Re: Would it make sense to use GraphQL with Fuseki as a backend?

2017-05-01 Thread james anderson
good afternoon; > On 2017-05-01, at 09:58, Laura Morales wrote: > >> Do you have any implementation for GraphQL on Jena? > > Nope. I was simply wondering if it would make sense to define an API with > GraphQL, and use Fuseki (via HTTP requests) as a "resolver" function for the > various Graph

Re: Would it make sense to use GraphQL with Fuseki as a backend?

2017-05-01 Thread Laura Morales
> Do you have any implementation for GraphQL on Jena? Nope. I was simply wondering if it would make sense to define an API with GraphQL, and use Fuseki (via HTTP requests) as a "resolver" function for the various GraphQL "types". I have this question because from my understanding, GraphQL calls

Re: Would it make sense to use GraphQL with Fuseki as a backend?

2017-05-01 Thread Lorenz B.
Do you have any implementation for GraphQL on Jena? > Would it make sense to use GraphQL with Fuseki as a backend? > -- Lorenz Bühmann AKSW group, University of Leipzig Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center

Re: Would it make sense to use GraphQL with Fuseki as a backend?

2017-04-30 Thread james anderson
good afternoon; > On 2017-04-30, at 11:53, Laura Morales wrote: > > Would it make sense to use GraphQL with Fuseki as a backend? you posed the question in different terms some time ago. now, after wrangling sparql for two months, you remain unconvinced and raise the question agai

Would it make sense to use GraphQL with Fuseki as a backend?

2017-04-30 Thread Laura Morales
Would it make sense to use GraphQL with Fuseki as a backend?