Hello,
I have complex SPARQL queries, which I would like to divide into several parts
(like function definitions), in order to reuse these parts among different
SPARQL queries and in order to make a single SPARQL query easier to understand.
What are my options to achieve this?
I had a
Hello,
I have complex SPARQL queries, which I would like to divide into several parts
(like function definitions), in order to reuse these parts among different
SPARQL queries and in order to make a single SPARQL query easier to understand.
What are my options to achieve this?
I had a look at
You can search for rdfs here: http://prefix.cc/
This leads to a document where rdfs:subClassOf is defined.
On Tue, 07 Mar 2017 14:58:20 +0100 kumar rohit
wrote
> I have a rule like if x is type of Student and student rdfs:subclass of
> Human, then x is
adopt it.
>
> Rob
>
> On 26/10/2016 14:44, "Simon Schäfer" <m...@antoras.de> wrote:
>
> So far it was mostly theoretical thinking, I don't know yet how many
> triples I may get in the end. In my tests Jenas dataset takes already about
>
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:09:28 +0200 Joint wrote
>
>
> Hi.
> I implemented a multi TDB cluster which I think would do what you want. But
> it's memory hungry on the front end because of the way it needs to distinct
> the multiple TDB streams.
>
where the data is stored.
>
> Hmm.. I need to think about that.
>
> Claude
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Simon Schäfer <m...@antoras.de> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:06:28 +0200 Claude
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:06:28 +0200 Claude Warren wrote
> I implemented a custom search engine when I worked at the Digital
> Enterprise Research Institute. (
>
job of the Linked Data indexer to
figure out how to split up the data and how to handle the queries correctly.
>
> Andy
>
>
> On 26/10/16 11:18, Simon Schäfer wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:44:29 +0200 Rob Vesse <
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:16:56 +0200 Martynas Jusevičius
wrote
> Simon,
>
> with LDT, every application is a service, backed by SPARQL dataset,
> and driven by an ontology.
What is a LDT service to you? Can it be a Java application that uses Linked
On Sun, 21 Aug 2016 23:31:30 +0200 Martynas Jusevičius
wrote
> Simon,
>
> I think Linked Data Templates could be something that you are looking for:
> https://github.com/AtomGraph/Linked-Data-Templates/tree/master/XML%20London%202016%20paper
On Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:34:10 +0200 A. Soroka wrote
> Just for information, you might want to look at SSWAP:
>
> http://sswap.info/
> http://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2105-10-309
>
> They used OWL to assemble web
Hello,
Right now I'm designing a distributed software system whose components (or
services) communicate through protocols. In order to minimize the efforts to
create and handle protocols I had the idea to only use linked data for
communication.
I would like to use SPARQL to send requests to
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:26:01 +0200 Dave Reynolds
wrote
>
> Nothing is stored on disk in that snippet, looks like it's all running
> in memory.
>
> Even if your real base model the data were on disk the reasoner
> information would still be
On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 22:47:35 +0200 Dave Reynolds
wrote
>
> The RDFS and (useful subsets of) OWL semantics are provided by the
> building reasoner configurations - no need to write your own rules for
> those.
I managed to build an example that
On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 04:20:51 +0200 Adrian Walker
wrote
> Simon,
>
> May I ask please, what is the end-user application that is to be supported
> with the techniques you describe?
It is difficult to describe for me because it is a research project.
On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 10:28:55 +0200 Dave Reynolds
wrote
>
> This doesn't matter for your later questions but this example looks like
> it is confusing classes and properties.
>
> s: seems to be a property so the relationship between sc: and sd:
The email-server seems to have screwed the code examples. I uploaded them here
for better viewing:
https://gist.github.com/sschaef/9ebdd724e71aaaf3dae09d7dc623
On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 01:23:05 +0200 Simon Schäfer
m...@antoras.dewrote
Hello there,
I'm currently designing
Hello there,
I'm currently designing a system on top of Jena (or on top of semantic web
technologies in general) and I arrived at the point where I need to get
inference support for SPARQL queries up and running. I looked at
https://jena.apache.org/documentation/inference/ but I'm having
18 matches
Mail list logo