Re: Thanks to Fedora community; Installation Disk Partitioning ISSUE

2011-11-04 Thread Linux Tyro
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote: This is how bootloading works... First, there is bios, which is programmed to look for and execute the boot code in the MBR, and it does so at some point. The look for and execute means that bios needs to access the MBR

Re: Thanks to Fedora community; Installation Disk Partitioning ISSUE

2011-11-04 Thread Linux Tyro
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote: Nothing is permanent, of course, it would just be a hassle to fix. Neither Windows nor Linux would boot, and you would need to boot from the installation DVD or something called the Rescue CD, and use the rescue

hostbased ssh

2011-11-04 Thread Judith Flo Gaya
Hello all, I would like to know if someone in the list is using hostbased ssh. I'm trying to set it up on my f14 machine and for some reason it does not work. openssh-5.5p1-21.fc14.2.x86_64 2.6.35.6-45.fc14.x86_64 #1 SMP I made the changes on ssh_config adding EnableSSHKeysign yes Host *

Re: Thanks to Fedora community; Installation Disk Partitioning ISSUE

2011-11-04 Thread Linux Tyro
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote: This is how bootloading works... Well, since (now) /home is a separate partition, but we cannot boot from /home only because it is not containing the required file to get booted and it is only for storing the data.?

Re: question(s) on Brassero (maybe bug)

2011-11-04 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/04/2011 12:52 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: I am trying out burning DVDs on F14 and I am seeing some weirdness that I would like to understand before I call it a bug. I burn a directory on F14. The directory structure is deep (as in

Re: F14 installed chromium, but it won't start

2011-11-04 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 09:48 -0700, jackson byers wrote: ]$ uname -r 2.6.35.14-97.fc14.i686 installing chromium seemed to complete without errors: [root@f14 ~]# cd /etc/yum.repos.d/ [root@f14 yum.repos.d]# wget

Re: corrupted MAC error using scp

2011-11-04 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 11/03/2011 02:01 AM, Gerhard Magnus wrote: I'm at my wits end with this problem: A small LAN with three boxes and hardwired ethernet connections through a router. PuteF: server, running FC15 (x86) and LXDE PuteB: running FC13 (386) and gnome PuteD: running FC15 (386) and KDE I can

Re: Thanks to Fedora community; Installation Disk Partitioning ISSUE

2011-11-04 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Friday 04 November 2011 11:11:56 Linux Tyro wrote: Well, since (now) /home is a separate partition, but we cannot boot from /home only because it is not containing the required file to get booted and it is only for storing the data.? In principle one probably could tweak a system into

JDK 7 status and IcedTea

2011-11-04 Thread fernando
Hi there, I saw messages on the archives stating that OpenJDK 7 would be the default Java for Fedora, such as: http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-devel-list/2011-08/msg01586.html But the features page states that OpenJDK 6 will be the default, which OpenJDK 7 as an optional preview:

Re: JDK 7 status and IcedTea

2011-11-04 Thread Deepak Bhole
* ferna...@lozano.eti.br ferna...@lozano.eti.br [2011-11-04 10:05]: Hi there, I saw messages on the archives stating that OpenJDK 7 would be the default Java for Fedora, such as: http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-devel-list/2011-08/msg01586.html But the features page states that

Re: JDK 7 status and IcedTea

2011-11-04 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/04/2011 02:05 PM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote: I saw messages on the archives stating that OpenJDK 7 would be the default Java for Fedora, such as: http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-devel-list/2011-08/msg01586.html But the features page states that OpenJDK 6 will be the default, which

Re: Re: JDK 7 status and IcedTea

2011-11-04 Thread fernando
Hi there, Thanks for the quick replies. And about OpenJDK6 packates included on Fedora, I guess they are also built using IcedTea. But are they certified? And I guess correctly openjdk6/7 packages in Ubuntu and Debian are also built from IcedTea? Certification is the same for them or each

Re: JDK 7 status and IcedTea

2011-11-04 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/04/2011 02:35 PM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote: And about OpenJDK6 packates included on Fedora, I guess they are also built using IcedTea. But are they certified? Yes. And I guess correctly openjdk6/7 packages in Ubuntu and Debian are also built from IcedTea? Certification is the same

Re: Thanks to Fedora community; Installation Disk Partitioning ISSUE

2011-11-04 Thread Linux Tyro
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote: In principle one probably could tweak a system into booting from the /home partition, but I see no reason to ever want such a configuration. You want to think of the /home partition as your working area --- it is used

Re: F14 installed chromium, but it won't start

2011-11-04 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 15:34 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 09:48 -0700, jackson byers wrote: ]$ uname -r 2.6.35.14-97.fc14.i686 installing chromium seemed to complete without errors: [root@f14 ~]# cd /etc/yum.repos.d/ [root@f14 yum.repos.d]# wget

Re: Re: JDK 7 status and IcedTea

2011-11-04 Thread fernando
Hi there, You simply run the TCK for each package update? Or is it a more involved process, with auditing and etc? []s Fernando Lozano Original Message From: Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Sex, Nov 4, 2011, 13:01 PM Subject: Re: JDK 7 status

Re: JDK 7 status and IcedTea

2011-11-04 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/04/2011 04:43 PM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote: From: Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com And I guess correctly openjdk6/7 packages in Ubuntu and Debian are also built from IcedTea? Certification is the same for them or each linux distro has to make their own certification? The latter: only

Re: Re: JDK 7 status and IcedTea

2011-11-04 Thread fernando
Hi there, Thanks a lot. But I don't understand, what is top-post ? []s, Fernando Lozano Original Message From: Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Sex, Nov 4, 2011, 14:50 PM Subject: Re: JDK 7 status and IcedTea On 11/04/2011 04:43 PM,

Re: JDK 7 status and IcedTea

2011-11-04 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/04/2011 04:52 PM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote: But I don't understand, what is top-post ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Top-posting Andrew. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

Re: JDK 7 status and IcedTea

2011-11-04 Thread Joe Zeff
On 11/04/2011 09:52 AM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote: Hi there, Thanks a lot. But I don't understand, what is top-post ? Top post is what you did when you put your reply at the top of the message instead of below the quoted text as is considered proper for this mailing list. Yes, I know

Re: JDK 7 status and IcedTea

2011-11-04 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/04/2011 05:05 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: Top posting is considered bad manners in most technical fora because it reverses the normal order of conversations, putting the answer before the question. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such

Re: corrupted MAC error using scp

2011-11-04 Thread Don Quixote de la Mancha
You may have flaky hardware. I once had bad RAM that was sensitive to the particular way the memory was accessed. The only problem it ever caused was that FTP downloads to that machine were *always* corrupted. I never, ever had any other problems. Memtest86 discovered the bad memory module,

Re: question(s) on Brassero (maybe bug)

2011-11-04 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 11/4/2011 4:53 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: I normally use GnomeBreaker to burn CD/DVDs. The windows compatibility mode (Juliet file system) is enabled by default. So is the Rockridge file system for Linux name support. You can still read CD/DVDs without the Rockridge file system. Linux

gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brassero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 11/4/2011 3:18 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: On 11/4/2011 4:53 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: I normally use GnomeBreaker to burn CD/DVDs. [...] Mikkel - -- Mikkel: Thanks for advice. I am presuming you meant Gnomebaker, not Gnomebreaker? [...] Paul Gnomebaker is not going to

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brassero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 17:32 -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote: On 11/4/2011 3:18 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: On 11/4/2011 4:53 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: I normally use GnomeBreaker to burn CD/DVDs. [...] Mikkel - -- Mikkel: Thanks for advice. I am presuming you meant

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 11/4/2011 6:51 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I've not been following this thread, but is try k3b too obvious? (apart from pointing out that it's Brasero, not Brassero). poc Poc: My bad on spelling of Brasero ... thank you for correction. As for k3b, its for KDE if I am correct? I'm on

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread fred smith
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:04:37PM -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote: On 11/4/2011 6:51 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I've not been following this thread, but is try k3b too obvious? (apart from pointing out that it's Brasero, not Brassero). poc Poc: My bad on spelling of Brasero

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 11/4/2011 8:22 PM, fred smith wrote: You CAN do yum install k3b and it'll install the necessary KDE bits along with k3b. that's the way I always do it. Fred: I was unaware that kde packages could operate under gnome and vice versa? No conflicts in doing such? Thanks, Paul -- users

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread fred smith
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:24:39PM -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote: On 11/4/2011 8:22 PM, fred smith wrote: You CAN do yum install k3b and it'll install the necessary KDE bits along with k3b. that's the way I always do it. Fred: I was unaware that kde packages could operate under

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread Paul Allen Newell
On 11/4/2011 8:26 PM, fred smith wrote: On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:24:39PM -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote: On 11/4/2011 8:22 PM, fred smith wrote: You CAN do yum install k3b and it'll install the necessary KDE bits along with k3b. that's the way I always do it. Fred: I was unaware that kde

Re: gnomebaker [WAS: Re: question(s) on Brasero (maybe bug)]

2011-11-04 Thread Don Quixote de la Manvha
At one time gnome and kde did not interoperate well because of different conventions for some GUI stuff like the clipboard but those were harmonized long ago. You don't need all of kde, just the dependencies. Your problem may be that you are exceeding the maximum length for an absolute