riginal Message-
> From: kant kodali [mailto:kanth...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 5:18 AM
> To: users@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: why did Kafka choose pull instead of push for a consumer ?
>
> @Gerard
> Here are my initial benchmarks
> Producer on
at once. If all
the replicas fail around the same time you could lose data.
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: kant kodali [mailto:kanth...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 5:18 AM
To: users@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: why did Kafka choose pull instead of push for a consumer
pace, slow consumers do not slow the
>
> > >
>
> > > complete
>
> > >
>
> > > system down.
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
> I'm only guessing here regarding if this is the reason:
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > Pull is much more sensible when a lot of data is pushed through. It
>
> > allows
>
> > >
&g
gt; >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Rad
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 5:14 AM, Radoslaw Gruchalski ra...@gruchalski.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > I'm only guessing here regarding if this is the reason:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Pull is much more sensible when a lot of data is pushed through. It
> allows
> >
> > consumers consuming at their own pace, slow consumers do not slow the
> >
> > complete
> >
> > system down.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Rad
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 11:18 AM +0200, "kant kodali"
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> why did Kafka choose pull instead of push for a consumer? push sounds like
>
> it
>
>
>
>
> is more realtime to me than poll and also wouldn't poll just keeps polling
>
> even
>
>
>
>
> when they are no messages in the broker causing more traffic? please
>
> enlighten
>
>
>
>
> me
Best regards,
Rad
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 11:18 AM +0200, "kant kodali"
wrote:
why did Kafka choose pull instead of push for a consumer? push sounds like
it
is more realtim
ull is much more sensible when a lot of data is pushed through. It allows
>
> consumers consuming at their own pace, slow consumers do not slow the
>
> complete
>
> system down.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
Best regards,
Rad
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 11:18 AM +0200, "kant kodali"
wrote:
why did Kafka choose pull instead of push for a consumer? push sounds like
it
i
ough. It allows
consumers consuming at their own pace, slow consumers do not slow the
complete
system down.
--
Best regards,
Rad
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 11:18 AM +0200, "kant kodali"
wrote:
why did Kafka choose pull instead of push for a con
200, "kant kodali"
wrote:
why did Kafka choose pull instead of push for a consumer? push sounds like it
is more realtime to me than poll and also wouldn't poll just keeps polling even
when they are no messages in the broker causing more traffic? please enlighten
me
"kant kodali"
wrote:
why did Kafka choose pull instead of push for a consumer? push sounds like it
is more realtime to me than poll and also wouldn't poll just keeps polling even
when they are no messages in the broker causing more traffic? please enlighten
me
why did Kafka choose pull instead of push for a consumer? push sounds like it
is more realtime to me than poll and also wouldn't poll just keeps polling even
when they are no messages in the broker causing more traffic? please enlighten
me
14 matches
Mail list logo
