Re: rdf:parseType="literal" vs. rdf:datatype="...XMLLiteral"

2024-04-22 Thread Thomas Francart
Hello This is 3.17.0. Pretty old, due to other dependency with TopQuadrant SHACL API. Thomas Le sam. 20 avr. 2024 à 18:06, Andy Seaborne a écrit : > Hi Thomas, > > Which version of Jena is this? > > Andy > > On 19/04/2024 17:18, Thomas Francart wrote: > > Hello > > > > The RDF/XML

Re: ModelExtract

2024-04-22 Thread Dutkowski, Simon
Hi Andy We dealing a lot with DCAT-AP catalogues. Sometimes it is necessary to extract a single dataset as a separate model. Unfortunately, they can contain references to other datasets, were we need to stop. Best Simon -- Dipl.-Inf. Simon Dutkowski Fraunhofer FOKUS (DPS)

Fuseki growing in size and need for compaction

2024-04-22 Thread Balduin Landolt
Hello, we're running Fuseki 5.0.0 (but previously the last 4.x versions behaved essentially the same) with roughly 40 Mio triples (tendency: growing). Not sure what configuration is relevant, but we have the default graph as the union graph. Also, we use Fuseki as our main database, not just as a

Re: rdf:parseType="literal" vs. rdf:datatype="...XMLLiteral"

2024-04-22 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 22/04/2024 08:02, Thomas Francart wrote: Hello This is 3.17.0. Pretty old, due to other dependency with TopQuadrant SHACL API. It's not perfect in 5.0.0 either. TopQuadrant SHACL is now 4.10.0. It would be good to upgrade because of XML security issue fixes around Jena 4.3.2. It is