Does it have to be an XMLLitral?
While RDF 1.1 at least makes rdf:XMLLiteal, a datatype like another
datatype (it had special status as built-in in RDF 1.0), the formal
definition hasn't changed, canonicalization and all because it may be
output in RDF/XML, so it's got to be at least self cont
I would be willing to fix the XHTML as well, but I haven't found a way
to identify exactly what causes the problem.
I'm attaching the file, maybe that helps.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Martynas Jusevičius
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> is this possible? Or is there a workaround?
>
> I need XMLLiteral a
Hey,
is this possible? Or is there a workaround?
I need XMLLiteral as embedded XML (actually XHTML) regardless if it's
canonical or not, otherwise XSLT processing breaks. I've tuned the
XHTML quite sucessfully, but still there are some large literals
failing, even though they look canonical to me
