Thank you Martynas, I got it... It confused me slightly because it was my
first time I executed CONSTRUCT using Jena code.
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Martynas Jusevičius <
marty...@atomgraph.com> wrote:
> Because there are 2 forms of SPARQL queries:
> - ASK and SELECT return ResultSet
Because there are 2 forms of SPARQL queries:
- ASK and SELECT return ResultSet (table of variable bindings)
- CONSTRUCT and DESCRIBE return Model (RDF graph = triples)
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:58 PM, javed khan wrote:
> Hello Martynas, it finally showed the result.
>
>
Hello Martynas, it finally showed the result.
But I did not understand the code. Why we assign the result to a Model? Why
not resultset.
Model results = qexec.execConstruct() ;
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Martynas Jusevičius <
marty...@atomgraph.com> wrote:
> This means your query
This means your query hasn't matched anything.
Show us your data.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:42 PM, javed khan wrote:
> In response to my question earlier, I replace this
>
> ResultSet results = (ResultSet) qexec.execConstruct() ;
>
> with
>
> Model results =
In response to my question earlier, I replace this
ResultSet results = (ResultSet) qexec.execConstruct() ;
with
Model results = qexec.execConstruct() ;
results.write(System.out, "TURTLE");
But how can I get the require result i.e value of ?z and ?y
I expect the following result:
Bob
Hello
What is the problem in this query: 'Male' is string literal here. (The
query works inside Protege)
CONSTRUCT { ?x mo:hasUncle ?y } WHERE { ?x mo:hasParents ?z .?z
mo:Gender 'Male' . ?z mo:hasBrother ?y}
Query query = QueryFactory.create(str);
QueryExecution qexec =
An alternate approach to Lucene + fuseki, though decidedly less Open Source,
is to use the MarkLogic connector for Jena.
MarkLogic is a document store with highly sophisticated text analytics and
search, plus it also supports triples, graphs
+ SPARQL. Documents can embed both complex markup,
As Andy said this has been asked before on this list and others. I'm guessing
this is an academic question?
As such you need to research what SPARQL and rules are designed to do. When you
understand that you can compare them. Whether one is faster than the other
depends on the implementation.
This has been asked before, most recently 2017-08-14.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ae4c1f5dfbacfb9bf4294a4cf2967e0c7050c81b20f80e6c425a9aa8@%3Cusers.jena.apache.org%3E
Please search the archives before asking questions.
Andy
On 24/08/17 08:50, tina sani wrote:
What are some of
Le 02/08/2017 à 18:39, Élie Roux a écrit :
Subclassing ShellGraph and overriding the methods like
writePredicateObjectList would be my approach. Too much is private
to really subclass - you'll need to copy the class at them moment.
Along with registration, then at least you can have both in the
What are some of advantages of SPARQL over (Jena) rules? I know only that
SPARQL is W3C recommendation and jena rules are not. Similarly, Jena rules
are monotonic which does not add/remove any data just infer new knowledge.
How SPARQL is more expressive than rules?
If we get some inference using
11 matches
Mail list logo