a google
spreadsheet.
The result is below. There is nothing new, we get one line result for each
match
Hi Eric,
Another thing I noticed is that you said you were manually loading the data via
the GUI after Apache Jena Fuseki has started. Maybe that data is not stored in
the correct location (i.e. the baseModel of the InfModel) and there the
reasoning fails?
You could try to load the data on
Eric,
Glad we have got the configuration sorted out.
This is now a different problem which isn't a matter of getting the
right configuration. I don't know what's going on yet; it's also not a
quick thing to look at and address.
I've recorded it as
Hi Andreas,
Jena does not currently have any alternative built reasoner for RDFS +
owl:sameAs and I'm not aware of any such "equality reasoner" being in
development. You could try Pellet, which may offer better performance.
In fact equality reasoning is notoriously expensive in the general
