Given the input so far, it seems JSON-LD 1.1 should be the default for
both parsing and writing in the next release (Jena 4.5.0). Written
JSON-LD would not include a @content entry "@version" - that breaks
JSON-LD 1.0 processing.
Andy
On 11/03/2022 10:38, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Jena has
True
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022, 5:36 AM Andy Seaborne wrote:
> (this isn't a JSON-LD 1.0 vs 1.1 issue)
>
> On 24/04/2022 18:49, Dan Davis wrote:
> > The dependency exists whether it is explicit or not, because the
> ecosystem
> > of packages that validate JSON documents rev
(this isn't a JSON-LD 1.0 vs 1.1 issue)
On 24/04/2022 18:49, Dan Davis wrote:
The dependency exists whether it is explicit or not, because the ecosystem
of packages that validate JSON documents revolves around JSON Schema, and
is not as mature for JSON-LD, at least in my limited experience. I
ys bothered me that JSONSchema is not an official standard
> in
> >>> the way that XML and RDF/XML are. I know that JSON-LD 1 and 2 are more
> >>> standardized under W3C, but they depend so much on JSONSchema. Last I
> >>> checked, JSON Schema DRAFT 4 was the closest t
better now?
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 2:40 PM Paul Tyson
wrote:
On Apr 23, 2022, at 12:16, Andy Seaborne wrote:
What should the default settings be JSON-LD 1.0 or 1.1?
1.1 would better meet my use cases.
Thanks,
—Paul
Schema. Last I
> > checked, JSON Schema DRAFT 4 was the closest to a schema. Is the story
> any
> > better now?
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 2:40 PM Paul Tyson
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Apr 23, 2022, at 12:16, Andy S
22 at 2:40 PM Paul Tyson wrote:
On Apr 23, 2022, at 12:16, Andy Seaborne wrote:
What should the default settings be JSON-LD 1.0 or 1.1?
1.1 would better meet my use cases.
Thanks,
—Paul
FWIW, 1.1 works better for my use cases which are currently all Linked Art
centric.
https://linked.art
Dave Beaudet
On Apr 23, 2022 13:16, Andy Seaborne wrote:
What should the default settings be JSON-LD 1.0 or 1.1?
It is not a simple choice.
There is slightly pretty writing of JSON-LD
now?
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 2:40 PM Paul Tyson wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 23, 2022, at 12:16, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >
> > What should the default settings be JSON-LD 1.0 or 1.1?
> >
> 1.1 would better meet my use cases.
>
> Thanks,
> —Paul
>
>
> On Apr 23, 2022, at 12:16, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> What should the default settings be JSON-LD 1.0 or 1.1?
>
1.1 would better meet my use cases.
Thanks,
—Paul
What should the default settings be JSON-LD 1.0 or 1.1?
It is not a simple choice.
There is slightly pretty writing of JSON-LD 1.1 now - prefixes and
native types.
A new issue is
e.g. https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1254
JSON-LD 1.1 is not completely backwards compatible with JSON-LD
On 15/03/2022 18:13, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
Hi,
Are the output "flavors" for JSON-LD 1.0 only then?
https://jena.apache.org/documentation/io/rdf-output.html#json-ld
Yes.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:39 AM Andy Seaborne wrote:
Jena has both JSON 1.0, provided by jsonld-java, and
Hi,
Are the output "flavors" for JSON-LD 1.0 only then?
https://jena.apache.org/documentation/io/rdf-output.html#json-ld
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:39 AM Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> Jena has both JSON 1.0, provided by jsonld-java, and JSON-LD 1.1,
> provided by Titanium.
>
> What should the
Jena has both JSON 1.0, provided by jsonld-java, and JSON-LD 1.1,
provided by Titanium.
What should the default settings be?
For parsing that means what is bound to "application/ld+json" and file
extension .jsonld.
For writing, it means what is setup for Lang.JSONLD.
This is two decisions
14 matches
Mail list logo
