I'm trying to connect to a windows guest on an F19 host from an F19 client.
remote-viewer spice://10.10.11.100:5972
(remote-viewer:19994): GSpice-WARNING **: Could not connect to
10.10.11.100: Connection refused
xml for the guest has:
Not sure how you troubleshoot this. I can ssh into the
I have a desktop system with both wired and wireless adapters on the
motherboard.
I keep the Wireless set to off.
A network icon shows as an Airplane in the upper right of Gnome.
I can turn off Airplane mode, and the icon goes away until the next boot.
How can I make the Airplane mode icon stay
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 03:15:13PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> What's the basis for a "two years out" assessment? I'm not finding a
> related FOSDEM or DevConf session where this was discussed. Has anyone who
> was present for these conversations written about it yet?
Hallway talk, I'm afraid. Ho
On 02/16/14 06:06, Christopher Thielen wrote:
> I believe I followed the instructions at
> http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2011/fedora-16-nvidia-drivers-install-guide-disable-nouveau-driver/
> which are admittedly out of date.
>
> I _did_ have a /usr/lib/modprobe.d/blacklist-nouveau.conf, t
On Feb 15, 2014, at 6:29 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 05:08:47PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> My efforts are on Btrfs in this regard. It's so much simpler to use and
>> manage. If you don't want to use certain features you don't have to, and
>> it'll behave pretty much li
I believe I followed the instructions at
http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2011/fedora-16-nvidia-drivers-install-guide-disable-nouveau-driver/
which are admittedly out of date.
I _did_ have a /usr/lib/modprobe.d/blacklist-nouveau.conf, thanks for
suggesting that. I deleted it and rebooted:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 01:05:21PM -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Suvayu Ali
> wrote:
> > Does it need more karma? In that case could people on this
> > list please test and submit feedback.
>
> Done. :-) Should be in updates-stable in the next push.
Than
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Does it need more karma? In that case could people on this
> list please test and submit feedback.
Done. :-) Should be in updates-stable in the next push.
-T.C.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change s
On 02/15/2014 10:12 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
at this point, before i go any further, if my math is correct, is
there some command that can be used to ask, "if i *tell* you that a PV
started at this offset, and the first part of it is trashed, can you
tell me what you can find in the *rest*
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 17:59:23 +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 08:08:05AM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The person that submitted the build to bohdi should be able to request a
> > > > push to stable after this much time. Then it will move to stable shortly
> > > >
On Feb 14, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 02/14/2014 04:08 PM, Chris Murphy issued this missive:
>>
>> On Feb 14, 2014, at 7:41 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/12/2014 11:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
On 02/15/2014 10:12 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i would think it would be simpler than that -- here's the top part
of the backup file:
= start =
... snip ...
description = "Created *after* executing '/usr/sbin/pvscan --cache --activate ay
/dev/block/8:21'"
creation_host = "localhost
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Anyone else having issues with evolution not automatically removing mail
> from the Junk folder on exit, even though it's checked to remove it? Seems
> this has been the case during F20 and F19 and recent versions of evolution.
>
> It also
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 08:08:05AM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > >
> > > The person that submitted the build to bohdi should be able to request a
> > > push to stable after this much time. Then it will move to stable shortly
> > > (around a day).
> >
> > Thanks for the clarification. I posted
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 02/14/2014 08:52 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >so ... what now? i can see the detailed definition of the
> > volume group, and all of the logical volumes that were/are(?)
> > still there, and the only LV i care about is "home" which is the
> > f
On 02/14/2014 08:52 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
so ... what now? i can see the detailed definition of the volume
group, and all of the logical volumes that were/are(?) still there,
and the only LV i care about is "home" which is the fifth one down in
the list of LVs, suggesting it's far enough
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 09:26:06 -0500 Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 08:08:05AM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > zathura 2.6 was released even before F20 was released but the
> > maintainer appears not to want to release it on F20 and will keep it
> > at 2.4 all through F21 perhaps,
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 08:08:05AM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> zathura 2.6 was released even before F20 was released but the
> maintainer appears not to want to release it on F20 and will keep it
> at 2.4 all through F21 perhaps, since rawhide appears to be F22? Why? No
> one knows. These policie
> >
> > The person that submitted the build to bohdi should be able to request a
> > push to stable after this much time. Then it will move to stable shortly
> > (around a day).
>
> Thanks for the clarification. I posted a comment on the corresponding
> bug report half a week back, but I doubt a
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 05:08:47PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> My efforts are on Btrfs in this regard. It's so much simpler to use and
> manage. If you don't want to use certain features you don't have to, and
> it'll behave pretty much like a plain partition. I'd rather be having data
> problems
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 05:32:26PM -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
> I think LVM is quite useful for people who have large numbers of
> servers and are constantly having to deal with partitions running out of
> space and such. Is it as simple as a regular partition system? No. But
> recovering a gronked
Hi Bruno,
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 05:29:53AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:24:07 +0100,
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >
> >I had submitted an RFE to include info docs for python in Fedora end of
> >last summer. Eventually I ended up working on it with some help, and
> >the
Allegedly, on or about 14 February 2014, Chris Murphy sent:
> So it's f'n annoying to get fanboys who say it must be the default for
> installation and POOF they're NOWHERE to be found when people need
> help with recoveries and so forth.
Sounds a reasonable argument not to use it, to me.
--
[ti
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:24:07 +0100,
Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi,
I had submitted an RFE to include info docs for python in Fedora end of
last summer. Eventually I ended up working on it with some help, and
there was a working update submitted in December. This has been sitting
in updates-testi
Hi,
I had submitted an RFE to include info docs for python in Fedora end of
last summer. Eventually I ended up working on it with some help, and
there was a working update submitted in December. This has been sitting
in updates-testing since then. What needs to be done to get this to
stable? D
25 matches
Mail list logo
