Re: query related to binfo

Am 26.05.20, 17:44, schrieb ritesh rao: I just wish to know if we set the binfo will that affect the smpp at smsc side , in other words is binfo is part of smpp protocol ? or binfo is used for kannel level only? the 'binfo' field is an abstracted billing identifier/info field, which

query related to binfo

Hi I just wish to know if we set the binfo will that affect the smpp at smsc side , in other words is binfo is part of smpp protocol ? or binfo is used for kannel level only? Regards Manoj Raul

Binfo on long messages

Hi Kannel users. When sending long messages with binfo attached, the binfo value is attached to each message fragment. I wonder if binfo should not be handled in the same way as dlr (which is only set on the first message fragment). /Jacob

Re: binfo and NACK Status

, Oren -הודעה מקורית- מאת: Oren Ein-gal נשלח: ד 30/04/2008 16:15 אל: users@kannel.org נושא: binfo and NACK Status Hello list, I have a Kannel version 1.4.1 with EMI2 configuration working perfectly. The operator wants me to send a transaction ID (number) together with the message

RE: binfo and NACK Status

Hello list, Does any one have an answer? Thanks, Oren -הודעה מקורית- מאת: Oren Ein-gal נשלח: ד 30/04/2008 16:15 אל: users@kannel.org נושא: binfo and NACK Status Hello list, I have a Kannel version 1.4.1 with EMI2 configuration working perfectly. The operator wants me to send

binfo and NACK Status

Hello list, I have a Kannel version 1.4.1 with EMI2 configuration working perfectly. The operator wants me to send a transaction ID (number) together with the message (Extra Service section - XSER) I have read the manual and it seems I can use the binfo parameter when sending the message

use of binfo changes service_type value!!!

Hi!First a question...I got a carrier, where messages are billed by MO, and I need to bill some by MTThey told me to use the SMPP billing parameter, which I guess is binfo, right?They sent me an e-mail with this: Meaning: Value: Parameter tag 0x060B

Re: use of binfo changes service_type value!!!

On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 18:00 -0200, Juan Nin wrote: I got a carrier, where messages are billed by MO, and I need to bill some by MT They told me to use the SMPP billing parameter, which I guess is binfo, right? Yes. Meaning: Value: Parameter tag 0x060B Length 0x0007 Billing format tag

RE: binfo

Hmmm... I found it... It is the %B parameter. Rene Kluwen Chimit -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rene Kluwen Sent: donderdag 9 maart 2006 21:24 To: users@kannel.org Subject: binfo Is there a field in the dlr-url string that is set

binfo

Is there a field in the dlr-url string that is set to the binfo value of the (dlr) message? I have an smsc driver that uses this field (soon to come). Rene Kluwen Chimit

Re: esm_class again :) ( binfo)

Enver ALTIN wrote: It looks like Fred passes additional pairs of key:values without the need of patching Kannel... that would be great! :) No, he was adding some comments about another solution Stipe proposed, so that was a totally different subject. I just realized that binfo

Re: esm_class again :) ( binfo)

that was a totally different subject. I just realized that binfo is a variable that can be passed to sendsms... But according to what Fred says it looks like he uses it to pass aditional parameters to the smpp module... is this correct? can binfo be used to accomplish the modification of esm_class

Re: esm_class again :) ( binfo)

Enver ALTIN wrote: Let me sum it up, My patch adds another CGI parameter to sendsms called submission_mode, and SMPP will directly set esm_class to that value. Fred's solution was to prevent adding SMSC-specific sendsms parameters by passing a list of name=value pairs via binfo and use

esm_class again :) ( binfo)

: http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/devel@kannel.org/2280385.html There, Fred says: I have been making use of binfo with further embeded key:values in the string for this kind of problem of passing smsc specific key/values to the smpp driver. it may not be the right thing to do, but at least I

Re: esm_class again :) ( binfo)

On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 09:53:43AM -0200, Juan Nin wrote: Hi! Hey, I need to use esm_class 0 with a Telco. I could change Kannel's code to use it as default mode (but would mean running 2 different Kannel instances) or maybe use Enver Altin's smpp-esmclass-submissionmode patch.

Re: esm_class again :) ( binfo)

-submissionmode patch. Although it's far from the perfect solution, the patch I've posted a while ago will work. -HTH Maybe I'll use it, but I'd like to know what's that about binfo... It looks like Fred passes additional pairs of key:values without the need of patching Kannel... that would be great