Re: InsertPic_(12-07(12-07-21-26-31)

OK. I explain my project in the following The KG schema is composed of a set of semantic types like disease or drugs, and a set of relations like treated_by(disease, drug). Then each instance relation, like treated_by(disease_1, drug_1) has an annotation property 'year' which means this

Re: InsertPic_(12-07(12-07-21-26-31)

Hello, I'm curious if slightly changing the SPARQL query can have an impact on performance, maybe you could try something like: where { ?object MKG:English_name 'Pyrilamine' . ?RelAttr owl:annotatedTarget ?object ; owl:annotatedSource ?subject ;

Re: InsertPic_(12-07(12-07-21-26-31)

Let's slow down here a bit. We can't give you any reasonable advice until you tell us _much_ more about your work. What is the data like? What kinds of queries are you doing? How are you running them? What do you expect to happen? Please give us a great deal more context. ajs6f > On Dec 7,

Re: InsertPic_(12-07(12-07-21-26-31)

I store the 1.4B triples in two steps. Firstly, I made 886 rdf files, each of which contains 1615837 triples. Then, I upload them into TDB using Fuseki. This is a huge job. Are you sure that named graphs have better performance? Then how to build named graphs? On 12/7/2018 23:48，Vincent

Re: InsertPic_(12-07(12-07-21-26-31)

Do you mean -Xms = 64G ? N.B. : with 1.4 B triples, you should have better performance using named graphs. Le 07/12/2018 à 16:37, 胡云苹 a écrit : > My memory is 64G and my setting is no upper limit. > On 12/7/2018 23:34，Vincent Ventresque > wrote： > >

Re: InsertPic_(12-07(12-07-21-26-31)

My memory is 64G and my setting is no upper limit. On 12/7/2018 23:34，Vincent Ventresque wrote： Hello How do you run fuseki? you can increase java memory limit with java options : java -jar -Xms4096m -Xmx4096m fuseki-server.jar (where 4096m = 4 Go, but could be 8192m or more) N.B. : I'm

sparql 1.4 billion triples

Dear jena, How to ask questions in https://markmail.org/search/? I have built a graph with 1.4 billion triples and store it as a data set in TDB through Fuseki upload system. Now, I try to make some sparql search, the speed is very slow. For example, when I make the sqarql in Fuseki in

sparql 1.4 billion triples

Dear jena, I have built a graph with 1.4 billion triples and store it as a data set in TDB through Fuseki upload system. Now, I try to make some sparql search, the speed is very slow. For example, when I make the sqarql in Fuseki in the following, it takes 50 seconds. How can I improve the

Re: Is there any way to keep same size between real data and TDB

On 07/12/2018 01:03, Lee, Seokju | Daniel | TPDD wrote: Greetings, I am using Apache Jena 3.7.0 now and encounter the following issue so I would like to know how to solve it. Background: * We created our own sparql endpoint for using apache jena. * Sometimes we need to clear